T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Law school requires no math, no science, no facts, just the ability to make shit up as you go and write it down. It's one of the simplest liberal arts there is.
Post your memes here! Time for some fun.
- Thread starter Damocles
- Start date
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Librtlover
Verified User
Librtlover
Verified User
Nomad
Verified User
And you couldn't cut any of what you just spoke of.
No math, no science, no facts, no nothing.
Yet here you are, trying to pass off that Mr. Superiority bullshit.
If you don't think the law involves complex reasoning, sorting out tangled, intertwined facts and deciding which ones take legal precedent over others, then you're just a typical naive right-winger.
Often, lawsuits go far beyond standard civil or criminal proceedings due to their size, multi-party involvement, heavy volume of evidence, or intricate legal and technical questions.
Multiple party cases Involve numerous plaintiffs, defendants, cross-claims, or third-party participants. They require large firms with several attorneys and support staff, reviewing millions of documents, extensive data collection, and endless depositions, often regarding highly specialized subjects which rely heavily on technical, financial, or scientific expert witnesses which the attorneys also have to have a grasp of.
Many of these kinds of cases often involve high-stakes shareholder suits, breaches of fiduciary duty, or corporate governance conflicts, antitrust & competition, allegations of illegal monopolies, price-fixing, or unfair trade practices, securities & financial fraud, complex fraud schemes, insider trading, or Ponzi schemes, complex construction defects, multi-party property, building damage, etc, etc, etc.
And none of that even includes complex criminal cases.
When I was much younger, I worked temporarily at a large local law firm that was representing the plaintiff, Seminole Electric Cooperative, a north Florida utilities company, in a lawsuit over defective steam turbine power plant generators that were purchased by them from a large overseas manufacturer.
I can guarantee you that this case did not require "just the ability to make shit up as you go and write it down" as you so simple mindedly put it.
I doubt you could make it through one year of law school much less handle a complex technical case.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Blah, blah, blah...
The law is just an argument with rules. It involves simply knowing the rules better than your opponent. That's what it boils down to. The only real variant of that is when the judge (refree) is biased.
Your typical liar... err, lawyer, is little more than a glorified legal clerk. They do paperwork, submit it to the court, and get a ruling.
Nothing you presented changes my point: A law degree is nothing but a graduate level liberal arts degree. It is one of that is relatively simple to get as all you really need is a good GPA. Doesn't matter what the undergraduate degree was in. Most lawyers opt for political science or history as those two are easy to maintain the high GPA in.
Nomad
Verified User
Yep, that's what you sound like.
I guess you're just too mentally and intellectually limited to understand the idea that in order to argue court cases in the modern world that often involve highly complex, technical scientific, medical and engineering related issues, an attorney has to study and familiarize him/herself with the very same highly complex, technical aspects which are at the heart of these matters.
But then, I doubt that you even understood what I just said.
The bitter smell of envy wafting off of your words is palpable.
Sez the loser with no degree whatsoever because he's so insane with jealousy of those who have them.
Librtlover
Verified User
