Top 10 media lies about President Trump (thus far)

signalmankenneth said:
(CNN)In his first 869 days as President, Donald Trump said 10,796 things that were either misleading or outright false, according to The Washington Post's Fact Checker. Do the math and you get this: The President of the United States is saying 12 untrue things a day.

Which is a lot! But it's also hard to wrap your head around how much lying or, uh, misleading that actually is. So, think about it this way: Trump is lying more every day than a majority of Americans wash their hands. According to data from the American Cleaning Institute, just 50% of Americans wash their hands in excess of 10 times a day. (Not for nothing: Here's the CDC's guidelines on proper handwashing!)

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/10/politics/donald-trump-lies-fact-check/index.html
DjrBZI4W0AAhSgZ.jpg
Click to expand...

Translation: Change the subject to smearing President Trump as a liar (based on the word of hilariously discredited partisan hacks and pathological liars who were just proved to be lying about him), as if that has anything to do with whether or not the examples provided of the media's pathological lying about him are valid. This is the very definition of a "whataboutism" fallacy.

:laugh:
 
Arminius said:
Escalating the diversionary smear tactics won't refute anything either. It's still an invalid fallacy aimed at avoiding the debate through off-topic personal insults. For approximately the billionth time, thanks for demonstrating that no liberal can pass the ad hominem IQ test. :laugh:
Click to expand...

^Evmetro
 
StoneByStone said:
But what do you consider to be a lie? Anything about Saint Trump that you don't like, correct?
Click to expand...

Rewording your incredibly stupid fallacy doesn't make it less invalid. :dunno:

You're literally just arbitrarily assigning your opponent the label of believing any criticism of Trump must be a lie, based on nothing, instead of refuting anything presented (the signature of a shitty, incompetent debater). :bs:
 
christiefan915 said:
:rofl2: He paid millions to keep his Columbia records sealed? That's on a par with "Frank Marshall Davis" is Obama's father. All blatant RWNJ lies.

Btw where did Obama get these millions to get the records sealed, and who did he give them to?
:
Click to expand...

The LA Times and CBS News are now right-wing? Nice logic there, uninformed DNC parrot. :rofl2:

View attachment 11480

Here is the LA Times admitting how many people were fighting to get the records unsealed (how can there be a fight to unseal something that isn't sealed?).

Here is CBS News confirming that Obama spent $36 million to keep his records sealed.

View attachment 11481
 
Irish said:
The media has lost all credibility. If Trump is credited with anything, it will be how he was able to expose the media.
Click to expand...

That's his single biggest accomplishment. Removing all doubt that our utterly biased and corrupt media is 100% rooting for one side by making it lose its mind and try to crucify him at every turn. :laugh:

View attachment 11482
 
Arminius said:
The LA Times and CBS News are now right-wing? Nice logic there, uninformed DNC parrot. :rofl2:

View attachment 11480

Here is the LA Times admitting how many people were fighting to get the records unsealed (how can there be a fight to unseal something that isn't sealed?).

Here is CBS News confirming that Obama spent $36 million to keep his records sealed.

View attachment 11481
Click to expand...

Beyond AM radio is there even such a thing as ‘right wing media’ lol?

Fox gets the label mostly because of one person—Sean Hannity. Even Tucker Carlson is fairly even handed. I’ve seen O’Reilly defend Obama before was gotten rid of by Me2. Sheppard Smith is a full-blown TDS lefty. With the exception of Hannity, Fox covers Trump *fairly*.

And THAT is why Fox is ‘right wing’ only in the sense it’s not 24/7 Trump bashing.

But yeah, Trump has thoroughly exposed the media as 90% partisan hacks. It’s fair to call the bulk of the media as the DNC’s propaganda arm.

And that is not hyperbole.
 
Darth Omar said:
Beyond AM radio is there even such a thing as ‘right wing media’ lol?

Fox gets the label mostly because of one person—Sean Hannity. Even Tucker Carlson is fairly even handed. I’ve seen O’Reilly defend Obama before was gotten rid of by Me2. Sheppard Smith is a full-blown TDS lefty. With the exception of Hannity, Fox covers Trump *fairly*.

And THAT is why Fox is ‘right wing’ only in the sense it’s not 24/7 Trump bashing.

But yeah, Trump has thoroughly exposed the media as 90% partisan hacks. It’s fair to call the bulk of the media as the DNC’s propaganda arm.

And that is not hyperbole.
Click to expand...

Including multiple sides of the story = "right-wing." That's always been the criteria by these ridiculous imbeciles.
 
Arminius said:
I rest my case. Again, every single Democrat "counterpoint" is one of two invalid ad hominem fallacies: Either "You're mean" or "You're stupid." They are intellectually incapable of literally nothing more than name-calling.

:laugh:

Thanks for demonstrating (yet again). :hand:
Click to expand...


You forgot about sleazy scum bag, uneducated, racist, knuckle dragger and moron. You just cant get anything right
 
Including mutiple sides to the story?

It's more like allowing a flatulent KKK member to sit with you at dinner. Just how much reprehensible uncouth evil must people of good nature put up with for the sake of including deplorables?

Good people can't listen to a Republiklans for more than 2 minutes without saying "yuck" or "eww" Sorry, just have your own dinner party at Fox News
and keep the hell away from the rest of us. We're trying to eat. You're disgusting.
 
Arminius said:
The LA Times and CBS News are now right-wing? Nice logic there, uninformed DNC parrot. :rofl2:

View attachment 11480

Here is the LA Times admitting how many people were fighting to get the records unsealed (how can there be a fight to unseal something that isn't sealed?).

Here is CBS News confirming that Obama spent $36 million to keep his records sealed.

View attachment 11481
Click to expand...

Did I miss the part in the CBS article where his Columbia records were mentioned? I didn't know school transcripts were controlled by the Feds.

And ICYMI the Times article claimed this was an April Fool's joke.

I have to teach you hacks everything, it's boring. Please work on improving your research skills.
 
Arminius said:
Rewording your incredibly stupid fallacy doesn't make it less invalid. :dunno:

You're literally just arbitrarily assigning your opponent the label of believing any criticism of Trump must be a lie, based on nothing, instead of refuting anything presented (the signature of a shitty, incompetent debater). :bs:
Click to expand...

Look, we both know the Russian collusion wasn't a "media lie." I'm not going to bother to have an honest debate with someone who isn't being honest. I rather troll the trolls.
I will grant you that the media does lie about Trump. He never said all Mexicans are rapists. But most of the things on this list aren't lies.
 
Micawber said:
Including mutiple sides to the story?

It's more like allowing a flatulent KKK member to sit with you at dinner.
Click to expand...

Say the openly racist Democrat nutjobs committing daily political violence in every corner of the country. And no, further smearing anyone to the right of Karl Marx as "right-wing" DOESN'T legitimize your absurd fascist position that allowing multiple sides of the story makes you right-wing. It just further demonstrates how intellectually inferior you are to the rest of society.

Micawber said:
Good people can't listen to a Republiklans for more than 2 minutes without saying "yuck" or "eww" Sorry, just have your own dinner party at Fox News
and keep the hell away from the rest of us. We're trying to eat. You're disgusting.
Click to expand...

And combining Kindergarten smears with self-righteous delusions won't rescue your garbage argument here either. Try again. :laugh:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top