Question for JPP lefties - no thread ban

America First said:
The joke's on you. The election was never stolen
Click to expand...

It's pretty much universally acknowledged by all knowledgeable observers that the Russians interfered with the 2016 election. If you don't want to call that a "stolen election," that's semantics, but certainly they did their best to alter the results.

The Dems had a shit candidate who no one wanted.
Click to expand...

As a reminder, the Democrats had a candidate who got about three million more votes than the Republican candidate -- in fact, the third-most votes anyone in American history had ever gotten (after each of Obama's elections).
 
Oneuli said:
It's pretty much universally acknowledged by all knowledgeable observers that the Russians interfered with the 2016 election. If you don't want to call that a "stolen election," that's semantics, but certainly they did their best to alter the results.
Click to expand...
Define "interfered" and provide proof. Mueller may need your help, after two years, he has none.


As a reminder, the Democrats had a candidate who got about three million more votes than the Republican candidate -- in fact, the third-most votes anyone in American history had ever gotten (after each of Obama's elections).
Click to expand...
Had she won 50 million votes in LA county, she still wouldn't be President.

She did not win the majority required for the Electoral college.

Obama was re-elected by the slimmest margin of any sitting President in history. 3.6% which was half of his 7.3% margin in '08. Most sitting Presidents win with LARGER not smaller numbers, but most of those were not economic terrorists.
 
America First said:
Actually, they did well compared to stomping the Dems took when they lost 63 seats
Click to expand...

The popular vote margin in 2010 was 6.5%, for 2018 it was 6.3%.

So the margin was the same.

The reason the Dems didn't take the same # of seats was because Conservatives gerrymandered them so much, they couldn't.
 
America First said:
However, had Russia "stolen" the Presidential election, they would have ensured the GOP maintained absolute power -- which they didn't.
Click to expand...

Well, that's what they did after 2016 when the GOP controlled all three branches of government.

It's not Russia's problem the GOP squandered that power because Conservatism is an ungovernable belief system, and the people behind it are frauds, hucksters, con artists, and racist Nazi wannabes.
 
America First said:
The joke's on you. The election was never stolen -- ..."duh Wussians" was all a hoax. The Dems had a shit candidate who no one wanted. End of story.
Click to expand...

Untrue. Russian propaganda was effective enough at turning just enough white racists out to vote for Trump. If propaganda isn't effective, companies wouldn't spend billions on advertising, and a MAGAt wouldn't have wandered into that DC Pizza Shop armed & looking to bust up a pedophile ring he believed was true because all you MAGAts were sharing that propaganda.
 
America First said:
Define "interfered" and provide proof. Mueller may need your help, after two years, he has none
Click to expand...

Fact is, you don't know what Mueller has.

No one does because Mueller doesn't leak.

And every time you post something like this, it just lets everyone know how insecure in this you are, and that when this evidence is presented, you will be emotionally incapable of handling it, and that will likely manifest itself in a violent act, like all right-wingers end up doing.
 
America First said:
Define "interfered" and provide proof.
Click to expand...

Sure. They used money to influence the outcome of the election. See the links I provided earlier in the thread about Russian Facebook ad buys used to influence the election.

Mueller may need your help, after two years, he has none.
Click to expand...

Actually, as you'll recall, he's made multiple indictments of Russians -- Putin just won't extradite them to face trial, and Trump is too much under Putin's control to exert any pressure.

She did not win the majority required for the Electoral college.
Click to expand...

It's true that the Electoral College's members chose to ignore the will of the American People and instead installed Trump in the presidency.

Obama was re-elected by the slimmest margin of any sitting President in history.
Click to expand...

Incorrect. Obama won 51.1% to 47.2% against Romney. Bush, in 2004, won by 50.7% to 48.3%. That makes Obama's margin 62.5% larger than Bush's. So, we literally only have to go back to the prior sitting president to find out you're wrong. Obama also got a far larger electoral margin in 2012 than Bush did in 2004.
 
America First said:
Had she won 50 million votes in LA county, she still wouldn't be President. he did not win the majority required for the Electoral colle
Click to expand...

Not sure "we won on a technicality" is a great campaign slogan for 2020.

Also, when you hang your hat on the electoral college, you wash away any electoral mandate you think you got. It actually makes your arguments weaker because you're admitting you lack popular support for your policies.

So congrats on doing the thing we've been trying to do; undermine your credibility and base of support.
 
Oneuli said:
Incorrect. Obama won 51.1% to 47.2% against Romney. Bush, in 2004, won by 50.7% to 48.3%. That makes Obama's margin 62.5% larger than Bush's. So, we literally only have to go back to the prior sitting president to find out you're wrong. Obama also got a far larger electoral margin in 2012 than Bush did in 2004.
Click to expand...

Ouch. That stings.
 
If it were not for the reality that so many others share your intellectual, and mental, handicap you could be the poster boy for the low IQ right wing voter.

America First said:
Define "interfered" and provide proof. Mueller may need your help, after two years, he has none.
Click to expand...

That is one of the problems when you have to deal with such a secretive country as is Russia, and then try to get its cooperation. But the low IQ types never consider what has been proven, or accomplished:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/feature...r-indictment-tells-us-about-election-hacking/


Had she won 50 million votes in LA county, she still wouldn't be President.

She did not win the majority required for the Electoral college.
Click to expand...

So that negates the reality that her superior numbers prove that Trump was not Ameirca's choice, just that of the elitists? If she had won 75,000 more votes in three key States we would not have to put up with the senile pervert you preferred.

https://www.weeklystandard.com/john...n-pennsylvania-wisconsin-and-michigan-updated
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top