As explained before, common sense dictates that no one can deny that which has yet to be proven, too bad MAGA’s illusionary reality doesn’t comprehend common sense
“Right-wing activist James O’Keefe charged with unlawful voting”
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
serenity
Verified User
Social consensus is common sense sharing same ideologies born to buried over multiple generation gaps in history up to current events this rotation of the planet.
Common since conception is one's chromosomes arrived at conception remain same individual died of old age. Nobody else had or gets same chromosomes again even as siblings or any next generations. Cloning doesn't create the previous ancestor, just makes a look alike.
Simple compounding results never duplicate any ancestor of any species conceptions are generated to add another generation gap to a specific ancestral lineage daily here.
Evolving process in plain sight. Again, James O'Keefe is no more a right wing activist than the man in the moon is.
Into the Night
Contributor
Denying history won't work, anchovies.
Yakuda
Verified User
By getting as far as he did. Where he SHOULD have been stopped by the system was where he claimed to be someone but was never required to prove who he claimed to be. This has been explained to you 1000 times that where the system would have PREVENTED him from voting.
This is a rather simple issue, if you show up at a polling place and claim to be Tom Stupiddem then produce an ID that proves you are Tom Stupiddem. If you cant then you dont vote. Understand? My money is on NO
What you claim is akin to someone getting in a bank while filming himself and giving false name to a teller then walk away, going "See? It's so easy to rob a bank."
He didn't go that far.
That makes zero sense as he never attempted to vote.
Um he got charged, dumbass.
And once again, the axiom stands, common sense dictates, no one can disprove that which has yet to be proven, NEXT
Yakuda
Verified User
He was asked what his name is asshole. Did you not even watch the video? Oh course you didnt you're a fucking moron.
If he had been asked to produce an ID the whole thing would have stopped right there. The system would have stopped him but it didnt. This is simple He cline to be X and was never asked to prove who he claimed to be. Why would advocate for a system that doesnt require that means you want to cheat.
No shit, Sherlock? That's exactly what got him in trouble.
At least one of their stops they did ask for an ID.
You yourself said he walked away before they could do anything.
He was required to provide an ID.
Yakuda
Verified User
Thats not a time stamp on the video. He gave then a name and no one asked him to prove he was who he claimed to be.
You realize dont you I unfortunately lived in massholechusetts for years and voted in many elections there and never once was I required to prove i was who I claimed to be so spare me your brain dead bullshit. I gave them a name and they never asked me to prove i was that person.
Yakuda
Verified User
The video you posted you dumbass motherfucker shows the guy left to get 7 friends because he was told he could vouch for 7 other people that they were who they said they were and nobody had to prove a fucking thing
The law already says that, dumbass.
He would have had to show his ID. Gosh I'm wondering if you're acting.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
FYI, Dippy.... you can't sue someone for asking a question or just because of any mind flatulence you have. So once again you make a fool of yourself trying to come off with pseudo intellectual clap trap to condescend & threaten someone.
The rest of your screed is just a lame, some what bizarre dodge to avoid the question and getting schooled in my previous post.
I'm sure the grinning buffoon you see in the mirror is nodding in approval of your blather.
So much more to pity you. Carry on.
Into the Night
Contributor
You have to remember that LeftNut can't remember what happened as little as five seconds ago.
serenity
Verified User
So you have to use other people's arguments? Where is your brain if all you do is mind social consensus daily?
serenity
Verified User
when you can show intent to defraud the public, yes one can.FYI, Dippy.... you can't sue someone for asking a question or just because of any mind flatulence you have. So once again you make a fool of yourself trying to come off with pseudo intellectual clap trap to condescend & threaten someone.
The rest of your screed is just a lame, some what bizarre dodge to avoid the question and getting schooled in my previous post.
I'm sure the grinning buffoon you see in the mirror is nodding in approval of your blather.
Relative time logistics created reasonable doubt about being alive in plain sight throughout history and every leadership of each reality never corrected it leading people through hope, faith, charity, economic possibilities if everyone every generation sacrifices their biological time born to buried to pretend life exceeds adapting in space conception to dead daily here.
Again chromosomes are the specific genes in DNA for each ancestor never duplicated in history beyond speculation it is possible nobody can prove it didn't happen already by intellectual relative time logistics.
Last edited:
Irwin Corey had arguments, obvious you didn’t listen to him, and completely missed the point
serenity
Verified User
What are theories about?
What are theologies about?
what is economics possibilities practiced 24/7 about?
Everyone argues over what real is, but nobody describes actual evolving as positioned in series parallel time currently alive. I do.