The Godless left showing their tolerance!

I know Jesus was aware of Roman colonialism, just as he was aware of thieving by the local rich. He was pointing to the way forward: a primitive form of socialism.

Why are you calling it colonialism?

No.. Jesus wasn't advocating socialism. Jewish laws of inheritance were far to strict for any form of socialism.

Look at Levirite marriage.
 
Just go by what the Bible says.. Ruth was a Moabite.. Ruth and Boaz were the parents of Obed who begat Jessie who begat David.

Read Ezra 10.. Until after the Babylonian exile Jewishness was NOT matrilineal.

Kudzu...if you were to ask ANY Jew, "Is the child of a Jewish woman a Jew?"...that Jew would say YES.

If you were to ask the same Jew, "Is the child of a Jewish man a Jew?"...some would say "yes"...some would say "probably"...some would say "maybe" and some would say, "How does one determine if the child is that of a Jewish man?"

So...insist if you must...

...BUT THE CHILD OF A JEWISH WOMAN IS A JEW.
 
Judah was a tributary of Rome.. If you understood ancient inheritance laws in Israel, you would not be claiming Jesus was a socialist.

As always, you seem to feel that Jesus's mission had no point whatever, other than to suggest interesting theological developments.
 
As always, you seem to feel that Jesus's mission had no point whatever, other than to suggest interesting theological developments.

Well, you're not Jewish as you have said, but this isn't about YOU. Jesus couldn't have been a socialist. He was a Jew and upheld Jewish law which included Jewish laws of inheritance.
 
Kudzu...if you were to ask ANY Jew, "Is the child of a Jewish woman a Jew?"...that Jew would say YES.

If you were to ask the same Jew, "Is the child of a Jewish man a Jew?"...some would say "yes"...some would say "probably"...some would say "maybe" and some would say, "How does one determine if the child is that of a Jewish man?"

So...insist if you must...

...BUT THE CHILD OF A JEWISH WOMAN IS A JEW.

Not before the Babylonian exile... Read Ezra 10.. Remember that Ruth was a Moahbite and she and Boaz were the parents of Obed who begat Jessi who begat David.

Remember also the forced conversion of the Edomites.
 
Jesus would spit in your face pal

I asked......he said he would not........however, he has been known to spit in his hand, mix it with dirt and spread it on a blind man's eyes, curing his blindness.......he did say he was ready to do the same for you if you are willing.......
 
1 Timothy 2:12 New King James Version (NKJV)

12 And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence.

translation error actually.......more correctly.......permit THAT woman.......discussing a member of Timothy's church who was causing dissension......
 
Two things, you can't answer a direct question and I doubt you have to guts to do any at my church.

As usual, a gutless coward that was raised by a gutless coward that was raised by a gutless coward . . . and so on.
They allow you in church? amazing. Do you use your favorite term there, or are you another phony that puts on an act?
 
Not before the Babylonian exile... Read Ezra 10.. Remember that Ruth was a Moahbite and she and Boaz were the parents of Obed who begat Jessi who begat David.

Remember also the forced conversion of the Edomites.

Kudzu...a JEW is defined as the offspring of a Jewish mother.

If your ego requires that you continue to deny it...be my guest.

If you keep posting your absurd denial here...I will respond to it.

Your original comment was: "All three Abrahamic religions are about patriarchy.. Descent is traced thru the male line and women have very few rights."

I took exception to that with, "I don't think so, Kudzu. For Jews...and child of a Jewish MOTHER is a Jew.
That is what defines Jews."

I stand by that totally.

This other bullshit you are bringing in has nothing to do with what we were (ARE) discussing.
 
Back
Top