"Supreme Court lets Sandy Hook shooting lawsuits go forward"

[evince]

My side won 304 - 227 in 2016.

Prove you're an idiot by posting something about a type of vote not mentioned in the Constitution.

cheating is not winning

 

[evince]

I'm not the one whining about guns, cunt. I have them. When you have the guts to try and take them, let me know.

the police will be there any day

 

[CFM]

the police will be there any day

^^^^

A gun hater admitting she doesn't have the guts to do what she claims should be done.

 

[CFM]

cheating is not winning

Kicking your ass in a legitimate election is winning.

 

[evince]

https://www.businessinsider.com/her...ne-ads-equate-owning-the-gun-to-being-a-man-1


"consider your man card reissued"

they are being sued for targeting their product to people who feel bad about themselves and need a gun so they can be real men and that their guns can kill more people


trying to say you can kill more house invaders is not the same as plain ass saying they have more killing power


that is the shit they were saying in their adds


they are fucked

 

[evince]

Bushmaster's "man card" campaign is two years old. The website asks consumers to "prove" they're a man by answering a series of questions.

This unfortunate screen grab depicts Bushmaster revoking someone's "man card" for being intimidated by elementary school students.


from that link

 

[CFM]

they are being sued for targeting their product to people who feel bad about themselves and need a gun so they can be real men and that their guns can kill more people


trying to say you can kill more house invaders is not the same as plain ass saying they have more killing power


that is the shit they were saying in their adds


they are fucked

Post a video where they're saying what you claim.

 

[Into the Night]

"WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Tuesday that a survivor and relatives of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting can pursue their lawsuit against the maker of the rifle used to kill 26 people."

"The justices rejected an appeal from Remington Arms that argued it should be shielded by a 2005 federal law preventing most lawsuits against firearms manufacturers when their products are used in crimes."

"The case is being watched by gun control advocates, gun rights supporters and gun manufacturers across the country, as it has the potential to provide a roadmap for victims of other mass shootings to circumvent the federal law and sue the makers of firearm."

"The court’s order allows the lawsuit filed in Connecticut state court by a survivor and relatives of nine victims who died at the Newtown, Connecticut, school on Dec. 14, 2012, to go forward."

"The lawsuit says the Madison, North Carolina-based company should never have sold a weapon as dangerous as the Bushmaster AR-15-style rifle to the public. Gunman Adam Lanza used it to kill 20 first graders and six educators."

https://apnews.com/8755008e727a4a1b804cdf5cf03ab620

About time, hope they win the case, anybody who makes, manufactures, markets, and sells weapons as an AR15 for pure profit should be held accountable, the purpose of the weapon is to kill as much as it can in the shortest period of time

I can see liability insurance a requirement for gun ownership down the road, gun huggers can't complain, none of it "confiscates" guns nor bans guns

Then the Supreme Court broke the law.

 

[Into the Night]

It will be appealed and struck down. Auto manufacturers can't be sued because drunk drivers kill people.

There is no way liability ins. will become mandatory for gun owners, not in my lifetime. I'd refuse to carry it if it were.

Frankly, if the government tries that, I think MORE people will carry, and not have liability insurance!

 

[Into the Night]

The SCOTUS just said they could proceed, that the Federal Law didn't apply,

It does apply.

so on what grounds if the gun manufactures lose can they appeal to the SCOTUS?

SCOTUS broke the law.

An auto's prime purpose is to provide transportation, AK15s purpose is to kill as many as possible in the shortest amount of time, you can't see the difference?

Not the purpose of an AK15, or even an AR15.

Purpose is irrelevant.

I would not say never, eventually, in my view, guns will be regulated as we regulate autos to include registration, tests, licenses and liability insurance

Not legally possible.

 

[Into the Night]

Right, and you are one of those that have told us in the past the SCOTUS would never rule anything against guns especially with the Trump Court

And on what grounds will they appeal? You just don't say "I appeal" and the higher Court takes the case, especially since now the Federal Law doesn't aply

Federal law does apply.

 

[Into the Night]

Will we be able to sue Alcohol manufacturers, too?

And dice manufactures, playing card manufacturers (it's the manufactures fault I lost $500 at the casino!), and baseball bat manufactures, cutlery manufactures, car and truck manufacturers, rope manufacturers, pot growers, drug dealers, and...........

 

[countryboy]

more kills from a safe distance

So why should citizens be denied the ability to defend themselves from a safe distance?

 

[countryboy]

And dice manufactures, playing card manufacturers (it's the manufactures fault I lost $500 at the casino!), and baseball bat manufactures, cutlery manufactures, car and truck manufacturers, rope manufacturers, pot growers, drug dealers, and...........

Liberals never met a job they didn't want to kill.

 

[moon]

You are ignorant of what guns are manufactured for. Go away, stupid foreigner, and quit having sex with that donkey when you post! We're sick of seeing you hawing because your ass is being slammed!!

You're just a tad miffed, paleface, because you've been hogtied by my very simple truth. Still, I've been saying the same thing for years and now the courts are catching up.
You'll, hopefully, soon be giving your dumbass armory a final polish.

Haw, haw......................haw.

 

[Into the Night]

Ah, no, it was the SCOTUS, it was on appeal from the Connecticut Supreme Court, the byline was from "Washington," but here it is from a second source (https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...ses-to-hear-remingtons-appeal-in-lawsuit-from)

Well, if they win the lawsuit, it will put some manufactures out of business, the price of your toys will skyrocket

And if the law did evolve to treating guns as it does autos you will follow, it won't be a 24hr change and what are you going do, baracade yourself in your house

No, the ruling will simply be ignored.

 

[Into the Night]

No, alcohol's primary purpose isn't to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time

It's not about 'purpose'.

 

[Into the Night]

Auto manufacturers have been sued many times for making unsafe automobiles that hurt and killed people. They are expected to do their best to make autos safer.

Redirection. Contextomy fallacy. Try to follow the conversation, dumbass. Cars are used as weapons.

 

[Into the Night]

Don't even know you, but you are incorrect, the SCOTUS ruled that the gun manufactures' defense that they couldn't be sued based upon a 2005 Federal law was erroneous, that the case could continue, a bad omen for the gun manufactures

And once again, the primary purpose for an auto is to provide transportation, the main purpose of an AK15 is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time, if you can't see the difference you never will understand the arguement

It's not about 'purpose'.

 

[countryboy]

they are being sued for targeting their product to people who feel bad about themselves and need a gun so they can be real men and that their guns can kill more people


trying to say you can kill more house invaders is not the same as plain ass saying they have more killing power


that is the shit they were saying in their adds


they are fucked

Produce one of these ads liar. Now run away, as usual when confronted with your bullshit.