I noticed that. Good catch.
He is claiming:
* price controls work (even though they don't).
* price controls are necessary (even though they don't work and are fascist in nature, which is government manipulation of markets).
* this is somehow incorporated into the Constitution somewhere.
* that capitalism has failed (even though it never has).
* that fascism is the answer to everything, especially via price controls and other government manipulations of markets.
* that either of us are actually making any claims.
In a sense, the last one is somewhat correct. I am claiming he is making fallacy after fallacy.