Republicans stole the 2024 election

T. A. Gardner said:
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. It's clear that large scale fraud with mail-in ballots is possible. From ballot harvesting to third party voter registration, to allowing mail-in ballots to be sent to public, rather than personal, addresses, and beyond, the whole of the system is set up to allow fraud without detection.

Or, far-Left denials about fraud or the potential for fraud and the security of mail-in ballots which is equally baseless.
Click to expand...
Try using that as a defense in court.
 
Crepitus said:
They are, obviously enough, gearing up to screech "foul" in November.
Click to expand...
They are very self-righteous regardless of the facts. They all have "alternative facts", don'tcha kno? LOL

As student of behavioral psychology, I've often wondered if it's possible to induce Cerebral Apoplexy across the Internet. Several media outlets prove it can be done via cable and video podcasts, but the challenge is to do it solely by text forum. Text can be powerful, but also easily misunderstood over single or limited communications. A pattern of posts is a better indication for potential candidates in any focused study.

Thousands of posts is an terrific indicator of personality traits, education, rationality, background, political views, etc. Cross-reference traits against other models such as "average Fox News viewer", anger levels, Selfish (immature) vs team-oriented (mature), narrow-mindedness vs knowledgeable of differing perspectives, and the like or "Attended a No Kings protest", Supports equal rights for all Americans, Walks the walk of respecting thy neighbor and other Western values including John Locke.*

The point being that every post is a data point and a large enough group of data points draws a picture of the person. This can be used for good or ill.

6wam70.jpg

*https://phs.phoenix.k12.or.us/uploa...net_PHILO_curriculum/John_Locke_abstracts.pdf
earthly judges, the state in particular, and human beings generally, cannot dependably evaluate the truth-claims of competing religious standpoints; even if they could, enforcing a single 'true religion' would not have the desired effect, because belief cannot be compelled by violence; coercing religious uniformity would lead to more social disorder than allowing diversity.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top