]2epo]v[an
Banned
No, I literally think you're stupid.
The shooting death of Chad Read
- Thread starter ]2epo]v[an
- Start date
No, I literally think you're stupid.
This coming from a man whom keeps using word(s) - over and over again - even though he appears to not even know what some of them mean.
Whatever pal.
Have a nice day.
]2epo]v[an
Banned
Words don't actually mean anything at all. Words have no meaning of their own. If Words had meaning, anyone would be able to read them regardless of what language they speak. You just can't stop puking nonsense, can you.
Sure as fuck can't stay on topic.
I just think you're a stupid faggot asking a stupid faggot question and can't field a contextual argument at all. And I think that was already abundently clear to everyone besides you.
Sure as fuck can't stay on topic.
I just think you're a stupid faggot asking a stupid faggot question and can't field a contextual argument at all. And I think that was already abundently clear to everyone besides you.
All justifiable homicides(except executions and war) grow out of self defense, or defense of others. Even states that allow shooting of trespassers do so only when they can conceivably be a life and death threat. It must also be such an immediate threat that you cannot wait for law enforcement, or a court hearing.
Having your feelings hurt does not make for a justifiable homicide. Both sides of this domestic dispute hurt the others feelings, but only one side committed murder. If he was defending himself against a possible death, then yes, it is self defense... But if it is just having his feelings hurt, as you say, it is murder.
According to your interpretation of the law, McRocket can legally kill you now.
]2epo]v[an
Banned
Can he? Easy thing to say. Lil trickier to do.
]2epo]v[an
Banned
Not exactly, there is a reasonable person standard for the level of shit you should be expected to put up with on your own property when a person refuses to leave. True, chad didn't punch the guy, but he did throw him of his own porch and it was in no way consensual. It was not a mutually accepted fight. Chad was clearly suicidal to do what he did. He did make a thread, can't quite tell if that threat amounted to "ill kill you" but it could be construed without much twisting. Who knows if he'd come back at ya later. If someone says "I'll kill you" it's pretty much a freebie execution notice and you can put them down on the spot. Armed or not. Waiting for it or not. Guy was a felon. You don't get to go on someone's property, not leave when told, and physically intimidate someone on their own property. Chad wouldn't leave, tried to take Kyle's dignity and upset his peace of mind, he spoke a threat and dared the shooter to kill him. Now I'm sorry Chad cared so little about his life but caring so little about his own life, how could the shooter be expected to care more about Chad's life than chad.
No one should have to put up with that shit on his own land.
There really is not. I cannot murder trump, because I find him annoying.
]2epo]v[an
Banned
Contrary to popular belief, it isn't just a hazard likely to result in death, that gives you the right to use lethal force. You can also use self defense to protect yourself from injury or to protect property. That's one of the reasons I keep repeating, "on your own land."
]2epo]v[an
Banned
You're missing the synergies of all the things chad did wrong. Perhaps if chad only did one of them that would be different. He did just about everything to get himself shot and seemingly would have it no other way. No one should have to put up with that and I think that's reasonable. Is Trump on your land, refusing to leave, physically intimidating you, insulting you in homophilic verse, and possibly threatening to kill you and daring you to do it? If he were, I think you'd have a case. Note, no charges have been filed. Case dismissed as justified at pretrial.
]2epo]v[an
Banned
I charge that no one has a protected right to entrap a wrongful death suit by the actions taken by the decedent.
Essentially daring the shooter to shoot
Issuing threats
Insulting in homophilic verse
Use of physical intimidation
And
Unlawfully displacing a private occupant on his own property
If a jury wont even be the ones who will decide the case and it doesn't even move forward, I charge that the shooter acted under a reasonable person's threshold when shooting and killing the decedent.
Essentially daring the shooter to shoot
Issuing threats
Insulting in homophilic verse
Use of physical intimidation
And
Unlawfully displacing a private occupant on his own property
If a jury wont even be the ones who will decide the case and it doesn't even move forward, I charge that the shooter acted under a reasonable person's threshold when shooting and killing the decedent.
Seriously, Einstein? You're going to fire straight up or straight down?
How about this; don't point a gun unless you intend to use it and if you use it, shoot to kill. No warning shots.
]2epo]v[an
Banned
No fucktard, not straight up or down, only straight down. The bullet splatters harmlessly.
]2epo]v[an
Banned
Thats just stupid and piggish. Theres nothing wrong with warning shots except to the pig unions, for whom you're obviously a stooge, as was reliably predicated.
But let me ask ya something. As a pig, whats your opinion about states mandating shoot to incapacitate training for their officers instead of tripple tap center mass only training/policy?
Last edited:
]2epo]v[an
Banned
The other day i was out just having a cig walking at night and a dog came up on me looking for trouble. It was about to attack. I poped off a warning shot into the street just like i said to do. Dog ran like a bitch.
By your opinion i should have just killed the dog. Between your pig union opinion and my better judgment, which one ended the confrontation with no one having to explain anything to anyone?
Now, you're saying i shouldn't give as much respect for a perp than I'd give to a dog?
By your opinion i should have just killed the dog. Between your pig union opinion and my better judgment, which one ended the confrontation with no one having to explain anything to anyone?
Now, you're saying i shouldn't give as much respect for a perp than I'd give to a dog?
Last edited:
]2epo]v[an
Banned
Another reason for a 90 degree warning shot into an improved surface, besides the safty of the bullet splattering harmlessly, it also shows exactly where you were standing when you had to use it. Helps for very valuable and easy facts to establish of what happened if you have to. There isnt always someone there with a cellphone.
Warning shots should always be an option and left to the users better situational discretion, not to some arbitrary legislation by pig union policy.
Warning shots should always be an option and left to the users better situational discretion, not to some arbitrary legislation by pig union policy.
Last edited:
You're as insane as Sybil. Soon you'll be reduced to posting "Bulverism. Piggish insults" 20 times a day. Since you've refused to answer my questions, there is zero gain in answering yours. Get some help, psycho, before you end up getting yourself hurt doing something nutty.
Blackcat13th
Banned
How was your butt fucker idiot question not answered? You asked if he should shoot upwards and he correctly said you were a fagot pig. What else did you really want for your whorish police union propaganda?
Blackcat13th
Banned
The questions you're deflecting, like a little bitch.
Should he not give a perp the same respect for life he'd give to a dog?
Isnt it better when no one has to explain anything to anyone? A lazy bitch like you would love not to have to answer simple questions let alone write a report that goes no where anyway.
Should he not give a perp the same respect for life he'd give to a dog?
Isnt it better when no one has to explain anything to anyone? A lazy bitch like you would love not to have to answer simple questions let alone write a report that goes no where anyway.