Shooter a black Dem Obama supporter

Well, Miss Marple:

"Black people in the United States are more likely to be victims of violent confrontations with police officers than whites because they commit more violent crimes than whites per capita.

– FACT: Despite making up just 13% of the population, blacks commit around half of homicides in the United States. DOJ statistics show that between 1980 and 2008, blacks committed 52% of homicides, compared to 45% of homicides committed by whites.

More up to date FBI statistics tell a similar story. In 2013, black criminals carried out 38% of murders, compared to 31.1% for whites, again despite the fact that there are five times more white people in the U.S.

– FACT: From 2011 to 2013, 38.5 per cent of people arrested for murder, manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault were black. This figure is three times higher than the 13% black population figure. When you account for the fact that black males aged 15-34, who account for around 3% of the population, are responsible for the vast majority of these crimes, the figures are even more staggering.

– FACT: Despite the fact that black people commit an equal or greater number of violent crimes than whites, whites are almost TWICE as likely to be killed by police officers.

According to data from the Centers for Disease Control, between 1999 and 2011, 2,151 whites died as a result of being shot by police compared to 1,130 blacks.

Critics argue that black people are over represented in these figures because they only represent 13% of the population, but they are underrepresented if you factor in violent crime offenders. In other words, you would expect the number of blacks and whites killed by police to be roughly equal given that they commit a roughly equal number of violent crimes, but that’s not the case. Whites are nearly 100% more likely to be victims."

https://www.infowars.com/black-crime-facts-that-the-white-liberal-media-darent-talk-about/

Mr. Earl, if we are going to have a reasonable discussion on crime and statistics it would be helpful if you didn't use Infowars as your source.

"Black men who commit the same crimes as white men receive federal prison sentences that are, on average, nearly 20 percent longer, according to a new report on sentencing disparities from the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC). These disparities were observed “after controlling for a wide variety of sentencing factors,” including age, education, citizenship, weapon possession and prior criminal history.

The black/white sentencing disparities have been increasing in recent years, the report found, particularly following the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Booker in 2005. Booker gave federal judges significantly more discretion on sentencing by making it easier to impose harsher or more lenient sentences than the USSC's sentencing guidelines called for. Before that decision, federal judges were generally required to abide by those sentencing guidelines."


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...te-person-study-finds/?utm_term=.bab48dd4c4b5
 
He was able to easily obtain the gun he massacred 11 people with thanks to the GOP, their highly paid shills at the NRA and the low IQ droolers who vote for them.

Try not using a faulty premise next time.
Correct. Pretty sure they didn't have high capacity magazines back when the 2nd was written.
 
Mass shootings with multiple deaths are not just "another gun tragedy", they are horrific events. Each one has unique circumstances, and each one has grieving family survivors. It is unfortunate that these horrific murders all end up getting politicized the way they do by both sides of the aisle, but this is just how things are.

Righties are not going to suddenly shift blame from a shooter to a gun, so it does not make much sense for lefties to repeatedly present righties with the notion that guns can be responsible for shootings.

Since righties are going to continue to believe that the actual shooter who pulls the trigger is who is responsible, and since righties are going to defend the second amendment, what is the point of lefties arguing the notion that blame goes to guns instead of the shooter?

If you are truly concerned about seeing the race card getting played here, and if you are truly sorry for the grieving survivors of this brutal attack, take a look at what Volrock posted:



The title of the thread mentions black and Democrat. How will you feel toward the lefty media if they fail to give this story as much attention as they would to a white shooter who was a Republican? Do the surviving families deserve less consideration because of the race and party of the shooter?

I am not on this thread to argue gun issues. Volsrock's picture in the first post doesn't have a link and the info may not be accurate. Nobody knows if the man is a Democrat who voted for Obama and the salary shown is far below the average for a certified engineer in Virginia Beach. What I really want to know why you and others appear to think that race is a factor in this mass shooting.
 
Yeah, fcktard, those men had no video or DNA evidence against them. Also, you had to go back over 50 years to find an example. I could point to thousands of examples just from Kim Foxx's office of blacks being let off the hook. Yeah, you fcking moron, no whites are saying those men shouldn't have been convicted if guilty. You racist moron, if they were guilty (I'm not familiar with the evidence), they should have been EXECUTED, which is not what any liberal negro piece of shit would think of blacks who kill whites.

I call bullshit. Prove it.
 
I am not on this thread to argue gun issues. Volsrock's picture in the first post doesn't have a link and the info may not be accurate. Nobody knows if the man is a Democrat who voted for Obama and the salary shown is far below the average for a certified engineer in Virginia Beach. What I really want to know why you and others appear to think that race is a factor in this mass shooting.

The significance of the black race on this thread is how the MSM is predicted to give preferential unequal treatment to the shooter because of his race and political orientation.
 
If that's the story you're sticking to, let's see some proof that he's a Dem, and volsrock's unsourced pic doesn't count.

He is a Democrat. If he was not a Democrat, his party would be easy to find. Look hard enough, and you will find that he is a black Muslim Democrat, and that his info is being removed from the internet.
 
Last edited:
The significance of the black race on this thread is how the MSM is predicted to give preferential unequal treatment to the shooter because of his race and political orientation.

You must not be reading or listening to the MSM. Every site I visit has a story about the shooting and there is zero preferential treatment. The main issue is trying to figure out the shooter's motive.

Going by your previous posts I can understand why you think this shooting is being handled with kid gloves.
 
He is a Democrat. If he was not a Democrat, his party would be easy to find. Look hard enough, and you will find that he is a black Muslim Democrat, and that his info is being removed from the internet.

I don't pay attention to predictions or conspiracy theories. Either you have proof or you don't, which is it?

You just love to make up stories about non-white people, even in non-criminal matters.
 
You must not be reading or listening to the MSM. Every site I visit has a story about the shooting and there is zero preferential treatment. The main issue is trying to figure out the shooter's motive.

Going by your previous posts I can understand why you think this shooting is being handled with kid gloves.

The shooter is already receiving preferential treatment. Do you honestly think that nobody knows his party affiliation or religious preference days after the shooting? If you can't find the answer to these questions, then he is already receiving preferential treatment. There is a reason why his party and religion are not being reported, and it is because these things do not fit the lefty narrative.
 
The shooter is already receiving preferential treatment. Do you honestly think that nobody knows his party affiliation or religious preference days after the shooting? If you can't find the answer to these questions, then he is already receiving preferential treatment. There is a reason why his party and religion are not being reported, and it is because these things do not fit the lefty narrative.

If you know his party and religion why don't you post them? I don't know why that's important. What was the party and religion of Ian David Long?
 
Either you have proof or you don't, which is it?

This is what the left and MSM are counting on. They know that lefties will not take the time to fact check anything they say other than going to a lefty run "fact check" site that favors lefty ideology. They know that lefties don't actually care enough to diligently search for the truth, and they know that lefties don't even want the truth. The only research you will do on it is whatever I might post for you, and you will just argue that without actually searching for the real answer yourself.
 
Back
Top