Kavanaugh is a repeat offender. Deal with it, RWNJ.
Proof?
Kavanaugh is a repeat offender. Deal with it, RWNJ.
Indeed, Cindy, sensitive types like you almost always are.
Pweeze stawp cywing.

I understand that any woman's rape allegation is automatically dismissed unless it happens in the sight of four disinterested witnesses.
Fact? A book? By a drunk? You consider that facts? No wonder no one respects dumb Democrats.

He was sober when he wrote it. Looks to me like you're trying to convince yourself that nobody's telling the truth about Kavanaugh except other RWNJs.![]()
Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
I understand that any woman's rape allegation is automatically dismissed unless it happens in the sight of four disinterested witnesses.
He's supposed to vote with the law, not the left or right.
That's not treating him cruelly, stupd girl. There are legit claims of criminality and egregious alcoholism on the part of Bretty-kins.
That you can't face that fact just makes you as big a pussy as he is.
I already gave you facts and you've chosen to disregard them.
Just be honest and admit that RWNJs wouldn't accept any criticism of Kavanaugh even if it was from the lips of Jesus.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/poli...gations-senate-judiciary-committee/index.htmlCertainly nothing that O'Kavanaugh supporters need or want.![]()
Legit, as in supported by facts?
Yes. Statements by those who knew and socialized with him.
Duh.
You should try calling Ballsy Ford. You might get a piece of pussy once in your life.
Your fear has followed you to this thread, boy. Nothing like mocking a nigger like you.
Indeed.A constellation of left-wing activist groups cooked up a series of outlandish lies designed to keep Brett Kavanaugh off the Supreme Court. The national news media, as you will remember, joined the smear campaign. They repeated and magnified the slurs. But in the end, it was to no effect. Kavanaugh was confirmed anyway. Why? Because not a single allegation against him was proven to be true.
Not one. Their only lasting effect was to traumatize Kavanaugh’s wife and children. To this day, the left has never apologized for their dishonesty or their profound cruelty. They did not accept defeat. They never do. Why? Because when politics is your religion, acknowledging reality looks like sin, and so it continues.
President David Rubenstein and NBA Commissioner Adam Silver about the state of the NBA and professional sports during and event hosted by the Economic Club of Washington, D.C. at the Capitol Hilton on May 9, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)
A few days ago, New York Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly were the toast of the left. Their new book appeared to finish the job that the national media started a year ago and take out Kavanaugh for good. The authors accused Kavanaugh of committing sexual assault as a student at Yale more than 30 years ago. Details were sparse, but it was enough to launch a tsunami of rage from the left. Chatters on cable TV denounced Kavanaugh as a gang rapist. The leading Democrats running for president demanded that Kavanaugh be impeached and removed from office.
Almost immediately, the story fell apart. The newspaper was forced to make a devastating correction to the piece. In fact, the woman that Kavanaugh supposedly attacked didn’t remember anything about the event. And just like so many previous stories about Kavanaugh, the whole thing turned out to be a crock. (RELATED: NYT Reporter Promotes Attempt To Blame Fox News For Kavanaugh Hit Piece)
The Times reporters were grilled by other news outlets. The explanation? Don’t blame us; blame our editors. But a missing line is not the only problem with the story.
Where did the story come from? It came secondhand from a single classmate of Kavanaugh’s, a man who worked as a left-wing activist and later for the Clintons. Of course, 20 years ago, no credible news organization would have run a story like that on the basis of its sourcing. The Times didn’t hesitate, and it was picked up everywhere. When a character-destroying smear comes from political activists rather than from, say, ordinary citizens, you ought to be able to know that from reading the piece. The Times disagrees, though. They don’t think you have a right to that context.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/19/...ush&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push
Kav has never been treated cruelly, you pathetic cunt.
Tucker Carlson?"
Brett imploded the day he accepted Trump's nomination, then again, during his beer barfing days, he is a preppy framed by the Heritage Foundation and picked to be Trump's lackey on the Supreme Court, even Roberts expressed concern on his ability to be a Justice
Still mocking you. Because you're a stupid nigger, you can't tell.