Fixed it for ya
Teflon Don, still sure there will be no impeachment?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Fixed it for ya
It's either puss face beating off like he says here and that is at least better then beating off to his mom and two dogs.
^^Coward comes here, starts a thread about being ready to take a bet, then promptly and cowardly moves the goal posts.
Here's a bet for you cowardly lion: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...berals-are-strongly-encouraged-to-participate
What were you right about?
You refusing to confront truths doesn't make you "right", it makes you a coward.
Centerleftfl
Verified User
DEPENDS ON WHETHER REPUBLICANS GROW ANY BALLS!
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
I was right about Trump beating Hillary. I predicted it. I predicted he would win Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan
I was right about the Stormy Daniels story being a nothing burger. It was. Nobody talks about her anymore and Michael Avenatti has more of a chance of seeing prison than Trump
I was right about Michael Cohen having no dirt on Trump. He rots in jail for his own crimes unrelated to Trump. He had nothing to give.
I was right about Manafort having no dirt on Trump. He sits in prison for crimes he committed unrelated to Trump. He had nothing to give.
I was right about the Mueller investigation being a big fat nothing burger. The democrat party doesn't even talk about Mueller anymore. If there was an impeachable offense in the Muller report then your party would have done it. Everything else you spew is irrelevant. You blame Barr, you blame this, you blame that. The fact is Mueller had nothing because there was nothing
I confront every truth in front of me. You on the other hand glom onto every phony conspiracy that the Democrat Media Industrial Complex puts in from you like a pavlovian dog. All because you are incapable of handling the fact that Trump beat Hillary.
Thats the fact jack
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
I was right about Trump beating Hillary. I predicted it. I predicted he would win Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan
I was right about the Stormy Daniels story being a nothing burger. It was. Nobody talks about her anymore and Michael Avenatti has more of a chance of seeing prison than Trump
I was right about Michael Cohen having no dirt on Trump. He rots in jail for his own crimes unrelated to Trump. He had nothing to give.
I was right about Manafort having no dirt on Trump. He sits in prison for crimes he committed unrelated to Trump. He had nothing to give.
I was right about the Mueller investigation being a big fat nothing burger. The democrat party doesn't even talk about Mueller anymore. If there was an impeachable offense in the Muller report then your party would have done it. Everything else you spew is irrelevant. You blame Barr, you blame this, you blame that. The fact is Mueller had nothing because there was nothing
I confront every truth in front of me. You on the other hand glom onto every phony conspiracy that the Democrat Media Industrial Complex puts in from you like a pavlovian dog. All because you are incapable of handling the fact that Trump beat Hillary.
Thats the fact jack
Link it up.
Just because you refuse to talk about it, doesn't mean it went away. How come Trump paid a pornstar off?
Cohen gave plenty with regard to Mueller.
You refusing to read the Mueller Report doesn't mean it's a nothingburger. You refusing to confront the contents of the Mueller report doesn't mean it's a nothingburger. It means you're a coward.
No you don't. You deny it or avoid it by refusing to talk about it. Then you say that it amounted to nothing because you refused to engage in it. You're a coward.
What's more likely? That there's a vast conspiracy involving thousands of people who undermined their own candidate in order to get Trump elected so they could go about the complex process of impeaching him, or that you're a dumb motherfucker who was grifted and are too ashamed or stupid to admit it?
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Doesn't seem like it.
Wait - so did he or didn't he fuck that pornstar?
As Mueller said, he couldn't indict the President. You'd know that if you read the Mueller report, which you still haven't done because you're a coward. How can you say there was nothing on Russian collusion when you haven't even read the Mueller Report?
Why haven't you read it?
Because you're a coward.
Barr's summary was a lie and Mueller told him that twice. Then Barr lied about Mueller telling him that.
Wait - so absence of action means Trump is innocent? How does that work? And why are you even talking about Mueller's report when you haven't read it because you're too scared to?
It only doesn't make sense because of your position that there are thousands of people who conspired to throw the election to Trump so that he could be impeached. That is your theory and it doesn't make sense, which is why the only other possible explanation for this is that you're a dumb motherfucker who was grifted by a conman.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Have you looked in APP for my prediction? Tell me you don't know how to do it. Tell me you are too stupid or too fucking lazy to do it and I will find it for you. But, you have to admit that first
I don't know whether he fucked a porn star or didn't fuck a porn star. Personally, I don't care. It isn't illegal is it? It isn't illegal to pay her off. Rich people pay people to sign NDAs all the time. You wouldn't know because you aren't rich and no rich person deems you important enough to pay you to sign one
Again, why do I need to read Mueller's report?
Yes, the democrat party's lack of inaction means Trump is innocent of "high crimes and misdemeanors" or they would have impeached him over it. Unless you are saying the democrat party is derelict in their duties. Is that what you are saying? Tell me what is what you are saying.
No, and I don't believe you ever made that prediction.
You first said you predicted that Trump would beat Hillary.
Then you moved the goalposts to say you predicted Trump would win those states, but winning those states alone doesn't mean you win the Presidency since you need 270 electoral votes.
So what you did is give yourself wiggle room within the parameters to make it sound like you were prescient enough to predict Trump would win the Electoral College but not the Popular Vote. But you never made that specific a prediction. So this is you trying to redefine the parameters to make yourself look more prescient post-hoc.