Read the whistleblower complaint, new crime!

Darth Omar said:
Why don’t these sniveling cowards show their faces?
Click to expand...

Because the president would punish him.


Trump on Thursday told staff from United States Mission to the United Nations that he wanted to know who gave information to the whistleblower about his call with the Ukranian President, calling the person who did it "close to a spy" and that "in the old days" spies were dealt with differently, The New York Times reported.
 
Jarod said:
What definition, show me a definition that requires firsthand knowledge? Loser.
Click to expand...

Well; the first definition would be having the actual FACTS. The ANONYMOUS FAKE whistleblower had no facts. It was a massive pile of opinionated innuendo and bullshit. ;)

Secondly, The ANONYMOUS FAKE whistleblower would have had to have been there and not made claims based on ANONYMOUS FAKE White House employee speculation. ;)

Lastly; the actual transcript proves that the ANONYMOUS FAKE whistleblower made shit up. ;)

Not hard to comprehend if you aren't a patently dishonest hyper partisan asshole. ;)
 
Jarod said:
Because the president would punish him.


Trump on Thursday told staff from United States Mission to the United Nations that he wanted to know who gave information to the whistleblower about his call with the Ukranian President, calling the person who did it "close to a spy" and that "in the old days" spies were dealt with differently, The New York Times reported.
Click to expand...

Well, since it’s hearsay from anonymous sources their testimony would never be admissible in court, so I guess this one is over before it got started.
 
Last edited:
Darth Omar said:
Well, since it’s hearsay from anonymous sources their testimony would never be admissible in court, so I guess this one is over before I got started.
Click to expand...

Hearsay almost always leads to admissible evidence. Your argument is incredibly stupid not even the Republicans in the house or senate are making that argument.
 
Today Trump threatened the whistleblower, threatening a witness is a federal crime. Add another account to the impeachment articles.
 
If a witness goes to a police officer and says Jimmy told me he killed Bob, the police officer is allowed to use that hearsay to investigate whether Jimmy killed Bob or not.
 
Hi Stretch,

Stretch said:
It's the usual Dem TDS scenarios.
Anonymous, hearsay, lies, same players involved, accusations against Trump that the Dems are actually guilty of, on and on. Nothing new.
Click to expand...

It's just amazing how we can see the same news and come to such different conclusions.
 
Jarod said:
Because the president would punish him.
Click to expand...

He could not do anything outside of the law. We know the ANONYMOUS FAKE whistleblower lied and we know that the ANONYMOUS FAKE whistleblower was not the source.

It's the SOURCE which the ANONYMOUS FAKE whistleblower could not name that needs to be concerned for their job.

Jarod said:
Trump on Thursday told staff from United States Mission to the United Nations that he wanted to know who gave information to the whistleblower about his call with the Ukranian President, calling the person who did it "close to a spy" and that "in the old days" spies were dealt with differently, The New York Times reported.
Click to expand...

If you work within the White House, spreading lies and false rumors about calls within the White House is a violation of the law and proper conduct. These ANONYMOUS FAKE whistleblower's need to be unmasked and sent packing because it is obvious they have a corrupt agenda to spread lies and rumors about Trump.
 
Jarod said:
Hearsay almost always leads to admissible evidence. Your argument is incredibly stupid not even the Republicans in the house or senate are making that argument.
Click to expand...

We have the actual conversation. It is OBVIOUS that the ANONYMOUS FAKE whistleblower who was never in the room was lying. :rolleyes:
 
Jarod said:
Today Trump threatened the whistleblower, threatening a witness is a federal crime. Add another account to the impeachment articles.
Click to expand...

The ANONYMOUS FAKE whistleblower is not a witness because there was no crime to witness. Therefore, your claims are pathetic, stupid and false. :rolleyes:
 
Jarod said:
If a witness goes to a police officer and says Jimmy told me he killed Bob, the police officer is allowed to use that hearsay to investigate whether Jimmy killed Bob or not.
Click to expand...

What crime did the ANONYMOUS FAKE whistleblower witness? :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top