The right to bear Arms? Not necefsarily.

They weren't a ' significant contributing factor ' to the extermination of the 'buffalo ' as a vital Native American food-source. That particular culture was destroyed by more advanced weaponry in the hands of more advanced morons- just as modern American culture is undermined by more ' advanced ' weaponry today.

WTF does Buffalo have to do with our revolutionary war?
You once again prove your stupidity.
 
WTF does Buffalo have to do with our revolutionary war?
You once again prove your stupidity.

Dolt. The concern is with TODAY's gun laws. This is a CURRENT EVENTS forum and I am hauling your myopic ass back on track- with a highly relevant FACT.
 
Yes. I say that we should not have guns. Does that mean you are not allowed guns? Or can you understand my opinion does not threaten your guns? Probably not. You can sleep well hugging your ARs. Nobody is taking them away.

You are such an aggressive child. A day without threatening people on line, is a day not worth living for you. Relax, we are all impressed by your tough guy posts.

Yet I still have something you say I shouldn't have. In the end, I win and you're still the same fucking loser you were when your mother squirted you out of her stank pussy.
 
Yet I still have something you say I shouldn't have. In the end, I win and you're still the same fucking loser you were when your mother squirted you out of her stank pussy.

Geez, another eurotophobe.

US girls pity you.
 
[FONT=&][/FONT]
[FONT=&]I love what the Founders wrote. I even use a capital ‘F’ when referring to them. Languages change over time, and some of the meaning is lost on new generations, who need a translation to explain the meaning. In this case, here is the original wording (which I love), and the modern translation:

[/FONT]
[FONT=&]A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.[/FONT]

[FONT=&]Translation:[/FONT]
[FONT=&]A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State (the right of the people to keep and bear Arms), shall not be infringed.[/FONT]

​

[FONT=&]I’m not suggesting for a minute that the original be replaced. In fact, it should be reinstated, since its ratified version was an error filled copy. No, restore the original but always tell people what it means, using the translation.[/FONT]



[FONT=&]What’s wrong with talking about what the Founders meant? Gun nuts hate it when people do that because they know the Founders would be against Homer Simpsons buying AR15s.[/FONT]

How do we know the Founders would have been against the AR-15? That's pure speculation from yet another gun hating POS.
 
How do we know the Founders would have been against the AR-15? That's pure speculation from yet another gun hating POS.

Suppose that the Founders were wankers ? That hadn't occurred to you, had it.
 
What makes you think they were Kanadians or Palasimians??

So you think that they were ' pure-blood '....er.....what ?

You- no doubt- think that your ' god ' is an old white guy with a beard.
But then you're an established forum racist.
 
Covered three times above. Yes he was.

Which post did you cover it in? He was not.

Madison wrote the second and the rest of the bill of rights which were edited and debated by Congress. None of your fictions matter anyway since Congress approved the final language.
 
Yeah, that's what you said about legion troll.

Are you just a sock of the troll or do you prefer circle jerks to truth.

It's too bad this place has been ruined with all the games.

Jefferson had no part in crafting the second.
 
Yeah, that's what you said about legion troll.

Are you just a sock of the troll or do you prefer circle jerks to truth.

It's too bad this place has been ruined with all the games.

Jefferson had no part in crafting the second.

None of the gun hating assholes on this forum did yet they seem to think they can determine what those that wrote the amendment had in mind when they wrote it.
 
So you think that they were ' pure-blood '....er.....what ?

You- no doubt- think that your ' god ' is an old white guy with a beard.
But then you're an established forum racist.

Is that what I believe??

And once again; the Kanadian Palasimian racist, accuses others of his own behavior. :palm:
 
Is that what I believe??

And once again; the Kanadian Palasimian racist, accuses others of his own behavior. :palm:

Once more then- for your further embarrassment-

So you think that they were ' pure-blood '....er.....what ?

You- no doubt- think that your ' god ' is an old white guy with a beard.
But then you're an established forum racist.
 
Once more then- for your further embarrassment-

So you think that they were ' pure-blood '....er.....what ?

You- no doubt- think that your ' god ' is an old white guy with a beard.
But then you're an established forum racist.

Is that what I believe??

And once again; the Kanadian Palasimian racist, accuses others of his own behavior. :palm:
 
Moron. At least one of the Founding Fathers wasn't even born in America.

You're a know-nothing troll.
 
Back
Top