The juju juice jabs in the news
- Thread starter Legion
- Start date
Twitler says, "This media is presented out of context".
The Chinese are so much better at propaganda than the NAZI's were, which is extraordinary.
THey have really put in the work, plus this claim that the Chinese cant innovate is pure BS.
Well, nothing personal, but it is quite noticeable you offered nothing but personal insulted to invalidate that which I posted proving you incorrect so it’s best you look into the mirror for those incapable of thinking
Poor Anchovies.
Oh, “Hawkeye” is another “copy and paste” pseudonym? We’re getting to the point where we’re going to need a scorecard to keep up, but matters little, he’s usually wrong no matter what the name
Poor Anchovies.
Pfizer wants more money, and they want it quickly
CDC director confirms FDA in talks to streamline authorization of omicron-specific juju juice
The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was in discussions to streamline the authorization of an omicron-specific juju juice jab.
FDA acting commissioner, Janet Woodcock said, "Historically, the work to obtain the genetic information and patient samples for variants and then perform the testing needed to evaluate their impact takes time. However, we expect the vast majority of this work to be completed in the coming weeks."
https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/584387-cdc-director-confirms-fda-in-discussion-to-streamline
CDC director confirms FDA in talks to streamline authorization of omicron-specific juju juice
The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was in discussions to streamline the authorization of an omicron-specific juju juice jab.
FDA acting commissioner, Janet Woodcock said, "Historically, the work to obtain the genetic information and patient samples for variants and then perform the testing needed to evaluate their impact takes time. However, we expect the vast majority of this work to be completed in the coming weeks."
https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/584387-cdc-director-confirms-fda-in-discussion-to-streamline
‘Wall of secrecy’ in Pfizer contracts as company accused of profiteering
Tom Frieden, who was director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under Barack Obama, said: “If you’re just focusing on maximizing your profits and you’re a vaccine manufacturer, you are profiteering.”
The US multinational faces growing scrutiny over the scale of its profits.
While AstraZeneca agreed to sell its vaccine at cost during the pandemic, Pfizer wanted profits.
The Pfizer/BioNTech juju juice jab, which now has the brand name Comirnaty, will be one of the most lucrative drugs in pharmaceutical history.
Pfizer says its profit margins as a percentage before tax are in the “high-20s”.
Pfizer expects to deliver 2.3 billion juju juice jabs this year with predicted revenues of $36 billion.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/dec/05/wall-of-secrecy-in-pfizer-contracts-as-company-accused-of-profiteering
Tom Frieden, who was director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under Barack Obama, said: “If you’re just focusing on maximizing your profits and you’re a vaccine manufacturer, you are profiteering.”
The US multinational faces growing scrutiny over the scale of its profits.
While AstraZeneca agreed to sell its vaccine at cost during the pandemic, Pfizer wanted profits.
The Pfizer/BioNTech juju juice jab, which now has the brand name Comirnaty, will be one of the most lucrative drugs in pharmaceutical history.
Pfizer says its profit margins as a percentage before tax are in the “high-20s”.
Pfizer expects to deliver 2.3 billion juju juice jabs this year with predicted revenues of $36 billion.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/dec/05/wall-of-secrecy-in-pfizer-contracts-as-company-accused-of-profiteering
Guess who pays for all those billions of juju juice jabs
HERE'S A HINT: IT'S NOT HIM
The simple answer is that mostly we pay, or rather, the government does through our tax dollars, (though insurance companies and hospitals have also been assuming some costs).
Following that money as it wends its way through the system is far less simple though, and it also raises the question of who owns the rights to the juju juice and what’s a fair rate of return for a product that was funded to a large degree by public dollars.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/guess-who-pays-for-all-those-millions-of-covid-vaccines-105713330.html
HERE'S A HINT: IT'S NOT HIM
The simple answer is that mostly we pay, or rather, the government does through our tax dollars, (though insurance companies and hospitals have also been assuming some costs).
Following that money as it wends its way through the system is far less simple though, and it also raises the question of who owns the rights to the juju juice and what’s a fair rate of return for a product that was funded to a large degree by public dollars.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/guess-who-pays-for-all-those-millions-of-covid-vaccines-105713330.html
Senior FDA staff members resigned over political pressure to approve boosters. Why is no one discussing this?
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/31/us/politics/fda-vaccine-regulators-booster-shots.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/31/us/politics/fda-vaccine-regulators-booster-shots.html
Pfizer will provide no jabs to any country that does not provide complete immunity from claims of harm. There are also contracts that stipulate that the buyer run pro Pfizer propaganda.
Why is no one discussing this?
No, this came across my grapevine va Twitter feeds that watch a couple of months ago. THis will get you started:
https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/1016130.html
Pfizer Inc., the US-based manufacturer of the COVID-19 vaccine, took advantage of its near-monopoly and other countries’ desperation to impose unfair contracts on them, a new report shows.
On Tuesday, Public Citizen, a consumer rights advocacy group in the US, disclosed a number of unfair clauses in secret contracts that Pfizer reached with Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, the Dominican Republic, the EU, Peru, the US and the UK.
One of the most serious issues with the contracts highlighted in Public Citizen’s report, was the waiver of sovereign immunity, the principle of international law that a state’s decisions are not subject to jurisdiction by foreign courts. In contracts with Pfizer, the governments of Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, and Peru promised to waive sovereign immunity in the event of legal disputes. With the exception of Peru, all these states agreed to give up “immunity against precautionary seizure of any of [their] assets.”
Several contracts also stipulated that disputes would be dealt with not in an official court, but by arbitration under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce and the law of New York, where Pfizer headquarters is located.
Furthermore, Pfizer’s contracts banned those countries from purchasing or otherwise receiving its vaccine from third parties. The contract with Brazil, to take one example, restricts Brazil “from accepting Pfizer vaccine donations from other countries or buying Pfizer vaccines from others without Pfizer’s permission,” Public Citizen said in its report.
Another unreasonable part of the contracts was that they make governments responsible for potential breaches of intellectual property (IP) rights. Pfizer’s contract with Colombia requires the government to “foot the bill” if a third party claims IP violations in regard to the development, manufacture or sale of Pfizer’s vaccine.
“Pfizer also explicitly says that it does not guarantee that its product does not violate third-party IP,” the report said.
Another difference with ordinary contracts is language absolving Pfizer from responsibility for disruptions to the supply schedule. Contracts with Brazil and Colombia state that the governments “shall be deemed to agree to any revision.”
Pfizer’s contracts with several countries also include clauses that either absolve or minimize the company’s legal responsibility. The company managed to secure a commitment from these countries to keep the contracts in strict confidentiality, presumably out of concern about blowback from its rivals or the public.
Pfizer objected to the report, saying that it “has absolutely no intention of interfering with any country’s diplomatic, military, or culturally significant assets.”
But Peter Maybarduk, director of Public Citizen’s Access to Medicines program, said that Pfizer used “its control of scarce vaccines to win special privileges from people that have little choice.”
https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/1016130.html