The language re Hillary v the language v Trump...

[Jarod]

Regarding HRC... No reasonable prosecutor would file charges.


Regarding Trump.... “The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“


Yet according to Rumppers HRC is GUILTY and Rump is Exonerated.

 

[dukkha]

Regarding HRC... No reasonable prosecutor would file charges.


Regarding Trump.... “The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“


Yet according to Rumppers HRC is GUILTY and Rump is Exonerated.

what? who said she was guilty? there is certainly an exhibition written by Comey that she was "gross negligent"
but Strzok re-wrote it to "extreme carelessness" so not to indict her

 

[Jarod]

what? who said she was guilty? there is certainly an exhibition written by Comey that she was "gross negligent"
but Strzok re-wrote it to "extreme carelessness" so not to indict her

You don’t say she is a criminal?

 

[dukkha]

You don’t say she is a criminal?

yes I said she is a criminal,among other worse characteristics like serial liar and warmonger.
But she wasn't found guilty - i'm not a judge

 

[Jarod]

yes I said she is a criminal,among other worse characteristics like serial liar and warmonger.
But she wasn't found guilty - i'm not a judge

I feel the same way about Rump, other than warmonger.

 

[evince]

the war monger part is coming


the right believes whatever backs the lies fox tells them

 

[Teflon Don]

Regarding HRC... No reasonable prosecutor would file charges.


Regarding Trump.... “The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“


Yet according to Rumppers HRC is GUILTY and Rump is Exonerated.

Is this you accepting the outcome

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Regarding HRC... No reasonable prosecutor would file charges.


Regarding Trump.... “The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“


Yet according to Rumppers HRC is GUILTY and Rump is Exonerated.

Isn't that amazing?

 

[Truth Detector]

Regarding HRC... No reasonable prosecutor would file charges.

Regarding Trump.... “The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“

Yet according to Rumppers HRC is GUILTY and Rump is Exonerated.

The tears that are being shed by the left over the final Mueller report are quite predictable.

There is ZERO evidence of any collusion. The entire narrative regarding that is laughably stupid. Only desperate partisan hacks could believe such stupidity.

There was NEVER any evidence of obstruction. ZERO. That entire narrative regarding that is laughably stupid. Only desperate partisan hacks could believe such stupidity.

With Hillary there is a MOUNTAIN of evidence that she did indeed use her PRIVATE server to conduct the PEOPLE's business. That she did indeed conduct that business on private cell phones, some of which she destroyed. That she did indeed receive and transmit Classified information over those UNSECURED servers after LYING about it.

I know you want to move goalposts and cry and flail and pretend that you weren't a fucking clueless idiot for the last 24 months thinking that there was a THERE there.

 

[Jarod]

Is this you accepting the outcome

I believe there is no evidence of collusion, if that is what you are asking.

 

[Teflon Don]

I believe there is no evidence of collusion, if that is what you are asking.

Doesn’t sound like you are accepting this and moving on

 

[MAGA MAN]

Regarding HRC... No reasonable prosecutor would file charges.


Regarding Trump.... “The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“


Yet according to Rumppers HRC is GUILTY and Rump is Exonerated.

Because "reasonable" is a lie.

 

[Truth Detector]

I believe there is no evidence of collusion, if that is what you are asking.

Then why assign a Special Council to investigate it for two years and $25 million? Why read daily accounts from the FAKE media about how Trump won with the help of the Russians?

This is a massive cluster fuck promoted by the Democratic Party of the Jackass and the FAKE media; both of which refused to accept the results of an election where their predictions of a Hillary landslide fell incredibly short.

 

[Moosakofsky]

Regarding HRC... No reasonable prosecutor would file charges.


Regarding Trump.... “The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“
.

So it was a waste of time.
If I was working on something for two yrs I'd at least come up with a conclusion.

 

[Jarod]

Because "reasonable" is a lie.

Ya, you are the expert.

 

[Jarod]

So it was a waste of time.
If I was working on something for two yrs I'd at least come up with a conclusion.

Even if no conclusion were warranted?

 

[Jarod]

So it was a waste of time.
If I was working on something for two yrs I'd at least come up with a conclusion.

Not a waste to ensure that presidents know they are being watched and held accountable for their actions.

 

[Moosakofsky]

Even if no conclusion were warranted?

After two yrs I'd say yes, a conclusion was. But " no conclusion" tells me there was one

 

[Jarod]

After two yrs I'd say yes, a conclusion was. But " no conclusion" tells me there was one

Keep telling yourself that, I don't care. You are a silly person.

 

[Teflon Don]

Does this finally prove that the Steele Dossier was a fraud