SCHOOL SHOOTING, multiple victims-CA (doesn't even warrant 'honorable' mention here?)

Micawber said:
Bump this old thread to celebrate death in schools by guns? Thought so.
Click to expand...

Oh, I thought it might be about this small party for a football game.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/worl...ly-gathered-to-watch-football-game/ar-BBWVlPG

Hmm... it must have been a Chicago Bears fan? What is wrong with these idiots?
What possesses these nuts to go out and shoot people? Some kind of depressant
death threat? 15 minutes of fame (that most don't see anyway)? What is it?

Why did it (again!) happen in the state with the most stringent gun laws? You'd
think all those restrictions would stop all of this shit from happening. Why isn't it?

Yep, gun control works...
 
RB 60 said:
Here ya go, dickhead. refute these facts.

https://americangunfacts.com/
Click to expand...

Just fucking hilarious! Only one piece of bullshit from some pro-gun site? Cite a SCIENTIFIC paper, moron.

Your stupid pro-gun site tries to compare us with Honduras, El Salvador, and Jamaica? What a fucking desperate stretch. Plus, I reference gun deaths, stupid fuck, not just homicides.

Then the absurd thing about UK and violent crimes. Apples to oranges. 1) Violent crimes are defined differently, 2) My citations refer to gun death rates and risk, not violent crimes, you dumbfuck.

The concealed carry reference. Correlation does not mean causation, stupid fuck. Just because a black cat walked in front of you and you got hit by a beer truck doesn't mean the cat caused it.

Kleck is a joke and his work has been continually debunked. When called n his bullshit, he had to revise his data and conclusions, which are still questionable. He's the NRA's favorite social scientist. Note - NOT scientist.

Kicked your ass again, dumbfuck.


https://www.vox.com/2015/10/1/18000520/gun-risk-death
https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/160/10/929/140858
https://slate.com/technology/2015/01...s-suicide.html
https://www.minnpost.com/second-opin...ving-gun-home/
https://lawcenter.giffords.org/facts...ce-statistics/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/study-g...homicide-risk/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...vidence-shows/
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-gun-home-safer.html
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-kellermann.htm
 
domer76 said:
Just fucking hilarious! Only one piece of bullshit from some pro-gun site? Cite a SCIENTIFIC paper, moron.

Your stupid pro-gun siite tries to compare us with Honduras, El Salvador, Jamaica and Yemen. What a fucking desperate stretch.

Then the absurd thing about UK and violent crimes. Apples to oranges. 1) Violent crimes are defined differently, 2) My citations refer to gun death rates and risk, not violent crimes, you dumbfuck.

The concealed carry reference. Correlation does not mean causation, stupid fuck. Just because a black cat walked in front of you and you got hit by a beer truck doesn't mean the cat caused it.

Kleck is a joke and his work has been continually debunked. When called n his bullshit, he had to revise his data and conclusions, which are still questionable. He's the NRA's favorite social scientist. Note - NOT scientist.

Kicked your ass again, dumbfuck.


https://www.vox.com/2015/10/1/18000520/gun-risk-death
https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/160/10/929/140858
https://slate.com/technology/2015/01...s-suicide.html
https://www.minnpost.com/second-opin...ving-gun-home/
https://lawcenter.giffords.org/facts...ce-statistics/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/study-g...homicide-risk/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...vidence-shows/
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-gun-home-safer.html
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-kellermann.htm
Click to expand...

So you think, dickhead.
Again, I have addressed this before and you were (as usual) too stupid to comprehend it.
Why can't you admit that the number of safe gun owners make the numbers of criminals
and accidents minuscule? Are you really that stupid? Apparently, you certainly are....
 
Even though I'm one progressive liberal who doesn't care much about gun control one way or the other, I will enjoy the day when the crackers get their heads cracked and are put in chains for resisting surrendering their assault weapons.

It's just that there are so many even more immediate reasons for rounding them up before then.
 
RB 60 said:
Oh, I thought it might be about this small party for a football game.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/worl...ly-gathered-to-watch-football-game/ar-BBWVlPG

Hmm... it must have been a Chicago Bears fan? What is wrong with these idiots?
What possesses these nuts to go out and shoot people? Some kind of depressant
death threat? 15 minutes of fame (that most don't see anyway)? What is it?

Why did it (again!) happen in the state with the most stringent gun laws? You'd
think all those restrictions would stop all of this shit from happening. Why isn't it?

Yep, gun control works...
Click to expand...

I bet it is gang related.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Even though I'm one progressive liberal who doesn't care much about gun control one way or the other, I will enjoy the day when the crackers get their heads cracked and are put in chains for resisting surrendering their assault weapons.

It's just that there are so many even more immediate reasons for rounding them up before then.
Click to expand...

I purchased my "assault weapons" from the Army to compete in hi-power rifle competitions. Giving them up in not an option. Ever.
 
domer76 said:
Just fucking hilarious! Only one piece of bullshit from some pro-gun site?
Click to expand...
That 'bullshit' comes from a variety of government sources, dumbass.
domer76 said:
Cite a SCIENTIFIC paper, moron.
Click to expand...
Science isn't data or a paper. Redefinition fallacy.
domer76 said:
Your stupid pro-gun site tries to compare us with Honduras, El Salvador, and Jamaica?
Click to expand...
Why not?
domer76 said:
What a fucking desperate stretch.
Click to expand...
Not at all. You are trying to do the same thing, but with 'data' (actually random numbers) from newspapers and magazines.
domer76 said:
Plus, I reference gun deaths, stupid fuck, not just homicides.
Click to expand...
You reference nothing. False authority fallacy.
domer76 said:
Then the absurd thing about UK and violent crimes.
Click to expand...
Not at all. The UK has a high violent crime rate and a high homicide rate.
domer76 said:
Apples to oranges.
Click to expand...
Nope. Homicide is homicide. Crime is crime.
domer76 said:
1) Violent crimes are defined differently,
Click to expand...
No, they aren't. I believe you'll find Scotland Yard defines a homicide as an intentional killing of a person by another, just as the FBI and police do.
domer76 said:
2) My citations refer to gun death rates and risk, not violent crimes, you dumbfuck.
Click to expand...
That is also quite low compared to the number of guns we have in the country.
domer76 said:
The concealed carry reference. Correlation does not mean causation, stupid fuck.
Just because a black cat walked in front of you and you got hit by a beer truck doesn't mean the cat caused it.
Click to expand...
You just torpedoed your own argument and locked yourself in paradox. Which is it, dude?
domer76 said:
Kleck is a joke and his work has been continually debunked. When called n his bullshit, he had to revise his data and conclusions, which are still questionable. He's the NRA's favorite social scientist. Note - NOT scientist.
Click to expand...
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy. Void argument fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (science<->data).
domer76 said:
Kicked your ass again, dumbfuck.
Click to expand...
YALIF.
domer76 said:
...deleted fake news, and magazine sites...
Click to expand...
False authority fallacy. Newpapers and magazines are not valid sources.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top