Police sue to stop Trump paying those who attacked them
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
Because he has did what he could to prevent them from being exposed in the Epstein files.
Are the complete unredacted Epstein files available to Congressional members?
No, there are some redactions in those files, additionally the PP has had his name and others redacted in all files. Pam Blondy said so.
Feb. 6, 2026
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Department of Justice will allow members of Congress to review unredacted files on the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein starting on Monday, according to a letter that was sent to lawmakers.
The letter obtained by The Associated Press says that lawmakers will be able to review unredacted versions of the more than 3 million files that the Justice Department has released to comply with a law passed by Congress last year.
To access the files, lawmakers will need to give the Justice Department 24 hours’ notice. They will be able to review the files on computers at the Department of Justice. Only lawmakers, not their staff, will have access to the files, and they will be permitted to take notes, but not make electronic copies.
The arrangement, first reported by NBC News, showed the continued demand for information on Epstein and his crimes by lawmakers, even after the Justice Department devoted large numbers of its staff to comply with the law passed by Congress last year. The Justice Department has come under criticism for delays in the release of information, failing to redact the personal information and photos of victims and not releasing the entire 6 million documents collected in relation to Epstein.
Still, lawmakers central to the push for transparency, described the concession by the Justice Department as a victory.
trump did not win the case. he settled with himself. he decided not to litigate the case. Given his conflict of interest...
And even those files were redacted and others held back.
In March 2026, Congresswoman Laura Friedman personally reviewed the supposedly "unredacted" Epstein files at DOJ headquarters and found hundreds of pages still completely blacked out. When she asked about the fully redacted documents, DOJ personnel told her that was "how the FBI sent them over." house
Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche — both former personal attorneys for President Trump — insisted in a letter to Congress that no records were withheld on the basis of "embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary." NPR
An NPR investigation found that the Justice Department removed or withheld dozens of pages from the public Epstein files — including what NPR identified as roughly 50 to 53 pages of FBI interview summaries and notes tied to a woman who accused Trump of sexual abuse when she was a minor. Factually
Redactions or withholding of files based on reputational harm to a public figure are explicitly forbidden under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The law Trump signed appears to be selectively enforced by the administration Trump leads. Truthout
Both the Republican chair of the House Oversight Committee and Democrats pledged to investigate the Justice Department's handling of the missing files. That kind of bipartisan alarm is notable. NPR
The above is from AI, I will provide the citations.
RELEASE: Rep. Friedman Demands Answers After Finding Hundreds of "Unredacted" Epstein Files Still Redacted
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, march 6, 2026, U.S. Congresswoman Laura Friedman (CA-30) announced that she has sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel demanding answers after she personally reviewed the supposedly “unredacted” Epstein files at DOJ headquarters and...
friedman.house.gov
NPR published an investigation on February 24, 2026, f...
Executive summary NPR’s Feb. 24, 2026 investigation found that the Justice Department removed or withheld dozens of pages from the public “Epstein files” ...
New Report Indicates Trump-Linked Epstein Records Kept Out of DOJ Database
Files featuring Trump’s name have been removed from or kept out of the database from the very beginning, NPR reports.
truthout.org
If you believe the millions of files are not complete, you should sue the government. Do you have access to an attorney?And even those files were redacted and others held back.
In March 2026, Congresswoman Laura Friedman personally reviewed the supposedly "unredacted" Epstein files at DOJ headquarters and found hundreds of pages still completely blacked out. When she asked about the fully redacted documents, DOJ personnel told her that was "how the FBI sent them over." house
Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche — both former personal attorneys for President Trump — insisted in a letter to Congress that no records were withheld on the basis of "embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary." NPR
An NPR investigation found that the Justice Department removed or withheld dozens of pages from the public Epstein files — including what NPR identified as roughly 50 to 53 pages of FBI interview summaries and notes tied to a woman who accused Trump of sexual abuse when she was a minor. Factually
Redactions or withholding of files based on reputational harm to a public figure are explicitly forbidden under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The law Trump signed appears to be selectively enforced by the administration Trump leads. Truthout
Both the Republican chair of the House Oversight Committee and Democrats pledged to investigate the Justice Department's handling of the missing files. That kind of bipartisan alarm is notable. NPR
The above is from AI, I will provide the citations.
RELEASE: Rep. Friedman Demands Answers After Finding Hundreds of "Unredacted" Epstein Files Still Redacted
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, march 6, 2026, U.S. Congresswoman Laura Friedman (CA-30) announced that she has sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel demanding answers after she personally reviewed the supposedly “unredacted” Epstein files at DOJ headquarters and...
NPR published an investigation on February 24, 2026, f...
Executive summary NPR’s Feb. 24, 2026 investigation found that the Justice Department removed or withheld dozens of pages from the public “Epstein files” ...factually.co
New Report Indicates Trump-Linked Epstein Records Kept Out of DOJ Database
Files featuring Trump’s name have been removed from or kept out of the database from the very beginning, NPR reports.
That is what I said many posts earlier. Thanks for the confirmation.
It is simply a fact that they are not complete.
Trump runs the parts of the Government that held back major portions of the Epstein files. He is a pedo protector.
Last edited:
Was Biden a pedo protector? Was Bill Clinton a Pedo Protector?
You're jumping in that post. The kind of up and down jumping that doesn't take you anywhere. Your usual speed.
Not sure, they did not have a law passed by congress instructing them to make the file available. At what point was there no active investigation, that is when the file should have been released.
At least Clinton and Biden did not run on the promise to release the files.
مرگ بر آمریکا
سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی
An egregious denial of due process for Jan. 6 protesters
The footage was kept from the American public by a Democratic Congress so a false narrative became cemented in the public consciousness.nypost.com
Judge threatens to report lawyers for disciplinary action for slowing jailed 1/6 defendant's case
The judge said that "attorneys have now delayed this trial multiple times to the detriment of their client."www.cbsnews.com
Judges Begin Freeing Jan. 6 Defendants and Dismissing Their Cases (Published 2025)
Two prominent far-right extremists with central roles in the Capitol attack, Enrique Tarrio of the Proud Boys and Stewart Rhodes of the Oath Keepers militia, have been set free.www.nytimes.com
Thanks. If any of this turns out to be accurate, then I'd say those defendants should be entitled to some compensation, perhaps wages lost. Not millions of dollars for one guy though. They DID commit crimes.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Some didn't even commit crimes, while many were only charged with minor misdemeanors. And, I agree. It should be case by case.
They should all be shot for trying to overthrow the government.
What a dumb comment.
The case was almost certainly going to be unsuccessful, so it is insane to say trump gave himself $1.8 billion to avoid paying more. This is where we get to the conflict of interest, that he is paying himself $1.8 billion in taxpayer money to get $1.8 billion.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
And one more moron squeaks up. It was 3-hour riot, nothing more.