Ronald Ragan conceived NAFTA. His vision was finally realized in the 90s. The fact is that NAFTA Is a net jobs gain for the United States. Rump used Americans ignorance about NAFTA as a campaign rally cry, now he's weaseled his way out for filling the promise you made. You are so duped.
This one is a softball looking back on threads from liberals about how bad NAFTA was/is for the economy.
From Cypress in 2008:
Slamming Clinton on NAFTA
This is a legitimate criticism of Clinton, that Obama could hammer. She is completely disingenous about her support for NAFTA, a failed trade policy, and selling out the middle class.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?9053-Slamming-Clinton-on-NAFTA&highlight=nafta
Another Cypress thread on NAFTA referencing John Edwards
Another NAFTA: Peru Trade Deal
Watch how Hillary, Biden, Obama vote on this. It will be very telling.
money quote, from John Edwards:
"NAFTA, which was one of our worst trade agreements ever, was written by corporate interests and insiders in all three countries, and it has served them well." -- John Edwards
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?6474-Another-NAFTA-Peru-Trade-Deal&highlight=nafta
uscitizen's comment in the same thread as above:
Yep then that is why the supporters prwedictions about NAFTA were soo far off ? Because it worked so well ? Oops they were off in the bad direction not the good direction....
There are more old threads on this topic. People can change there opinions over time. That's part of growing as a person. It's also often quite clear when we change our political opinions based on political convenience. Reading these old threads about how bad trade deals like NAFTA are for the middle class from board liberals is eye opening.