Surrender monkey in the White House.

[Jarod]

Putin was elected to his role. Zelensky has a long history of personal corruption, and his government is no different.

Wrong on both counts.

 

[QP!]

Why do we have a "side" in the Russia - Ukraine war to begin with?

Because the US was part of a group, including Russia who committed to Ukraine that if they got rid of their nukes they would get security guarantees.

 

[martin]

The PP has sided with the adversary in the Russia - Ukraine war.

Trump is siding with a dictator who had his political opponent murdered over a western democracy that was invaded.

Russia is giving Iran intel against us, while we are siding with Russia on their land grab in Ukraine.

Trumps supporters are dip shits.

They are dip shits, but there are fewer of them week by week.

 

[evince]

Zelenskyy is a parasite. Putin is a strong figure Trump admires. The USA has sided with MANY dictators over the years. Nothing new. Bottom line, we look at what it will benefit the USA in the short and long term.

A true confession of utter stupidity

 

[evince]

Putin was elected to his role. Zelensky has a long history of personal corruption, and his government is no different.

This a a RUSSIAN flavored disinformation bot hole

 

[evince]

Zelenskyy is a dictator.

Suspended elections and remained in power past his May 2024 term
Banned 11 opposition parties (March 2022)
Consolidated media control
Sanctioned political rivals (incl. former PM Arseniy Yatsenyuk, ex-president Petro Poroshenko)
Replaced elected local officials with appointed military administrators
Targeted the Moscow-aligned Orthodox Church

War president fighting off a nation trying to take their land


What does their constitution say about it?

 

[evince]

https://verfassungsblog.de/ukraines-constitution-in-wartime/

Read up on it before you pretend to know

 

[evince]

Ukraine’s constitutional order is facing an unprecedented challenge due to Russia’s ongoing aggression. The war has forced the nation to navigate a delicate balance between maintaining democratic governance and ensuring national survival, all while operating under martial law. The looming expiration of presidential and parliamentary terms has sparked debates on constitutional continuity, the legitimacy of wartime governance, electoral feasibility, and the future of Ukraine’s democratic system once the war ends (see here and here on Ukraine’s parliamentary elections during wartime). Amid these challenges, Ukraine’s constitutional framework ensures governance continuity despite suspended elections. This article argues that while wartime elections are neither feasible nor constitutionally required, legitimacy is upheld through constitutional provisions, political consensus, and international recognition. Historical precedents show that democratic states have only held wartime elections when security allowed – unlike in Ukraine now. Understanding these principles is crucial to countering external misinformation and reinforcing Ukraine’s democratic resilience in times of war.