There was a school shooting but you’d hardly know it

StoneByStone said:
That's fine, don't kill people. But you have no right to prevent others from killing people.
Click to expand...

I haven't shot anyone since Vietnam. So I'm in compliance sport. Seeing that murder is illegal I have every right to prevent it if I can. Is the too deep for you?
 
cawacko said:
One good thing about fighting is even if you get your butt kicked (assuming your aren't seriously injured) you wake up the next day and life goes on. Today people are so much more likely to get a gun to deal with issues rather than fight. I don't see that as guns being more prevalent but something in the mindset of people has changed.
Click to expand...

Morality?
 
StoneByStone said:
No freedom of speech would mean more deaths because it would lead to a totalitarian state. No freedom of religion would mean more deaths because it would lead to a theocracy. Less guns would not cause a radical change like that. If anything it would lead to a safer society.
Part of having a free society is knowing which rights not to let people have.
Click to expand...
The founders did a pretty good job of that. Feel free to start the process of amending the Constitution. Or move somewhere else, that doesn't have the right to bear arms. No one's stopping you.
 
p3tE0j9.jpg
 
Sirthinksalot said:
The founders did a pretty good job of that. Feel free to start the process of amending the Constitution. Or move somewhere else, that doesn't have the right to bear arms. No one's stopping you.
Click to expand...

Do you really care what the Founders thought? People seem to pick and choose when it comes to the Founders.

I rather try to make America better. No country is perfect, so it doesn't make much sense to leave because of one thing.
 
Grumpy said:
Ok I'll play you silly asinine game. A homeless guy needs a place to live shouldn't he have the right to move into your home?
Click to expand...

No, because there is a better alternative to that. We have enough empty houses, as well as homeless shelters, to solve homelessness. So we can actually end homelessness without forcing people to allow strangers into their homes.
 
leaningright said:
Because the only thing that can be done is to change the way of life of millions of other folks. What can be done would make shooting sports (targets, sheet, trap, etc) available only to the affluent. What can be done would be to change our society to the likeness of those we sought to escape almost 250 years ago. I am quite thankful for those politicians who realize that and don’t make knee-jerk laws limiting the freedoms of citizens seeking to follow the law.
Click to expand...

Tell that to the 90's. You all lived fine under the restrictions, but now have become paranoid from the NRA propaganda. What idiot listens to a fundie source like that, over the facts of the past? It's become the go to excuse, of the bogus slippery slope. Well it never happened, and never will. You can't even pass the sane choice things, the majority of America wants, because of the bogus slippery slope. Doing anything but lessening restrictions is tyranny in this bogus scenario. I learned a while back, that what if, and projected consequences, is a tool of the devil. It's what drove my madness. You people are insane to take that from fundie groups, and politicians. No one is trying to take guns away. They are trying to stop the sale, of what should never had been available for civilian life, and should have remained banned. Many gun enthusiasts want this just the same. You fear tyranny on the right, but create it for others.
 
Last edited:
StoneByStone said:
No, because there is a better alternative to that. We have enough empty houses, as well as homeless shelters, to solve homelessness. So we can actually end homelessness without forcing people to allow strangers into their homes.
Click to expand...

Funny how it's different when it involves you. So let me use your moronic murder. Someone wants to murder you and rape your wife shouldn't they have the right? If you say no you will have negated your entire premise.
 
Grumpy said:
Funny how it's different when it involves you. So let me use your moronic murder. Someone wants to murder you and rape your wife shouldn't they have the right? If you say no you will have negated your entire premise.
Click to expand...

You're misunderstanding. It's not about it involving me. I don't think ANYONE should be forced to let someone into their home.

No, I don't think murder and rape should be legal. How does that negate my premise?
 
StoneByStone said:
You're misunderstanding. It's not about it involving me. I don't think ANYONE should be forced to let someone into their home.

No, I don't think murder and rape should be legal. How does that negate my premise?
Click to expand...

Simple you made the moronic statement.
But some people want to murder. Should they not have that right?
Click to expand...
That sure sounds like ypu think murder should be legal.


I really shouldn't make a mentally challenged such as yourself look like a drooling imbecil.
 
Republicans love school shootings. It's an action sequel to them. "Little helpless babies shot up by Emo gun fool, this time it's personal":corn:
 
Micawber said:
Republicans love school shootings. It's an action sequel to them. "Little helpless babies shot up by Emo gun fool, this time it's personal":corn:
Click to expand...

How come you lefties always try to use school shootings for political purposes? Seems like you are the school shooting loving party.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top