The juju juice jabs in the news

Legion

Oderint dum metuant
NYC Mayor De Blasio Announces Private-Sector Vaccine Mandate



We're being gas-lit.

There is no "pandemic of the unvaccinated".

“Pandemic of the unvaccinated” is a propaganda ploy coined by Joe Biden's handlers and CDC director Rochelle Walensky.

“Pandemic of the unvaccinated” is an attractive slogan to hive-minded leftists because implicit in the phrase is the corresponding comfort that “the vaccinated” - i.e. themselves- were safe. They told each other "it’s not our pandemic any more; it’s theirs.

Here was an “us and them” narrative that would have made Trotsky and Goebbels proud.

Only it’s not true.

Fascist Führer Fauci's gain-of function funded turbocharged virus and it's rapidly developing mutations have the potential to make vaccinated individuals very sick.

So now the Faithful were taught a new lie to cling to: "Unless everyone is vaccinated, nobody is safe".

That's a lie, too.

Don't take my word for it.

Here's a Holy Link the left trusts implicitly:

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting-immunity-found-after-recovery-covid-19

Big Pharma shills and authoritarian bureaucrats and politicians who've acquired a taste for totalitarian control actually implored people to get jabbed with the juju juice even if they'd already had the Wu Flu:

https://www.healthline.com/health-n...ay-be-well-protected-vaccines-can-add-a-boost

Those who are too committed to the cause of the kooky kovid kult to quit are still bleating.

Don't believe me?

Exhibit A is Nerdsperg, an acolyte of the kooky kovid kult:

Unvxxed are getting Covid at a 6 to 1 ratio above the vaccinated.

Tell me; do your sources happen to mention that many of the "vaccinated" who aren't falling ill had the Chinese disease and recovered before they got jabbed with the juju juice?
 
This is not a pandemic of the unvaccinated

COVID is not the flu, and it is not Ebola.

These simple facts explain much of the confusion about our government’s response to the pandemic.

The ‘superpower’ which this virus has is that it is often highly contagious in people who have no significant symptoms.

Even in people who do get symptoms, they are most contagious at the time symptoms start, and for 24 hours prior to and following the onset of symptoms.

That is very different from the flu.

Almost all of the admonitions issued by our government would be very practical if this were a flu pandemic, because flu symptoms typically mount quickly and include fever by the time the flu victim is very contagious.

When a person feels bad and has a fever, wearing a mask and staying away from other people makes sense. Likewise, it is common sense for the people around the victim to be fastidious about hand washing and other hygiene measures.

It is not common sense to live perpetually in that state, unless we are in the midst of an epidemic of an Ebola-like disease that spreads very easily and has a very high mortality. (About 50% or more of Ebola patients die, regardless of age or previous health status).

It is easy to fall into the trap of thinking that COVID is like the flu. I was especially encouraged after the initial reports showed that the mRNA vaccines were 94-95% effective in preventing COVID, and the Moderna vaccine was 100% effective in preventing severe COVID in the trials.

I have been disappointed that my experience has taught me differently.

A recent article in the journal Lancet (November 20, 2021), titled “COVID-19: stigmatizing the unvaccinated is not justified,” makes some of these same points.

Stigmatization of the unvaccinated might be justified if COVID behaved like the flu; it doesn’t, and to continue to act as if it does is dangerous as well as idiotic.

Evolution of these viruses will always favor lineages that spread more easily and evade host defenses, whether natural or pharmaceutical.

The reason typically given for the complete dominance of the Delta variant is that it spreads more easily, because to admit that COVID is changing to evade our vaccines would be politically incorrect, or perhaps even ideologically suspect.

Omicron is different, and its differences point up yet another important piece of misinformation. We are told, “Every time COVID is passed from one person to another, there is a chance for mutation.”

That is another incorrect and frankly dangerous misunderstanding or falsehood.

Almost certainly the collection of mutations seen in Omicron were the result of a long-lasting COVID infection within one person. Very likely this was someone who had some type of immunosuppression, such as HIV, and took one or more COVID vaccines or treatments (possibly convalescent plasma). Each one of these acted as an evolutionary pressure, thinning the viral population so that the only virus remaining after each treatment/vaccine were immune to that vaccine or therapy. Omicron has several mutations that are typical of rapidly spreading variants, and it has a mutation that has not been seen previously in the wild: E484A.

We know that E484K in the Beta variant results in substantial or complete evasion of all of our current vaccines, and may cause diminished effectiveness of our most commonly used monoclonal antibody therapies (produced by Regeneron and Eli Lily). In the March 10, 2021 edition of the journal Cell Host & Microbe, Zhuoming Liu et. al describe their efforts to predict and verify which potential mutations could be problematic; they indicate that E484A would likely cause diminished effectiveness of natural immunity. It would likely be otherwise equivalent to the E484K substitution.

It is worth noting that the spike protein on the surface of the viral particle which is responsible for COVID is the location of not only E484, but of all of the targets for the first generation of approved COVID therapeutics. There are a few different ‘handholds’ where antibodies can ‘grab on.’ Natural immunity utilizes several other sites for antibodies to grab, and natural immunity also utilizes cellular immunity that doesn’t require a handhold. The repurposed drugs that have been found to be useful in COVID include inhaled budesonide and the antidepressants fluvoxamine and fluoxetine (Prozac).

There is also evidence that hydroxychloroquine as well as ivermectin, colchicine and some antibiotics have some effectiveness, in addition to zinc and melatonin and vitamins C and D. All of these substances, as well as the new drugs discussed below, are likely to have maintained therapeutic benefit against Omicron.

I think that we have all begun to understand that “every form of refuge has its price.”



Dr. Bradly Bundrant is a physician at Ballinger Memorial Hospital


https://news.yahoo.com/not-pandemic-unvaccinated-145833267.html
 
Here's why the 'pandemic of the unvaccinated' narrative is wrong

71cLgUqNZIL._SX300_.jpg




We treat COVID patients. Here's why the 'pandemic of the unvaccinated' narrative is wrong.

If you watch the news, chances are you’ve heard all of this can be resolved based on the behavior of just one group of people.

You’ve probably heard that we have entered a new era called “the pandemic of the unvaccinated.”

As advocates for public health, registered nurses want to be extremely clear: There is no such thing as a pandemic of the unvaccinated.

Bonnie Castillo is executive director of National Nurses United, which is the largest organization of registered nurses in the United States.










https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/we-treat-covid-patients-heres-why-the-pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated-narrative-is-wrong/ar-AAOve2H
 
Questioning a catchphrase: 'Pandemic of the unvaccinated'


Coronavirus has been labeled a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” by government officials from Joe Biden on down.

But the term doesn’t appear to be changing the hearts and minds of unvaccinated people. And it doesn’t tell the whole story, with breakthrough infections occurring among the fully vaccinated.

Said Dr. Eric Topol, professor of molecular medicine at Scripps Research in La Jolla, California, “The pandemic clearly involves all people, not just the unvaccinated. We should not partition them as the exclusive problem.”

Calling it a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” is “just provocative,” said Robert Blendon, who follows public opinion on health care at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

In a pandemic no one is an island, suggests Dr. Leana Wen, a former Baltimore health commissioner and commentator on public health issues.

“Stating it's a pandemic of the unvaccinated implies that if you are vaccinated, you are protected, and that is not the case. You are likely to contract COVID and spread it to others, even if you are vaccinated.”



https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/sound-bite-reexamined-pandemic-unvaccinated-79760265
 
And now we got the same lame bullshit initiated originally by Tucker making its umpteenth appearence, and I am sure we will see it umpteenth more times again, been there, done that, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it .............
 
And now we got the same lame bullshit initiated originally by Tucker making its umpteenth appearence, and I am sure we will see it umpteenth more times again, been there, done that, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it .............

Follow the evidence and the science.

Think critically and rationally.
 
Follow the evidence and the science.

Think critically and rationally.

Have, and not those introducing bits and pieces here and there hoping to create a false paradigm

Yes those vaccinated can catch the virus, and spread the virus, but if you are vaccinated your chances of doing either is diminished greatly compared to those unvaccinated, common sense tells one who is keeping the virus going. If you need proof, check the hospitalization and death rates of those areas expericing severe Delta
 
Have, and not those introducing bits and pieces here and there hoping to create a false paradigm

Yes those vaccinated can catch the virus, and spread the virus, but if you are vaccinated your chances of doing either is diminished greatly compared to those unvaccinated, common sense tells one who is keeping the virus going. If you need proof, check the hospitalization and death rates of those areas expericing severe Delta

Your information is bad.
 
Your information is bad.

I am just following the reality:

Unvaccinated residents filling Michigan hospitals
https://www.uppermichiganssource.co...ichigan-hospitals-getting-hospitalized-covid/

Immunizations are keeping the majority of vaccinated people out of the hospital
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/covid-coronavirus-vaccines-hospital-cases-rates-unvaccinated

Surge of unvaccinated COVID-19 patients straining hospitals
https://wtop.com/coronavirus/2021/09/surge-of-unvaccinated-covid-19-patients-straining-hospitals/

They’re clogging our hospitals
https://www.kktv.com/2021/11/04/no-...-frustration-remaining-unvaccinated-citizens/

ICU is full of the unvaccinated
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...cinated-my-patience-with-them-is-wearing-thin

US hospitals are filled with unvaccinated people
https://www.businessinsider.com/cov...cu-beds-cdc-director-rochelle-walensky-2021-9

Unvaccinated COVID-19 patients filling up hospitals
https://www.wric.com/news/virginia-news/watch-live-gov-northam-to-provide-covid-19-update/

Nearly All COVID Hospital Patients Unvaccinated
https://omahadailyrecord.com/content/nearly-all-nebraska-covid-hospital-patients-unvaccinated

Hospitals Filling Up With 30-To-50 Year Old Unvaccinated Patients
https://www.ideastream.org/news/ohi...-with-30-to-50-year-old-unvaccinated-patients

https://www.fox43.com/article/news/...eath/521-6b1869b7-9348-41fc-870b-3c3c216697a1
https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covi...hospitalized-2021-covid-patients-unvaccinated
https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-cov...st-the-u-s-health-system-billions-of-dollars/
https://mynews4.com/news/local/most...y-unvaccinated-covid-19-patients-filling-beds
 
It is pretty clear that this fucker does not know how to think.

Poor Anchovies.

Ask any of the juju juice junkies if their sources happen to mention that many of the "vaccinated" who aren't falling ill had the Chinese disease and recovered before they got jabbed with the juju juice.

Then watch them scramble.
 
The media is reality?

Poor Anchovies.

Ah, your topic post is a media report, duh, and the ones I included proving you and the other guy wrong are all referencing medical or hospital sources, sucks being so easily proven wrong doesn’t it
 
Ah, your topic post is a media report, duh, and the ones I included proving you and the other guy wrong are all referencing medical or hospital sources, sucks being so easily proven wrong doesn’t it

I am not so sure that you are capable of thinking yourself out of a paper bag.
 
Infection with SARS-CoV-2 provides substantial natural immunity against reinfection.

Recent studies have shown strong waning of the immunity provided by the BNT162b2 vaccine.

The time course of natural and hybrid immunity is unknown.

METHODS

Data on confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections were extracted from the Israeli Ministry of Health database for the period August to September 2021 regarding all persons previously infected or vaccinated.

We compared infection rates as a function of time since the last immunity-conferring event using Poisson regression, adjusting for possible confounding factors.

RESULTS

Confirmed infection rates increased according to time elapsed since the last immunity-conferring event in all cohorts.

For unvaccinated previously infected individuals they increased from 10.5 per 100,000 risk-days for those previously infected 4-6 months ago to 30.2 for those previously infected over a year ago.

For individuals receiving a single dose following prior infection they increased from 3.7 per 100,000 person days among those vaccinated in the past two months to 11.6 for those vaccinated over 6 months ago.

For vaccinated previously uninfected individuals the rate per 100,000 person days increased from 21.1 for persons vaccinated within the first two months to 88.9 for those vaccinated more than 6 months ago.

CONCLUSIONS

Protection from reinfection decreases with time since previous infection, but is, nevertheless, higher than that conferred by vaccination with two doses at a similar time since the last immunity-conferring event.





https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.04.21267114v1
 
Back
Top