Russians react to Vlad's mobilization order

moon said:
Opposition to conscription is a world-wide fact, not a Russian characteristic .
Those Ukrainians that escaped before there was a ban on them leaving will only be able to return home post -Zelensky.
Click to expand...

Opposition to conscription is stronger when it is the aggressor that is conscripting men into an unpopular and unnecessary war that is being lost.
 
ExpressLane said:
:rofl2: you truly are a moron. :laugh:
Click to expand...

floridafan said:
Sure they are.......
Even if they were really reservists, they are not trained and not equipped. At best they are fodder for Putins ambitions. And that is why men are deserting the country by the 10's of thousands.
If Putin said they were fully trained and equipped troops, you would gladly suck up his lies, as you do for those of trump.
Click to expand...

floridafan said:
more excuses.......
If Russia was succeeding they would not be calling up 300,000 unqualified troops. Thats an act of desperation
Click to expand...

You boys keep on a-pumpin' yourselves up

th




Haw, haw..............................haw.
 
moon said:
You boys keep on a-pumpin' yourselves up

th




Haw, haw..............................haw.
Click to expand...

The 300,000 reservists being called up by Russia are "not trained, not experienced and not ready" and it could be an "extremely dangerous" move, a military analyst has told Sky News.

Retired Air Vice-Marshal Sean Bell said the size of the call-up may sound impressive but that those being mobilised were not active, battle-hardened soldiers.

"Because of conscription you serve in the military [in Russia] for a short time," he said.

"They've actually got something like two million reservists who've served in the military in the last five years. If you extrapolate, it's something like 25 million reservists that have at some stage served in the military.

"The challenge with all these numbers is that they look very grand.

"In context, 300,000 sounds a big number but these people are not trained, they're not experienced, they're not ready, and this is an incredibly hostile environment.
 
floridafan said:
The 300,000 reservists being called up by Russia are "not trained, not experienced and not ready" and it could be an "extremely dangerous" move, a military analyst has told Sky News.

Retired Air Vice-Marshal Sean Bell said the size of the call-up may sound impressive but that those being mobilised were not active, battle-hardened soldiers.

"Because of conscription you serve in the military [in Russia] for a short time," he said.

"They've actually got something like two million reservists who've served in the military in the last five years. If you extrapolate, it's something like 25 million reservists that have at some stage served in the military.

"The challenge with all these numbers is that they look very grand.

"In context, 300,000 sounds a big number but these people are not trained, they're not experienced, they're not ready, and this is an incredibly hostile environment.
Click to expand...
Russia couldn't stop Ukraine with their best trained and best equipped volunteer army now they are going to use poorly trained draftees who are poorly equipped and Putin expects a better outcome. We will see what happens.
 
moon said:
You're entitled to think what you like.

Putin has been holding back, imo. Now he's opening it up into a real war.
He hasn't made use of his vastly superior air-power or his heaviest weapons.
Maybe he won't. Maybe he will . Time will tell.
Don't go bragging 'til the dealing's done.

INTERACTIVE-WHO-CONTROLS-WHAT-IN-UKRAINE-1-2.png
Click to expand...

Occupying a strip of land along the shores of the Sea of Azov was not how Putin defined victory.

On February 24, Putin said his war objectives were to demilitarize and de-nazify Ukraine.

He has failed miserably on both counts. Ukraine is better armed than it was seven months ago, and the government in Kyiv is defiant and remains in power.
 
Thank you, Retired Air Vice-Marshal Sean Bell .

I'll wager your uniform no longer fits.
 
anonymoose said:
Did da joos design it? After all da joos control NATO. They control everything. They control the world.
Click to expand...

No- they're rather anxious that the Russians don't prevent them from attacking Syria. They have to have someone to attack. That's Zionist philosophy.
What an ignorant dope like you wouldn't know though is that there are more Christian Zionists than Jewish. Yet you still harp on ' da joos', you poor dumb racist prick.
 
I’m enjoying watching a far right world leader (Putin) go down. It is sad he is destroying so many lives in the process.
 
Cypress said:
Occupying a strip of land along the shores of the Sea of Azov was not how Putin defined victory.

On February 24, Putin said his war objectives were to demilitarize and de-nazify Ukraine.

He has failed miserably on both counts. Ukraine is better armed than it was seven months ago, and the government in Kyiv is defiant and remains in power.
Click to expand...


moon said:
So it's a defeat then. I'll bet that your Zelenskies would like a defeat like that.
Click to expand...

Our stated goal in 1944 was to overthrow Hitler, demilitarize and de-nazify Germany.

If we just occupied a strip of coast in Normandy, do you think anyone would have screamed that counted as a victory?
 
Cypress said:
Our stated goal in 1944 was to overthrow Hitler, demilitarize and de-nazify Germany.

If we just occupied a strip of coast in Normandy, do you think anyone would have screamed that counted as a victory?
Click to expand...

If you occupied it permanently, yes.

How are those pro-Russian referenda doing ?
 
moon said:
If you occupied it permanently, yes.

How are those pro-Russian referenda doing ?
Click to expand...

Dwight Eisenhower would have called you a fool for declaring victory in world war 2 if allied forces were stuck occupying a strip of land on the Normandy coast
 
ExpressLane said:
Russia couldn't stop Ukraine with their best trained and best equipped volunteer army now they are going to use poorly trained draftees who are poorly equipped and Putin expects a better outcome. We will see what happens.
Click to expand...

Yes, we will, bugler.
 
Cypress said:
Dwight Eisenhower would have called you a fool for declaring victory in world war 2 if allied forces were stuck occupying a strip of land on the Normandy coast
Click to expand...

It's you that's declaring ' victory ', bugler . I'm just the messenger with the news that you don't like.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top