Question for JPP lefties - no thread ban

How do?

Why didn’t they sway it?

they couldn't overall but may have stopped the Dems from flipping even more GOP seats, propaganda can only do so much

btw after the Dems gain enough control of Congress the GOP gerrymandering nixed, Americans can actually vote in those they'd like to see in Congress and the WH
 
In other words, when Democrats win you consider it a valid election but when Democrats lose it can't be anything to you but the other side cheated.

Republicans can only win by cheating. They cannot win based on the merits of their ideas, policy, or beliefs.


That's what happens when a society where you give trophies to those that finish last.

You mean like monuments to soldiers who lost a war? Those kinds of participation trophies?


They begin to think that something not going their way was someone not done on a fair level.

Sounds exactly like Confederate Monuments.
 
Republicans can only win by cheating. They cannot win based on the merits of their ideas, policy, or beliefs.

Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
That's what happens when a society where you give trophies to those that finish last.
You mean like monuments to soldiers who lost a war? Those kinds of participation trophies?


Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
They begin to think that something not going their way was someone not done on a fair level.
Sounds exactly like Confederate Monuments.

Where are these ?


'
 
The 2018 mid terms has exposed the hoax that is Russian interference in 2016

You're saying there was NO Russian interference in 2016, with or without the cooperation of Trump's associates?

What do you think the "Internet Research Agency" was about, then?
 
Did Russia try to interfere with the 2018 mid terms?

If so how?

Don't know, but if at all minimally, what is one legislator going to do for you in a Congress of over five hundred members? Why risk exposure now when you got 2020 coming up?

Besides, if you already own a Chief Executive why would you need a Congressman from Salina, Kansas who has to run again in two years?
 
Well one would think logically that if Putin went to all of that trouble to put Donald Trump in the White House, he would do all he could to protect his investment

Why wouldn’t Putin do all he could do to keep the the House in GOP hands

The 2018 mid terms has exposed the hoax that is Russian interference in 2016
You are simply exposing what they already know; the whole thing (Wussia!) is a GD hoax.
 
I don't know. It took quite some time after the 2016 election for us to become aware of the large role that Russia played in that election. For example, this came out almost a full year after the election:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/us/politics/russia-2016-election-facebook.html

These didn't come out until a year and a half after the election:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ing-the-2016-election/?utm_term=.e1aca2dd7113
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...russians-accused-election-meddling/602319002/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech...social-media-ads-released-congress/849959001/
https://www.cbsnews.com/media/russian-ads-on-facebook-a-gallery/

So, it may be a while before the extent of Russian involvement in the 2018 mid-terms, if any, is known.
Why didn't the House go to the GOP?
 
Why didn't the House go to the GOP?

The Republicans were very unpopular.

I take it the implicit content of your question is something like "The Russians couldn't have been involved in the election, or if they were involved they must have backed the Democrats, since the Democrats won which could not happen if omnipotent Russians were backing the Republicans." As you can no doubt see, with the implicit content spelled out that way, it relies on the notion that the Russians must be omnipotent, when it comes to election manipulation. There's no reason to believe that notion. Obviously the Russians could have interfered on behalf of the Republicans, and shifted results a few points in their favor, without that being able to overcome the blue wave in enough races to keep the House from going to the Democrats.
 
The Republicans were very unpopular.

I take it the implicit content of your question is something like "The Russians couldn't have been involved in the election, or if they were involved they must have backed the Democrats, since the Democrats won which could not happen if omnipotent Russians were backing the Republicans." As you can no doubt see, with the implicit content spelled out that way, it relies on the notion that the Russians must be omnipotent, when it comes to election manipulation. There's no reason to believe that notion. Obviously the Russians could have interfered on behalf of the Republicans, and shifted results a few points in their favor, without that being able to overcome the blue wave in enough races to keep the House from going to the Democrats.
Actually, they did well compared to stomping the Dems took when they lost 63 seats.

However, had Russia "stolen" the Presidential election, they would have ensured the GOP maintained absolute power -- which they didn't.

Because it was all a hoax. How stupid does that feel?
 
However, had Russia "stolen" the Presidential election, they would have ensured the GOP maintained absolute power -- which they didn't.

Hehehahaa! That's a bit like being told a thief couldn't have embezzled funds from your bank account, because if he had, he'd have stolen your car and your TV, too.

How stupid does that feel?

It feels beyond stupid -- almost as if you were intentionally lampooning right-wing attempts at "logic" by getting it so deliberately and outrageously wrong.
 
I don't know.

If they did, it was not very effective as the Nationalists did not do very well,

They significantly outperformed Marxist leftists like you during the Obama midterms; does that mean Obama was even less popular and more hated?
 
Hehehahaa! That's a bit like being told a thief couldn't have embezzled funds from your bank account, because if he had, he'd have stolen your car and your TV, too.



It feels beyond stupid -- almost as if you were intentionally lampooning right-wing attempts at "logic" by getting it so deliberately and outrageously wrong.
The joke's on you. The election was never stolen -- ..."duh Wussians" was all a hoax. The Dems had a shit candidate who no one wanted. End of story.
 
The joke's on you. The election was never stolen -- ..."duh Wussians" was all a hoax. The Dems had a shit candidate who no one wanted. End of story.

In brain dead liberal idiot land, where most these JPP leftists wallow, it couldn't possibly have been that Hillary was a shitty candidate. Yes, they really are THAT fucking dense. ;)
 
Back
Top