Roy Moore accuser admits she FORGED yearbook!!

Not true. Read post 112. And please cite where she presented the entire entry as Moore's.

When all this initially broke, Allred and accuser presented the additional remarks (date & location) as added by Moore. This is why we here were all chasing our tails a few weeks ago making the comparison of handwriting. Remember? We here were all trying to figure out if Moore or Nelson or his assistant really added it because it looked nothing like Moore's handwriting.
 
Look up forged before you post again

Forgery

The creation of a false written document or alteration of a genuine one, with the intent to defraud.


forgery

n. 1) the crime of creating a false document, altering a document, or writing a false signature for the illegal benefit of the person making the forgery. This includes improperly filling in a blank document, like a automobile purchase contract, over a buyer's signature, with the terms different from those agreed. It does not include such innocent representation as a staff member autographing photos of politicians or movie stars. While similar to forgery, counterfeiting refers to the creation of phoney money, stock certificates, or bonds which are negotiable for cash. 2) a document or signature falsely created or altered. (See: forger, counterfeit, fraud)
West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008
 
Exactly. And she did not forge Moore's signature or comment. Adding something below the signature is not forgery.

Example: You go to a Steelers game and get Le'Veon Bell's autograph. Then you write underneath the date and the game information. That is not forgery and that is what Nelson did.

In the full context of what was being presented and charged, Allred misrepresented what was in the full remarks written in that yearbook. Nelson never corrected her at that time.
 
tom-pantsonfire.gif

What does Politifact say about Hillary being a proven liar?
 
The problem was that originally she presented the entire entry as Moore's. Also, embarrassingly enough a WaPo "handwriting expert" declared that he thought the entire entry was consistent with one writer, LOL! Now he's been discredited through this latest admission by Beverly. :rolleyes:
It would still be nice to have the ink examined for age.

Actually, you and your Breitbart source are liars. This is what the ex-FBI expert actually said:

“The writing seems consistent with one writer,” he added, though he pointed out that “Old Hickory House” and the second date appear to be different stylistically — though he’d need to see examples of Moore’s hand-printed writing to be able to determine whether it’s authentic.

Speaking of "consistent", that's what you and Breitbart are - consistent liars.
 
“The writing seems consistent with one writer,” he added, though he pointed out that “Old Hickory House” and the second date appear to be different stylistically — though he’d need to see examples of Moore’s hand-printed writing to be able to determine whether it’s authentic.

"Consistent" is the biggest weasel word in the language. It just means it COULD be true and that don't mean nothin'. THINK
 
In the full context of what was being presented and charged, Allred misrepresented what was in the full remarks written in that yearbook. Nelson never corrected her at that time.
neither has any real credibility now.
you can't come forward and make claims,and then fail to disclose in full
 
Back
Top