Shots fired at Central Michigan University

[PraiseKek]

yes, because a free people usually respect the freedom of others.

That's historically not been the case, liberal democracies are a historical outlier.

or what we call 'supporting the oligarchy'

No, a separate and co-equal branch of government consisting of learned men who respect the original intent of the Constitution chosen by our elected representatives.

we're not talking about the states money, we're talking about money handed over to individuals in office, fattening their own wallets.

They won't be settling the lawsuits out of their own pockets and the $21 trillion debt hasn't done much to get them unelected.

 

[PraiseKek]

I certainly advocate for a progressive agenda. The only reason I do that is because only a jerkoff would not do it...and I am not a jerkoff.

I also am not a liberal...no matter that I advocate for a progressive agenda.

No you advocate for an anti-Constitutional agenda.

As for "criticizing any left leaning person" you might check out my comments in this thread, before shooting off your mouth:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?91689-ABOUT-CAPITAL-PUNISHMENT!

See if there are any "left leaning" people with whom I disagreed there.

From your OP:

"It (sic) my personal opinion that the maximum sentence for ANY crime…should be ten year or less."

That says it all doesn't it?

 

[PraiseKek]

yes

And that would be the definition of hypocrisy.

 

[PraiseKek]

"If a law was made to outlaw abortion, would you be happy about that because it's 'the law'?'
No I wouldn't be happy, but it would be the law and it would have to be followed!

So you would follow the Aryan Paragraph of the Nuremburg Laws? That's a good little fascist lemming.

 

[Ross Dolan]

No you advocate for an anti-Constitutional agenda.

No I don't.

From your OP:

"In (sic) my personal opinion that the maximum sentence for ANY crime…should be ten year or less."

That says it all doesn't it?

All?

Jesus H. Christ.

Do you even know what "all" means?

And what the hell was the (sic) for? If you wanted to use it...it should have followed the "that"."

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Since you asked, I think our founding fathers would have considered today's Libertarians to be jackasses. I think they would have understood that society and civilization require that each individual give up lots of their freedom...for the better good of society and civilization.

and I think you have zero clue about the founders, because they are your original liberals. but that's your educational issue, not mine.

But I understand. For people like you, red lights and stop signs, among other things, are an inconvenience. [/QUOTE]this tells me you don't have the slightest clue about Libertarianism, but i'm not surprised because current day liberals and conservatives are all about anti freedom.

Well, Smarter, "freedom" implies obligation...whether you can see it or not.

Luckily society and civilization will win out over the barbarism, chaos, and anarchy you consider "freedom" to be.

yes, freedom is slavery, war is peace, and ignorance is strength.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Yeah...to people like you...nothing less than chaos and anarchy is truly freedom.

Civilized people have been at war with the like of you...and eventually will win.

By the way: I am NOT a liberal.

hyperbole is often used to ridicule that which people fear. no worries. freedom is not chaos and anarchy, but neither is it a golden collar. you ARE a liberal. embrace it.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Not the rightys. They think their freedoms are superior to others. They want blacks, latinos and Muslims to lose their rights, so the rightys rights are free .

I don't presume to speak for 'rightys', but thats just absolute horseshit.

 

[Ross Dolan]

and I think you have zero clue about the founders, because they are your original liberals. but that's your educational issue, not mine.

But I understand. For people like you, red lights and stop signs, among other things, are an inconvenience.

this tells me you don't have the slightest clue about Libertarianism, but i'm not surprised because current day liberals and conservatives are all about anti freedom.[/quote]

Libertarian Party in my home town attempted to recruit me to be their council candidate.

I turned them down...and ran as an Independent.

I lost...but got 900 votes...and was expected to get 4 or 5.

yes, freedom is slavery, war is peace, and ignorance is strength.

You have no real idea of what freedom is...or how it is maintained.

 

[Ross Dolan]

hyperbole is often used to ridicule that which people fear. no worries. freedom is not chaos and anarchy, but neither is it a golden collar. you ARE a liberal. embrace it.

I am not a liberal...and you have no idea of what real freedom is all about.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

"If a law was made to outlaw abortion, would you be happy about that because it's 'the law'?'
No I wouldn't be happy, but it would be the law and it would have to be followed!

that alone makes you a serf, not a citizen. enjoy that collar

 

[PraiseKek]

No I don't.

You have repeatedly in this very thread called for the curtailing of our inalienable rights for what you perceive as the greater good.

All?

Jesus H. Christ.

Do you even know what "all" means?

Yes,

All - used to refer to the whole quantity or extent of a particular group or thing.

As in you think that all crimes should only be punishable by 10 years in prison. I misspoke you're not just a leftist you're a fucking wackadoo.

And what the hell was the (sic) for? If you wanted to use it...it should have followed the "that"."

You wrote "it" instead of "in" in your OP my autocorrect must have fixed it.

 

[floridafan]

that alone makes you a serf, not a citizen. enjoy that collar

You are about as phoney as they come. Thats the beauty of these message boards!

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You are about as phoney as they come. Thats the beauty of these message boards!

i'm sure it makes you feel better about your views to consider me a phony, after all.......who in the world could be comfortable with people having freedom......am i right?

 

[Ross Dolan]

You have repeatedly in this very thread called for the curtailing of our inalienable rights for what you perceive as the greater good.

You claimed I advocate for an anti-Constitutional agenda.

I don't.

I do not expect you to be intelligent enough to see that...or to have sufficient integrity to acknowledge it if, by chance, you do.

Yes,

All - used to refer to the whole quantity or extent of a particular group or thing.

Well then use it correctly.

As in you think that all crimes should only be punishable by 10 years in prison. I misspoke you're not just a leftist you're a fucking wackadoo.

You are mischaracterizing my comments.

But...what better can I expect from someone like you.

You wrote "it" instead of "in" in your OP my autocorrect must have fixed it.

Actually, what I did was to leave the "that" in there.

You are not smarter than I. So don't play that game, because you will lose.

 

[Sirthinksalot]

Nope, those people dont own firearms and have zero reason to support the NRA. Try again!

So wait... you think every gun owner is a member of the NRA? And that everyone who doesn't own a gun believes other people shouldn't be allowed to???

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Nope, those people dont own firearms and have zero reason to support the NRA. Try again!

I own firearms and I don't support the NRA........so there goes your bullshit logic. Try again!

 

[PostmodernProphet]

suspected domestic incident......boyfriend #1 = shooter; girlfriend and boyfriend #2 = victims.....

 

[PraiseKek]

You claimed I advocate for an anti-Constitutional agenda.

I don't.

I do not expect you to be intelligent enough to see that...or to have sufficient integrity to acknowledge it if, by chance, you do.

You literally advocated for the curtailing of many freedoms for the good of society and called the Constitution a suicide pact you fascist little piggy.

Well then use it correctly.



You are mischaracterizing my comments.

But...what better can I expect from someone like you.

No this is a direct quote from your post you laughable fuck:


"It (sic) my personal opinion that the maximum sentence for ANY crime…should be ten year or less."

Actually, what I did was to leave the "that" in there.

You are not smarter than I. So don't play that game, because you will lose.

Lol you made a typo, using "it" instead of "in" you dumb fuck:

It my personal opinion that the maximum sentence for ANY crime…should be ten year or less.

God you're fucking dumb.

 

[evince]

suspected domestic incident......boyfriend #1 = shooter; girlfriend and boyfriend #2 = victims.....

19 year old student shot his mom and dad when they came to pick him up for spring break