Because the law says so. It's funny how I know more about the law than a supposed attorney.
Where does the law say that hearsay is inadmissible in this instance? In Congress?
Here are the rules about when it is admissible in Federal Court.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_803
“I was not a direct witness to most of the events described.”
Where does the law say that hearsay is inadmissible in this instance? In Congress?
Here are the rules about when it is admissible in Federal Court.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_803
Where does the law saw hearsay is inadmissible in this case?
Is something being done in a Federal or State Court?
The transcript of the call was removed from the normal filing system to a top secret system because advisors were afraid the bribe would be exposed. That’s abuse of the top secret system and a cover up.
It’s also consciousness of guilt.

How many threads is this psycho going to start?

You're still pretending you're an attorney and know anything about the law.
Where does the law saw hearsay is inadmissible in this case?
So u think hearsay should remove a sitting US President?
They will call the direct witnesses, because the whistleblower told them who they are.
He or she should step forward out of the darkness
You're still pretending you're an attorney and know anything about the law.