Post your memes here! Time for some fun.
- Thread starter Damocles
- Start date
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
That's because everyone knows your idea of "normalcy" is having everything according to MAGA while rejecting everything that isn't based on MAGA nutjob extremism.
There's no way in hell little miss Terri Ann is ever going to put forth any actual sane, non-partisan ideas for returning to a balanced, middle of the road state of normal in America like it once was.
Want proof?
Read the following...
Just like I figured.
A wish-list of MAGA totalitarian strong arm fascist "my way or the highway" suggestions that is antithetical to the spirit of making America normal again.
And though the looney progressive far left is not above the same level of critique, MAGA itself is the antithesis of normal.
Wrong.
First comes the Leftist's tantrum.
Why? Why should voting be something made as easy as possible rather than as secure as possible? Why should people get to vote whenever they want rather than do it all at once together?
Sane people know that having an election day doesn't mean having voting that goes on for weeks, even months, on end totally unsupervised, while letting anyone and everyone handle the ballots.
Actually, these days, the Democrats are losing the working class and trades to the Republicans. That sort doesn't vote for radical Leftists who went to ivy league universities and spout Marx.
Who's restricting voting access? Make election day a national holiday with pay if you want, but make it the day everybody votes in person with an ID proving who they are. If you don't want that, have the indelible ink pot you stick your finger(s) in when you vote, like some other countries do.
Even Turd World countries figured out how to make sure it's one person, one vote. But you do it in person. No ballot harvesting. No mail-in ballots. No weeks of voting.
And the rant from the Left continues.
Example: "J6 was not an attempt to overthrow the government and overturn a the results of a fair, legal and legitimate election."
Example: "Democrats engage in mass voter fraud with totals numbering in the hundreds of thousands with undocumented immigrants comprising most or all instances." Even though Republican Governors, Supervisors of Elections and the courts at every level up to and including the SCOTUS have rejected every such claim ever made, based on a complete lack of evidence.
Go outside and play in your sandbox.
If ever there was ever made, a totally and transparently partisan idiotic statement....
More non sequiturs in the form of a rant.
Bullshit. First, that line of claim comes from the early to mid 2010's and is over 15 years old now. Times have changed. Anthropogenic climate change--as pressed by the IPCC, and Leftist environmental front--has been proven wrong over and over now. Claims have been debunked, predictions nearly 100% wrong. Alternative theories have come forward that question CO2 as a primary cause.
Fact Checking The Claim Of 97% Consensus On Anthropogenic Climate Change
Belief in the scientific community in human-caused climate change is clearly below 97%, a close review of the evidence shows, but the claim continues to be widely publicized and defended. Would a lower level of consensus convince anyone concerned about global warming to change their views?
www.forbes.com
Of course, my favorites are Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima, and the like. The Left and their environmental front prove themselves complete idiots on this subject, that is when they haven't resorted to outright lies.
Say, like this site (full of shit):
The 5 Most Radioactive Places on Earth - Cosmo Science
Throughout history, both human activities and natural disasters have led to the creation of some of the most radioactive places on Earth.
cosmoscience.in
Their photo of "Fukushima" isn't even Fukushima, it's an unrelated chemical plant fire.
So, "Climate change" on its own is hardly a proof of anything. The Left is generally scientifically illiterate. That is my point. As a rule, the radical Left is composed of liberal arts types that have little to no scientific, engineering, or other technical background.
Claim made without proof.
A Closer Look At The Left’s Agenda: Scientific, Economic, And Numerical Illiteracy On The Campaign Trail
Many of the Left’s recent policy proposals are not only quite radical, but scientifically, economically, and numerically illiterate. They are crowding out discussion of serious proposals to deal with the legitimate issues raised. A closer look reveals, for example, that Medicare for All and the...
The left is also guilty of unscientific dogma
The left likes to pride itself as being firmly on the side of science, scoffing at conservative questioning of climate change, pollution, and evolution. But while Liberals are certainly au fait with evolution, they’re far less accepting of the evidence when it challenges their own ideology.
Political Ignorance and Misinformation on the Left
Liberal political commentator Matt Yglesias explains why these problems are far from being confined to the right side of the political spectrum.
reason.com
Anyone on MS-NOW, CNN...
I can play that name game too. Doesn't prove anything.
Librtlover
Verified User
Librtlover
Verified User
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
All while giving the finger to Europeans!
Librtlover
Verified User
Librtlover
Verified User
Good point, for those so-called NATO allies are not paying their fair share for their own defense.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Nomad
Verified User
Says the MAGAtard as he throws his tantrum.
There has never been credible evidence that voting is not secure. One proves their identity when they first register to vote, then in the vast majority of voting districts, show a photo ID. Then their signature is visually compared to the signature on the ID.
The only people in favor of making it harder to vote, are those who feel it would give their side an unfair advantage.
The right, IOW.
Sane and INTELLIGENT people know that many Americans are outside the country on election day or have other situations in which they need extra time to get their vote cast.
This nonsense about getting it over with as fast as possible is tantamount to a rushed trial in a kangaroo court where expedience trumps fairness.
The right is losing sane, moderate people who are sick of the drama and sleaze coming from MAGA.
That's a grossly oversimplified band aid fix that doesn't come close to addressing any of the non issues you all keep throwing against the wall.
More nonsense.
Talk to these guys ...
Still haven't been able to grasp the meaning of "non-sequitur" I see.
You've been proven to be a lying POS who'll say anything no matter how ridiculous.
Over and over now.
As for your link, once again, you really ought to actually read them before posting them as backup sources, because almost every one you post supports the opposite of what you claim.
From your Forbes article ..
Fucking idiot.
No they have not.
More climate scientists than ever have accepted the theory as fact.
The only "debunking" that has occurred has been from right-wing liars and deniers.
Irrelevant to the subject, so I won't waste my time dealing with them.Of course, my favorites are Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima, and the like. The Left and their environmental front prove themselves complete idiots on this subject, that is when they haven't resorted to outright lies.
Say, like this site (full of shit):
The 5 Most Radioactive Places on Earth - Cosmo Science
Throughout history, both human activities and natural disasters have led to the creation of some of the most radioactive places on Earth.
Their photo of "Fukushima" isn't even Fukushima, it's an unrelated chemical plant fire.
YOU are scientifically illiterate, so your comment is meaningless.
Whereas you don't possess a degree in anything.
But the 84% to 97% (depending on which estimate you believe) of the climate scientists in the world DO have those backgrounds and they DO advocate the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming/Climate Change.
You're just some former Navy enlisted deck swabber who's moronic views matter to nobody.
An apt description of every claim you ever make.
More biased shit to not waste my time on.A Closer Look At The Left’s Agenda: Scientific, Economic, And Numerical Illiteracy On The Campaign Trail
Many of the Left’s recent policy proposals are not only quite radical, but scientifically, economically, and numerically illiterate. They are crowding out discussion of serious proposals to deal with the legitimate issues raised. A closer look reveals, for example, that Medicare for All and the...www.hoover.org
The left is also guilty of unscientific dogma
The left likes to pride itself as being firmly on the side of science, scoffing at conservative questioning of climate change, pollution, and evolution. But while Liberals are certainly au fait with evolution, they’re far less accepting of the evidence when it challenges their own ideology.qz.com
Political Ignorance and Misinformation on the Left
Liberal political commentator Matt Yglesias explains why these problems are far from being confined to the right side of the political spectrum.
Irrelevant.
You made the claim of a universally left-biased media.
I merely provided examples of much worse bias in the right-wing media.
I can play that name game too. Doesn't prove anything.
Yeah, just a lying idiot looking at himself...
