That 'bullshit' comes from a variety of government sources, dumbass.
Science isn't data or a paper. Redefinition fallacy.
Why not?
Not at all. You are trying to do the same thing, but with 'data' (actually random numbers) from newspapers and magazines.
You reference nothing. False authority fallacy.
Not at all. The UK has a high violent crime rate and a high homicide rate.
Nope. Homicide is homicide. Crime is crime.
No, they aren't. I believe you'll find Scotland Yard defines a homicide as an intentional killing of a person by another, just as the FBI and police do.
That is also quite low compared to the number of guns we have in the country.
You just torpedoed your own argument and locked yourself in paradox. Which is it, dude?
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy. Void argument fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (science<->data).
YALIF.
False authority fallacy. Newpapers and magazines are not valid sources.
Failure, Gibberishboy. Nothing but gobbledeegook
LSMFT