SmarterthanYou
rebel
Video begs to differ.
post the video.......if you dare
Video begs to differ.
Try to keep uppost the video.......if you dare
Wrong. He was the aggressor, and can be seen threatening people before he murdered them.but there IS evidence of rittenhouse being attacked and forced to shoot to defend himself..................therefore, there will be no civil suits against rittenhouse that can be won.
He's registered for online study, but the students want to make sure he never haunts the university grounds. They don't need a crazed murderer roaming the grounds with an assault weapon.
This is his future forever. He will be shunned by everyone but the 30% of the nation that are trumpkins.
Someone will take him out if he pushes to assimilate into society. Let him live among his White Supremacist Klan.
The 1st amendment only covers speech concerning anyone in Congress. They cannot sue a citizen for what a citizen says about them. The 1st amendment applies specifically to Congress and only Congress.
The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution.
speculation. thus inadmissable. no judge wants his trials overturned on appeals.........so no evidence at all that rittenhouse said that. per the law, hearsay is inadmissable.
OJ's verdict means that he never killed anyone. The murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman are still open cases. Sir Rittenhouse is recognized as the killer of the two BLM lowlifes that he shot. There is no open case for them.
LOL@dumberthanyou.
Idiot. The biased judge did not allow any evidence of Rittenhouse's pre meditation
No speculation. He admitted to 'wanting to shoot looters'. That will come out in his civil trials
He's on video. The biased judge wouldn't allow it
LOL. OJ begs to differ, and there was no video evidence of the OJ murders
Try to keep up
Wrong. He was the aggressor, and can be seen threatening people before he murdered them.
He will lose in civil court.
Bigly
HAHAHAHA. You stupid dunce. The supreme court changes the constitution all the time. The most outrageous example is plyler v doe where they changed the constitution to say states must provide free k-12 for illegal aliens!!!! Nothing in the constitution about education. THINK, you miserable degenerate tranny.
HAHAHA. Hearsay is inadmissable???? Did you really say that?. Courts have made a million exceptions to that rule.
I read a piece yesterday that only addressed online study. There was no mention of him attending in person, and the groups named wanted him removed from all study at the university.I believe he wants to attend class on campus, his request.
I read a piece yesterday that only addressed online study. There was no mention of him attending in person, and the groups named wanted him removed from all study at the university.
It's possible that things have changed, but now it appears that he's not enrolled anymore.
They call him a murderer which makes it look like they want to be sued!!

If I was a parent I would pull my child from that university.

Rittenhouse is a crazy murderer.

I would be wary of someone who shot 3 people and shows zero remorse.He has shed no tears for the people he blasted.
Sue who?
