See ya, Matt

Gieco announced they are offering a brand new product: "Mansurance" for high powered males.

/Not really, but would make a funny satire article
 
You just went through an explanation of how certain groups can't be fired and now you are saying the opposite.

No, I am not. Contrary to what TTQ said, employers cannot fire you without cause if you belong to a protected class of employees. They also cannot fire union members without cause, and that almost always requires a long series of documented steps detailing the misbehavior. TTQ stated that the reason they want right-to-work is to be able to discriminate. That's not what it is; it's to prevent unionization and to weaken existing unions.... making it possible to pay lower wages, offer fewer benefits, and also to make it easier to get rid of unwanted employees without all the steps required by most unions.

If you are not a member of a protected class, you can be fired for no reason at all, absent an employment contract. If you are a member, you can still be fired just because they don't want you.... but there may be more documentation required, especially if several members of a particular class are laid off at the same time.
 
Gieco announced they are offering a brand new product: "Mansurance" for high powered males.

/Not really, but would make a funny satire article

Not really satire. Lots of wealthy men have policies that cover the assault of the gold-diggers.

https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/litigation/materials/2013_insurance_coveragelitigationcommittee/b_16_insurance_coverage.authcheckdam.pdf
 
I know you didn't vote for trump, that wasn't the point. I'm criticizing your repetition of the RW talking point that Hillary is a "rape enabler." trump was accused of rape, guess that means his wives at the time enabled him.

Hmmmm

Let’s review

Hillary headed up the “bimbo eruption squad”

Hillary stayed married to him for political expedience because she knew she could never get elected on her own merits

But yeah she wasn’t an enabler
 
You have no idea what assault is do you?

Evidently not.

Anyone who has ever gone to the hospital, or gotten a new physician, has had to sign a consent to treat form. As a health care provider, I cannot touch you -- even to just take your BP or temp -- without that consent. It's called "battery." If I performed something more invasive, such as draw blood, it becomes assault.
 
It is sad to see KKKhristiefan and Legion be at odds. They used to be so close. I could have predicted it though. KKKhristiefan betrays everyone she meets on the inter webs. Just ask Darla


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
I know that grabbing a boob (allegedly) does not represent a clear and imminent danger of bodily harm, injury, or death, Sailor boi.

If you "deck" someone" you can make your case in court when you're brought up on assault charges.

Here: Educate yourself then just shut the fuck up. You have no clue what you are talking.

Generally, the essential elements of assault consist of an act intended to cause an apprehension of harmful or offensive contact that causes apprehension of such contact in the victim.

The act required for an assault must be overt. Although words alone are insufficient, they might create an assault when coupled with some action that indicates the ability to carry out the threat. A mere threat to harm is not an assault; however, a threat combined with a raised fist might be sufficient if it causes a reasonable apprehension of harm in the victim.Intent is an essential element of assault. In tort law, it can be specific intent—if the assailant intends to cause the apprehension of harmful or offensive contact in the victim—or general intent—if he or she intends to do the act that causes such apprehension. In addition, the intent element is satisfied if it is substantially certain, to a reasonable person, that the act will cause the result. A defendant who holds a gun to a victim's head possesses the requisite intent, since it is substantially certain that this act will produce an apprehension in the victim. In all cases, intent to kill or harm is irrelevant.
 
Anyone who assaults (decks)someone, or who has a spouse do the same (settles his hash) should be arrested. Every time. Then and now.
"Fear of losing your job" as a reason not to report it is no excuse. Why would you want to continue work there anyway?

Oh look, here comes the rapist apologist, right on schedule.

I quit working there, you ugly she-man, after that incident. We all know how much you pray that someone would grab something of yours.

How do you know that my coworker's husband laid a finger on the drunken boss? Did I state that? No, I did not.

Go away and find someone else to slime.
 
No, I am not. Contrary to what TTQ said, employers cannot fire you without cause if you belong to a protected class of employees. They also cannot fire union members without cause, and that almost always requires a long series of documented steps detailing the misbehavior. TTQ stated that the reason they want right-to-work is to be able to discriminate. That's not what it is; it's to prevent unionization and to weaken existing unions.... making it possible to pay lower wages, offer fewer benefits, and also to make it easier to get rid of unwanted employees without all the steps required by most unions.

If you are not a member of a protected class, you can be fired for no reason at all, absent an employment contract. If you are a member, you can still be fired just because they don't want you.... but there may be more documentation required, especially if several members of a particular class are laid off at the same time.

What you say here is mostly correct from my understanding. She was claiming these laws exist so black people can be fired for no reason and you said exactly. That's where I was cofused
 
LOL....what exactly does "settle his hash" mean? I'm sure you did
"quit" working there....someone doesn't deck someone and keep their job....
Nothing but entertainment, you are:)
 
That does not justify retaliating to unwanted touching (which is technically "assault") by means of a violent physical assault (decking" someone), Sailor boi.

Assaulting someone is a criminal offense, not a matter of tort.

Are you telling me, a person that supposedly has a gun like you do, does not know when, where and why self defense is allowable? Want me to school you on that also idiot?
 
It is sad to see KKKhristiefan and Legion be at odds. They used to be so close. I could have predicted it though. KKKhristiefan betrays everyone she meets on the inter webs. Just ask Darla

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Why don't you tell the board how I came on to you and you spurned my advances because you learned I had uterine cancer, dumb shit?
 
Back
Top