"Stop trying to kill our president."

No Democrat wants to assassinate anyone including trump, you liar and idiot. You're the only ones who want to murder anyone. We all remember when you invaded the Capitol screaming "Where's Nancy" and "Hang Mike Pence".

You're all a bunch of scumbag murderers.
And the only person murdered in cold blood that day was an unarmed woman

Oh no some leftist idiot thinks we're scumbag murderers. Whatever shall we do?
 
the more you deny it the more it must be true isn’t an argument, it’s what people say when they can’t point to a single thing in the meme that supports their claim. You’re not proving anything about me, you’re just advertising that you need my silence to keep your story from collapsing.
Deny want douche bag? I'll say it again you're meme says if people didn't support a pedophile you wouldnt have to kill them. That's what it says. You're too much of a coward to stand up and say it.
 

And the only person murdered in cold blood that day was an unarmed woman
She wasn't "un-named". She was a criminal trying to climb trough a broken window of a closed building and she was shot in the line of LE duty. The cop was investigated and cleared.

Why don't you tell me the results of the investigations into the murders of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, Yakuda? Oh wait, you can't. The thugs responsible have been covered for and given total immunity.

This is why I'm saying YOU'RE the fucking murderer. Democrats have murdered no one.
Oh no some leftist idiot thinks we're scumbag murderers. Whatever shall we do?
Listen to truth and reason? It's up to you!
 
Deny want douche bag? I'll say it again you're meme says if people didn't support a pedophile you wouldnt have to kill them. That's what it says. You're too much of a coward to stand up and say it.
you keep quoting a line the meme never said because you need that imaginary version to keep your accusation alive. If your argument depended on the actual text, you wouldn’t have to invent dialogue and then call me a coward for not reciting your fanfiction back to you.
 
you keep quoting a line the meme never said because you need that imaginary version to keep your accusation alive. If your argument depended on the actual text, you wouldn’t have to invent dialogue and then call me a coward for not reciting your fanfiction back to you.
This was your only attempt to explain it:

the meme shows two people trading insults, nothing more. One says ‘stop trying to kill our president,’ the other fires back with ‘stop defending a pedophile.’ It’s a satire of how online arguments escalate instantly. Any ‘meaning’ beyond that is what you injected into it.
This explanation is clearly wrong. Maga guy isn't insulting anyone. He is making a request or demand. TDS guy ignores that statement and then justifies assassination by implying that because Trump is a pedophile it's okay to commit that.

How is either statement an "insult?"
 
This was your only attempt to explain it:


This explanation is clearly wrong. Maga guy isn't insulting anyone. He is making a request or demand. TDS guy ignores that statement and then justifies assassination by implying that because Trump is a pedophile it's okay to commit that.

How is either statement an "insult?"
You’re now arguing that accusing someone of trying to kill our president and defending a pedophile somehow isn’t insulting. That’s not analysis, that’s you pretending basic language doesn’t apply so your headcanon can survive. The meme shows two people escalating accusations, the assassination justification only exists in the script you keep writing over it.
 
you keep quoting a line the meme never said because you need that imaginary version to keep your accusation alive. If your argument depended on the actual text, you wouldn’t have to invent dialogue and then call me a coward for not reciting your fanfiction back to you.
Deeper and deeper you go
 
You’re now arguing that accusing someone of trying to kill our president and defending a pedophile somehow isn’t insulting. That’s not analysis, that’s you pretending basic language doesn’t apply so your headcanon can survive. The meme shows two people escalating accusations, the assassination justification only exists in the script you keep writing over it.
It isn't insulting when the person you're addressing supports doing just that and there are previous attempts that give that credence.

Whereas, claiming that Trump is a "pedophile" is based on pretty thin evidence and no actual cases to try and justify assassination is hardly a valid rebuttal.

That's how I see that exchange.
 
You’re now arguing that accusing someone of trying to kill our president and defending a pedophile somehow isn’t insulting. That’s not analysis, that’s you pretending basic language doesn’t apply so your headcanon can survive. The meme shows two people escalating accusations, the assassination justification only exists in the script you keep writing over it.
No one accused you of trying to kill the president. You clearly don't read with comprehension. You don't understand the meme and you don't understand people here
 
Deeper and deeper you go
deeper and deeper isn’t insight, it’s the sound of a man sinking into the silence where his evidence should be. You keep gesturing at depths you never reach because you know the moment you touch the actual text, your entire accusation evaporates. You’re not exposing anything about me. You’re just proving you walked into this with nothing and you’re terrified everyone can see it.
 
It isn't insulting when the person you're addressing supports doing just that and there are previous attempts that give that credence.

Whereas, claiming that Trump is a "pedophile" is based on pretty thin evidence and no actual cases to try and justify assassination is hardly a valid rebuttal.

That's how I see that exchange.
Good point, there is far more evidence from leftists want to kill Trump then there is that he's a pedophile but as we know, evidence isnt important to them.
 
It isn't insulting when the person you're addressing supports doing just that and there are previous attempts that give that credence.

Whereas, claiming that Trump is a "pedophile" is based on pretty thin evidence and no actual cases to try and justify assassination is hardly a valid rebuttal.

That's how I see that exchange.
you’ve stopped arguing about the meme and started arguing about the people you imagine are behind it. You can’t point to a single line of text that says what you claim, so now you’re rewriting motives, beliefs, and entire moral justifications to fill the gap. That isn’t interpretation, it’s you admitting the meme gives you nothing, so you’re supplying the missing parts from your own head.
 
There are unproven allegations involving minors, but no conviction or legal finding that Trump is a pedophile.
 
Back
Top