Rittenhouse gets standing ovation at conservative conference

Althea said:
Nope. He's done interviews since testifying. He's not a professional witness, and he admits it.

Show us a video of him pointing his gun at the murderer.
Click to expand...

If he says different than what he testified in court, that's perjury.

And WTF is a "professional" witness? He was there, and got shot. How much more "professional" is that?
 
Althea said:
I see you purposely didn't post a video, because none exists that shows him pointing his gun. Prosecution did a frame by frame illustration using the video.

That picture has been used by a number of morons who try to prove that he aimed his gun at the murderer.

If you look at that picture, half of his arm is already gone, which is why his hand moved forward.
Click to expand...

Since you consider Grosskreutz’s testimony to be a lie do you think he should be charged with perjury?
 
Althea said:
Nope. He never said those words
Click to expand...
:laugh: Parsing words now? God you are such a desperate moron.

Under tense cross-examination on Monday, the defendant's lawyer, Corey Chirafisi, asked Mr Grosskreutz: "When you were standing three to five feet from him with your arms up in the air, he never fired, right?"

"Correct," Mr Grosskreutz said.

"It wasn't until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him, with your gun, now your hands down pointed at him, that he fired, right?" Mr Chirafisi continued.

"Correct," Mr Grosskreutz said.
Click to expand...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59216106
Althea ===> :legion:
 
Last edited:
ExpressLane said:
:laugh: Parcing words now? God you are such a desperate moron.


Althea ===> :legion:
Click to expand...
So now you admit that you are parsing words? That's exactly what the defense did when he was on the stand.

No gun was pointed at Rittenhouse, although one should have been, and the trigger pulled.

Stoners don't make for great heroes, evidently
 
Althea said:
So now you admit that you are parsing words? That's exactly what the defense did when he was on the stand.

No gun was pointed at Rittenhouse, although one should have been, and the trigger pulled.

Stoners don't make for great heroes, evidently
Click to expand...
Grosskreutz admitted he pointed a gun at Rittenhouse see testimony in post # 427 . I'm staring to think you are too stupid to read.
 
Althea said:
Nope. He's done interviews since testifying.
Click to expand...
In which he changed his story. So either, he committed perjury in court or he is lying now.
Althea said:
He's not a professional witness, and he admits it.
Click to expand...
Irrelevant. Straw man fallacy.
Althea said:
Show us a video of him pointing his gun at the murderer.
Click to expand...
Rittenhouse is not a murderer. Which one? There are several. You've already seen them. RQAA.
 
Althea said:
I see you purposely didn't post a video, because none exists that shows him pointing his gun. Prosecution did a frame by frame illustration using the video.

That picture has been used by a number of morons who try to prove that he aimed his gun at the murderer.

If you look at that picture, half of his arm is already gone, which is why his hand moved forward.
Click to expand...

This is from a video, dumbass.
 
RB 60 said:
If he says different than what he testified in court, that's perjury.

And WTF is a "professional" witness? He was there, and got shot. How much more "professional" is that?
Click to expand...

No, if it can be shown that he is lying in court or in making a legal document, THAT is perjury.
If he decides to lie, than that is just lying, and slander. He could be prosecuted for that.
 
Into the Night said:
No, if it can be shown that he is lying in court or in making a legal document, THAT is perjury.
If he decides to lie, than that is just lying, and slander. He could be prosecuted for that.
Click to expand...

If he testifies in court that a gun was pointed at him, then changes his story afterwards saying the gun wasn't pointed at him, that constitutes lying to the court. That is perjury.
 
RB 60 said:
If he testifies in court that a gun was pointed at him, then changes his story afterwards saying the gun wasn't pointed at him, that constitutes lying to the court. That is perjury.
Click to expand...

Nope. It constitutes lying and slander. He is not in court right now and is not making any legal claim to his lie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top