To me, the juciest part of the burger yet!

[Oracle Of JPP 714]

Still nothing?

That's how he rolls. He'll wear you down by doing nothing.

 

[Legion]

Nope. Not President at the time. Just taking monies from Russians for political access through his wife after he was. No big deal there huh?

Not as long as the persons involved are DEMOCRATS. Everything they do & say is A-OK with Brad, seemingly,.

 

[Jarod]

Nope. Not President at the time. Just taking monies from Russians for political access through his wife after he was. No big deal there huh?

Not equivalent to what it appears Rump is doing.

 

[Jarod]

Not as long as the persons involved are DEMOCRATS. Everything they do & say is A-OK with Brad, seemingly,.

So now, In your mind, if Bill Clinton did something AFTER he was out of office, it’s okay for Rump to do something criminal while in office.

Is it criminal for ex-presidents to give speeches for money?

 

[Jarod]

1) But… But… Clinton!

2) There is a reason sitting presidents are not allowed to accept fees for speaking engagements. Are you saying Bill Clinton excepted a fee while he was president?

3) Did you know that the Clinton foundation is a charity? Are you saying that Michael Cohen is a charity?

4) Are you saying that Bill Clinton is the gold standard for presidential ethics?

Nobody can respond! Love it!

 

[christiefan915]

Yeah, sorry, I got my Clinton affiliated Russian oligarchs mixed up. It was Victor Pinchuk. Pinchuk is actually Ukranian, but they all look alike to me.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/emails-show-clinton-denied-then-met-with-ukrainian-donor

Fair enough.

 

[Legion]

Not equivalent to what it appears Rump is doing.

So you say, Brad. LOL @ "appears".

 

[Legion]

So now, In your mind, if Bill Clinton did something AFTER he was out of office, it’s okay for Rump to do something criminal while in office. Is it criminal for ex-presidents to give speeches for money?

I don't recall saying that "if Bill Clinton did something AFTER he was out of office, it’s okay for Trump to do something criminal while in office or that it's criminal for ex-presidents to give speeches for money", Brad.

Can you show me a quote of mine containing those illogical statements?

 

[Jarod]

I don't recall saying that "if Bill Clinton did something AFTER he was out of office, it’s okay for Trump to do something criminal while in office or that it's criminal for ex-presidents to give speeches for money", Brad.

Can you show me a quote of mine containing those illogical statements?

That’s your argument and reason for failing to call Rump out!

 

[Jarod]

1) But… But… Clinton!

2) There is a reason sitting presidents are not allowed to accept fees for speaking engagements. Are you saying Bill Clinton excepted a fee while he was president?

3) Did you know that the Clinton foundation is a charity? Are you saying that Michael Cohen is a charity?

4) Are you saying that Bill Clinton is the gold standard for presidential ethics?

Nothin?

 

[Legion]

That’s your argument and reason for failing to call Rump out!

It is, Brad?

Cite.

 

[Jarod]

1) But… But… Clinton!

2) There is a reason sitting presidents are not allowed to accept fees for speaking engagements. Are you saying Bill Clinton excepted a fee while he was president?

3) Did you know that the Clinton foundation is a charity? Are you saying that Michael Cohen is a charity?

4) Are you saying that Bill Clinton is the gold standard for presidential ethics?

Tough ain’t it!

 

[hvilleherb]

Nothin?

Nothing burger.

 

[Jarod]

Name a believable legal reason a Russian Oligarch would give Cohen half a million dollars.

 

[Legion]

Name a believable legal reason a Russian Oligarch would give Cohen half a million dollars.

Why? Is Cohen accountable to you?

Didn't you two have a mild confrontation once?

 

[Jarod]

Why? Is Cohen accountable to you?

Didn't you two have a mild confrontation once?

So you got nothing?

 

[Legion]

So you got nothing?

Witness will answer the questions.

 

[Jarod]

Witness will answer the questions.

Relevance?

 

[Legion]

Relevance?

The Court wishes to know what standing witness has to demand what appears to be interrogatory information from Mr. Cohen.

The Court also must establish the nature of the relationship between witness and Mr. Cohen to determine whether testimony is prejudicial to Mr. Cohen.

Relevance has been established.

Witness is instructed to answer the questions.

 

[hvilleherb]

Name a believable legal reason a Russian Oligarch would give Cohen half a million dollars.

There's no law against giving your money away.