Study- 44% of Democrats are OK with Violence to Stop Trump

A survey described by University of Chicago political scientist Robert Pape and reported by outlets like Newsmax and Yahoo News indicates that roughly 44% of self-identified Democrats expressed some level of agreement with the idea that the use of force or violence is justified to prevent Donald Trump from achieving certain political goals or to keep him from power.



Survey Context & Findings
    • The Source: The data stems from ongoing research on political violence and public sentiment directed by Robert Pape through the Chicago Project on Security and Threats (CPOST).
    • The Figures: The survey results noted that a notable minority of respondents overall—and approximately 44% of self-identified Democrats in that specific subset—voiced a conditional openness to force or extreme measures regarding opposition to Trump.
    • Broader Trends: Pape and other researchers point out that acceptance or rationalization of political violence has shown concerning shifts across various partisan groups during periods of heightened political polarization, with segments on multiple sides of the ideological spectrum expressing readiness to justify force under specific perceived political threats
Bring it on bitches,....we've been looking for a reason to give you the beatdown you deserve.
 
A survey described by University of Chicago political scientist Robert Pape and reported by outlets like Newsmax and Yahoo News indicates that roughly 44% of self-identified Democrats expressed some level of agreement with the idea that the use of force or violence is justified to prevent Donald Trump from achieving certain political goals or to keep him from power.



Survey Context & Findings
    • The Source: The data stems from ongoing research on political violence and public sentiment directed by Robert Pape through the Chicago Project on Security and Threats (CPOST).
    • The Figures: The survey results noted that a notable minority of respondents overall—and approximately 44% of self-identified Democrats in that specific subset—voiced a conditional openness to force or extreme measures regarding opposition to Trump.
    • Broader Trends: Pape and other researchers point out that acceptance or rationalization of political violence has shown concerning shifts across various partisan groups during periods of heightened political polarization, with segments on multiple sides of the ideological spectrum expressing readiness to justify force under specific perceived political threats
Huh, That's much lower than I would have guessed.
 
Violence isn’t the answer.

Besides, we owe Trump for doing us the favor of exposing our soft White underbelly: hardcore MAGA.

We could have gone on for ages not realizing we have so many folks with discernment issues among us severe enough that they can’t discern that a fraudulent reality TV game show host isn’t POTUS material. Now that we know, maybe we can address it. Special education earlier in life, perhaps? (Sorry, couldn’t resist). 😁
Tell that to the residents of Hiroshima.
 
A survey described by University of Chicago political scientist Robert Pape and reported by outlets like Newsmax and Yahoo News indicates that roughly 44% of self-identified Democrats expressed some level of agreement with the idea that the use of force or violence is justified to prevent Donald Trump from achieving certain political goals or to keep him from power.



Survey Context & Findings
    • The Source: The data stems from ongoing research on political violence and public sentiment directed by Robert Pape through the Chicago Project on Security and Threats (CPOST).
    • The Figures: The survey results noted that a notable minority of respondents overall—and approximately 44% of self-identified Democrats in that specific subset—voiced a conditional openness to force or extreme measures regarding opposition to Trump.
    • Broader Trends: Pape and other researchers point out that acceptance or rationalization of political violence has shown concerning shifts across various partisan groups during periods of heightened political polarization, with segments on multiple sides of the ideological spectrum expressing readiness to justify force under specific perceived political threats
Of course its the result of untreated TDS
 
A survey described by University of Chicago political scientist Robert Pape and reported by outlets like Newsmax and Yahoo News indicates that roughly 44% of self-identified Democrats expressed some level of agreement with the idea that the use of force or violence is justified to prevent Donald Trump from achieving certain political goals or to keep him from power.



Survey Context & Findings
    • The Source: The data stems from ongoing research on political violence and public sentiment directed by Robert Pape through the Chicago Project on Security and Threats (CPOST).
    • The Figures: The survey results noted that a notable minority of respondents overall—and approximately 44% of self-identified Democrats in that specific subset—voiced a conditional openness to force or extreme measures regarding opposition to Trump.
    • Broader Trends: Pape and other researchers point out that acceptance or rationalization of political violence has shown concerning shifts across various partisan groups during periods of heightened political polarization, with segments on multiple sides of the ideological spectrum expressing readiness to justify force under specific perceived political threats
1790632568880.png
 
And these violent Dems call Republicans Fascists.
Yeah, look at these "violent dems" beating up and bear-spraying cops while trying to overturn a free and fair election that didn't go their way.

1790632660094.png

You're such a fool

And also a dick!
 
A survey described by University of Chicago political scientist Robert Pape and reported by outlets like Newsmax and Yahoo News indicates that roughly 44% of self-identified Democrats expressed some level of agreement with the idea that the use of force or violence is justified to prevent Donald Trump from achieving certain political goals or to keep him from power.



Survey Context & Findings
    • The Source: The data stems from ongoing research on political violence and public sentiment directed by Robert Pape through the Chicago Project on Security and Threats (CPOST).
    • The Figures: The survey results noted that a notable minority of respondents overall—and approximately 44% of self-identified Democrats in that specific subset—voiced a conditional openness to force or extreme measures regarding opposition to Trump.
    • Broader Trends: Pape and other researchers point out that acceptance or rationalization of political violence has shown concerning shifts across various partisan groups during periods of heightened political polarization, with segments on multiple sides of the ideological spectrum expressing readiness to justify force under specific perceived political threats
I'd of thought it'd be a lot higher than that...
 
Bring it on bitches,....we've been looking for a reason to give you the beatdown you deserve.
^He ain't lyin'. The men haven't much shown up to any of these things yet.
We have these things called "responsibilities".
If they have to take themselves away from that to come give a beatdown, they will, and it will be decisive and brutal and quick and over.
 
Back
Top