Cancel 2020.2
Canceled
You're just tutu funny!
Ha-ha! I bet "archie" archives DOES wear a tutu on a regular basis...............
You're just tutu funny!
What in the hell is the "YIMBY movement?" I thought you were referring to the source I employed in the offset
And again, I don't live in California, but I was always under the impression mass transit isn't, nor was never, a priority of anyone in California, left or right, wasn't all recent efforts attacked and forgotten due to heavy cynicism
Yeah, we got it, they are suppose to go into the forest every year and rake in between the trees
And it has happened every year, but not at the escalating level that it has in the last decade, this year being the worse, and I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but there is a reason why all the overgrowth is so dry and easy kindle for sperading fires
Arsecheese is incapable of understanding subtle arguments like that.
California and Oregon is a blue states. Rest assured they have been in constant contact with the WH about handouts, even before the fires broke out.
Is anyone mentioning *why* it is on fire though lol?
Controlled BurningSo tell us, does West Virginia have an extensive "forest management" program in place? And what WV has to deal with is minor compared to the West Coast States facing their problems today
And you are missing the point, responding to a disaster effecting an entire section of the country by blaming them isn't what Presidents do, it would be like telling the Gulf States suffering from flooding during a hurricane don't expect recognition from your Government cause your levees weren't high enough
It refers to 'YES In My Backyard'. It's basically progressives who are for building new housing and in opposition to the NIMBY movement. (Check out the guy's twitter bio I posted).
In SF all we talk about is mass transit and trying to get people out of cars. And it's been a huge battle for decades in the Bay Area trying to build housing along the BART and Caltrain lines and local communities fighting against it. When that doesn't happen you have people building further and further out and ultimately into these fire hazard areas. So it's all tied together to what's happening right now.
he going there tomorrow i think
Controlled Burning
The Daniel Boone National Forest uses controlled burning and mechanical treatments to reduce the risk of wildland fire, improve wildlife habitat and riparian zones, control noxious weeds and improve watershed and range conditions in eastern Kentucky.
History
The historic suppression of fire has resulted in a lack of periodic, natural fire in our forest. The absence of these low intensity fires has increased the risk of large fire events and has negatively impacted the health of our forests. As part of an effort to use fire as a resource management tool, the Daniel Boone National Forest is reviewing existing resource management and fire management plans to develop an integrated fire planning strategy.
Controlled fires are used on public lands in order to improve forest health, and reduce large wildfires.
https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/dbnf/home/?cid=stelprdb5281464
___________
DB Forest is in eastern Kentucky but it’s essentially all the same Appalachian forest. One of my buddies is in forest management in WV and they do controlled burns as a matter of practice.
Healthy trees are resistant to small fires. Maybe you’re a city slicker and you don’t know this lol, but it take *a lot* of heat to get green wood to burn. Green wood—even in CA, has a lot of water content, so it won’t burn until the water is converted to steam.
But when it starts to burn, watch out.
So basically, leaves and small amounts of brush can burn right through a stand of mature and healthy trees without harming them. After all the fuel is consumed there’s little to no risk of a big fire down the road.
Why they don’t do this in CA is beyond me. Probably something to do with the triple crested speckled horn toad.
And hes mentioned it repeatedly.
You see the media simply doesnt report it.
Bit out of my element here, as I said I don't live there, but how does local communities who are near transit lines, and from I recall, neither of those lines are extensive, bar people from building near them? And from what I see, and consequently know, regarding those houses in the fire hazard ares, the don't seem exactly the transit type of people, you don't build on the edge of a mountain nor in an area surrounded by forest if you are strap holder
Probably did, but why is it important, the fire didn't start yesterday, for a month Trump ignored it, and now, facing criticism, he is going if your report is true, as I said, you can bet your ass if it was an equivalent hurricane hitting Florida or a rash of tornadoes striking Iowa, Trump would be all over it tossing out paper towels and touring with Melania in her high heels
"but it take a lot of heat to get green wood to burn," even if that green wood has been dried out from decades of accelerated increased heat?
Calif, actually nearly the whole west coast is general, is a whole lot bigger than WV and Kentucky combined, I'd have to say the task would be herculean
And again you are missing the bottom line, a President doesn't blame people experiencing a disaster rather attempts to draw attention and offer empathy towards their struggles and loss
Just stop lol.
Trees that ‘are dried out from decades of climate change’ are *dead*. For whatever reasons, CA sucks at forest management. If someone wants to build a subdivision on a wooded hill in CA—please have someone do a controlled burn in the area first.
It will save considerable grief down the road.
An expert on contagions AND forest fires.
Awesome.
"At the moment, President Donald Trump is attempting to manage the revelation that he intentionally downplayed the COVID-19 pandemic, which has now killed upward of 191,000 Americans. That effort has apparently left little room on his mental plate for the dozens of fires currently ravaging California, Oregon, and Washington."
"While the president signed a disaster declaration for California back in August, he has yet to do so for Oregon, which is in the throes of a catastrophe. The last time he dispatched a tweet about wildfires was on August 6."
"Concentrating on an environmental crisis in the West isn’t politically expedient for a president preoccupied with reelection and little else. “The Electoral College allows—indeed, encourages—Trump to ignore California’s wildfire crisis because he knows he cannot win the state,” he wrote. “He doesn’t even pretend to govern the entire country, just red states and swing states. Those suffering in blue states mean nothing to him.”
https://www.lamag.com/citythinkblog/trump-wildfires/
Trump loves to tweet on the slightest of events happening in Portland, but here we have a natural disaster hitting the State of Oregon and crickets. The last time he reacted, in August, he blamed California for their own difficulties
I thought President's represented all Americans, that they were expected to address catastrophes when they effected Americans no matter where they occurred, at the very least show some degree of empathy.
You can bet your ass if it was an equivalent hurricane hitting Florida or a rash of tornadoes striking Iowa, Trump would be all over it tossing out paper towels and touring with Melania in her high heels
He is going to California to examine the damage next week you dipshit. She changed her heels to sneakers while in Airforce One you moron."At the moment, President Donald Trump is attempting to manage the revelation that he intentionally downplayed the COVID-19 pandemic, which has now killed upward of 191,000 Americans. That effort has apparently left little room on his mental plate for the dozens of fires currently ravaging California, Oregon, and Washington."
"While the president signed a disaster declaration for California back in August, he has yet to do so for Oregon, which is in the throes of a catastrophe. The last time he dispatched a tweet about wildfires was on August 6."
"Concentrating on an environmental crisis in the West isn’t politically expedient for a president preoccupied with reelection and little else. “The Electoral College allows—indeed, encourages—Trump to ignore California’s wildfire crisis because he knows he cannot win the state,” he wrote. “He doesn’t even pretend to govern the entire country, just red states and swing states. Those suffering in blue states mean nothing to him.”
https://www.lamag.com/citythinkblog/trump-wildfires/
Trump loves to tweet on the slightest of events happening in Portland, but here we have a natural disaster hitting the State of Oregon and crickets. The last time he reacted, in August, he blamed California for their own difficulties
I thought President's represented all Americans, that they were expected to address catastrophes when they effected Americans no matter where they occurred, at the very least show some degree of empathy.
You can bet your ass if it was an equivalent hurricane hitting Florida or a rash of tornadoes striking Iowa, Trump would be all over it tossing out paper towels and touring with Melania in her high heels
