Only a hardened Marxist leftist would proselytize as you do below. Don't bother trying to claim that you are somehow a conservative.
Christians say that God is real.
You don't have any metrics.
Ocean temperatures are rising.
Only where winter is transitioning to summer, or night is transitioning to daytime.
The polar ice caps melting.
Too funny. The polar ice sheets are accumulating ice, at a rate of 3 to 4 vertical meters per year. You are one seriously gullible idiot. You know those icebergs, like the one that sunk the Titanic, that fill the Arctic and Antarctic seas? That is the ice accumulation breaking off. You gotta be stupid to not be able to put 2 and 2 together.
Nope. You have to be fuqking brain dead to allow others to convince you of something this stupid that any rational adult can easily verify is absolutely not true.
Weather systems have become more volatile.
Nope, and now you are revealing that you don't know what a "system" is, i.e. that you are throwing that word in there in order to sound more "technical." You should hang it up.
This is all numbers and numbers do not lie.
This is all psychological warfare, and you got nuked. You are a scientifically illiterate leftist who was exceedingly gullible and who fell for the scam, all because you are too intellectually lazy to perform your own due diligence and verify what you were being ordered to believe.
What we do not know is how much of it is natural and how much of it is man made.
There you go using the Marxist "
We" again, implying that you individually are somehow countless in number with a collective knowledge and wisdom that is divinely inspired by your faith in Global Warming.
If you were to have used correct wording, you would have written "What I do not know is how much of the religious dogma I am being ordered to believe is natural and how much I am to assert is the responsiblity of supernatural human activity magic."
I do not know how we address it,
What is "it"? I need an unambiguous definition. Please don't tell me that all the data you claim above was for whatever undefined and unrelated things that you leftists wanted to lump together. Please tell me that you have unambiguous defintions that make regression analysis of your "The Data" statistically valid.
You're mathematically incompetent, aren't you? You don't understand a single thing I wrote above, do you? You don't have any unmabiguous definitions, do you? Only now are you realizing that your WACKY religion isn't the settled science you were ordered to believe.
Gullible leftists. Too funny.
since if it is more a natural phenomenon I am not sure there is much mankind can do to address it.
Nothing that is completely undefined can be addressed.
Though we ought to try as much of lower Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn are going to be under water at some point, as well as a lot of Florida.
In how long? The ocean doesn't seem to be rising, but New York does seem to be sinking, and in 154 years, it will have sunk 12 inches.
Why should anyone care before the end of Vance's 2 terms?
The naval base at Norfork is largely flooded nine to ten times a year these days.
The Hampton Roads region is sinking at about 4mm per year.
The Army Corp of Engineers estimates that by 2050 it could be flooded 280 days of the year,
Subjunctive fallacy. The Army Corps of Engineers acknowledges the possibility that Norfolk could be hit by an asteroid and be submerged every day of the year.
What is the Army Corps of Engineers' projection of what Norfolk will be in 2050?
What does this have to do with your WACKY religion?
by 2100 over 20% if the base would be permanently under water.
Subjunctive fallacy. You should stop broadcasting the errors of your WACKY religious dogma.
I am all for green energy but it has nothing to do with the environment.
Correct. "Green Energy" is all about destroying global energy, destroying the global economy, defeating capitalism world-wide, and imposing abject misery on the human population.
Leftist's Creed: We're not happy until you're not happy.
It has everything to do with economics.
Not exactly. It has everything to do with HATRED of economics, HATRED of sound economic principles, and HATRED of human happiness. Nothing short of rendering all of humanity completely broke and miserable will satisfy the loser left that everything is finally FAIR.
The economy of scale says that carbon energy is going to continue rising in cost,
... only if leftists get their way and continue demonizing CO2 in their efforts to destroy the global economy.
while green energy will continue to fall in price.
"Green energy" is not sustainable and will go under the moment it is no longer subsidized. Hydrocarbons are the world's cheapest and most reliable renewable energy source, hence the price will always remain lower than everything but coal.
The nation that handles the conversion best and holds the patents for it will have a major advantage in the economics of the future.
Nope. The nation that wastes it money just to be left holding a bill of goods will be the first to cease to exist.
I'd like that to be the United States.
I know you do. You HATE capitalism and you HATE America.
Trans people have human rights.
Women have human rights.
What needs to be done is allow (trans) to get to know themselves, give them all the love and the best advice they can get from professionals, and make those life altering decisions when they are mature enough to make them.
You should specify the age that you believe makes them mature enough. Many leftists take that to mean six years of age. Others think that if they have learned to speak, then they are obviously mature enough to make those kinds of decisions.
I also notice that you completely omitted the parents. You substituted "professionals" and the State for the parents. Are you aware that this totally gives you away? Are you aware that you are broadcasting
Communist Manifesto?
This line of yours: "...all the love and the best advice they can get from professionals" instead of from their parents is one of the most heinous things you could have written. Is "Marxist tyranny" your middle name?
