TRUMP HAS AN ACE UP HIS SLEEVE - THE "JEFFERSON CARD"

Cypress said:
Cossacks are not just found in Ukraine.
Cossacks are a diffuse confederation of Slavic peoples found throughout the Eurasian steppes of eastern Ukraine, southern Russia, Caucasus, Kazakhstan.

Have you actually ever been to Ukraine or Russia?
Have you ever actually taken a college level class in Slavic studies, or read any of the classic Ukrainian and Russian literature?

It literally takes years of specialized university training to become an expert on the cultural, religious, and political history of the lands of the former imperial Russian Empire. I claim no scholarly expertise, but know enough to realize that ethnic caricature is the province of the uniformed and willfully bigoted.
Click to expand...

I'm fairly well versed in the Slavic peoples.

Did you ever hear of Nestor Chronicler?

He stated Russian ethnography was largely Finnic & Baltic.

Although I think a lot of Russia has assimilated real true Slavic Poles & Ruthenians.

After all The Vladimir Suzdal & Dutchy of Moscow mark the forebears of Russia.
Truth maybe that 90% of Russia is not even Really Russian ethnicity.
 
Cypress said:
Cossacks are not just found in Ukraine.
Cossacks are a diffuse confederation of Slavic peoples found throughout the Eurasian steppes of eastern Ukraine, southern Russia, Caucasus, Kazakhstan.

Have you actually ever been to Ukraine or Russia?
Have you ever actually taken a college level class in Slavic studies, or read any of the classic Ukrainian and Russian literature?

It literally takes years of specialized university training to become an expert on the cultural, religious, and political history of the lands of the former imperial Russian Empire. I claim no scholarly expertise, but know enough to realize that ethnic caricature is the province of the uniformed and willfully bigoted.
Click to expand...

By the way.
Did you ever consider the real split & division between West & East Ukraine is a ethnicity rivalry?

East Ukraine was not Kievan Rus, if it was they just had minor settlements against Turkic tribes like Khazars or Cumans.


Truth West Ukraine is Slavic it was Kievsn Rus,it was Lendians, Poles & Ukraine.

Truth is Cossacks were first likely Turkic but were joined by Slavic peoples later especially Ruthenians.
 
Cypress said:
You spend way too much time on stereotypes and caricatures. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with Germans, Lithuanians, Russians, Ukrainians.

Germany and Russia may have given us Hitler, Goebbels, Stalin, Beria. But they also gave us Mozart, Von Goethe, Schindler, Tolstoy, Solzhenitsyn, Tchaikovsky.
Click to expand...

What makes you think Stereotypes never have basis?

Take you, Dutch Uncle , Text Drivers & Myself.

All 4 are Americans.

Yet, we are all different.

Dutch is an Individualist of the Left.
Text is an Individualist of the Right.
You are a Collectivist of the Left.
I'm a Collectivist of t he Right.

Ever consider that's ETHNICITY INSPIRED?

East Euros are more Collectivist.

Why are we STILL more Collectivist in America?

How is that culture?
Speaking on my own behalf I think I just think & feel differently than Americans overall.
It has NOTHING TO DO WITH CULTURE.

My Polish family came from South East Poland between Lwow & Krakow.

If you didn't know we're the most Conservative ,& Collectivist of the Poles.


PiS of Law & Justice is the Collectivist Right & id extremely popular in South East Poland.

Although North West Poland not do much.

Although North West Poland has Some Swedish like genetics mixed in.
Probably due to Swedish Pomerania?

Maybe South East Poland is 80% Polish & 20% Ukrainians.
Maybe North West Poland is 80% Polish & 20% Swedish.

Maybe those differences changed how they think & feel?

I think it's especially prominent in Italy.

Have you seen How Italy votes lately?

3 zones the North the South & Central.

A lot of Italians don't like each other.

My ex gf was Northern Italian & told her when her ex was Sicilian why you dating a Sicilian Neggrow for.
Did you know North Italy scores a 101 to 103 IQ. But Southern Italy just 89?

How can that be just culture?

I thought Italian was minimally differences?

Yet, it appears they think & feel differently dur to ethnicity.

The genes aren't uniform in Italy.

S Italy is more like Greeks , North more like Swiss.
 
RomanDmowski said:
By the way.
Did you ever consider the real split & division between West & East Ukraine is a ethnicity rivalry?

East Ukraine was not Kievan Rus, if it was they just had minor settlements against Turkic tribes like Khazars or Cumans.


Truth West Ukraine is Slavic it was Kievsn Rus,it was Lendians, Poles & Ukraine.

Truth is Cossacks were first likely Turkic but were joined by Slavic peoples later especially Ruthenians.
Click to expand...
The truth is, ethnic distinctions are artificial human constructs.
The only tangible distinctions are linguistic.

At the time of Kievan Rus there was no such things as the Russian or Ukrainian languages - those languages, and their associated socio-ethnic distinctions did not develop until about 500 years ago.

The origin of the Cossack peoples is hardly well understood. It remains unsubstantiated, even to trained historical scholars.

I put to the test the hypothesis that Cossacks originate from Turkic tribes.

Since my grandmother was from an old, long-standing Cossack family of the Lower Don Host, I was curious what my DNA showed.

I have no detectable Turkic or Central Asian DNA. Zero percent. My DNA is overwhelmingly East Slavic, with subordinate and secondary Baltic (probably Lithuanian).

No evidence of Turkic in my grandmother's Cossack DNA lineage. Cossacks are unequivocally an East Slavic peoples.

The Tartars are obviously of Turkic origin, and that is who you must be thinking of.
 
Cypress said:
The truth is, ethnic distinctions are artificial human constructs.
The only tangible distinctions are linguistic.

At the time of Kievan Rus there was no such things as the Russian or Ukrainian languages - those languages, and their associated socio-ethnic distinctions did not develop until about 500 years ago.

The origin of the Cossack peoples is hardly well understood. It remains unsubstantiated, even to trained historical scholars.

I put to the test the hypothesis that Cossacks originate from Turkic tribes.

Since my grandmother was from an old, long-standing Cossack family of the Lower Don Host, I was curious what my DNA showed.

I have no detectable Turkic or Central Asian DNA. Zero percent. My DNA is overwhelmingly East Slavic, with subordinate and secondary Baltic (probably Lithuanian).

No evidence of Turkic in my grandmother's Cossack DNA lineage. Cossacks are unequivocally an East Slavic peoples.

The Tartars are obviously of Turkic origin, and that is who you must be thinking of.
Click to expand...

Some Tatars are nearly identical to Rostov Scythians by DNA.

We aren't talking about Kazakhstan or Uighur or Uzbek Turkic tribes.

Those are basically true Turks.

We're also not talking about Ottoman Turks who are more like Armenia, Azerbaijan, Greeks. Caucasus, Kurt's etc by genes.

We are talking about a fairly White looking people.

Tatar genes & phenotype is only slightly more Eastern.

Tatar look more like Ukrainians & Russian than Kazakhstan peoples.
 
Cypress said:
The truth is, ethnic distinctions are artificial human constructs.
The only tangible distinctions are linguistic.

At the time of Kievan Rus there was no such things as the Russian or Ukrainian languages - those languages, and their associated socio-ethnic distinctions did not develop until about 500 years ago.

The origin of the Cossack peoples is hardly well understood. It remains unsubstantiated, even to trained historical scholars.

I put to the test the hypothesis that Cossacks originate from Turkic tribes.

Since my grandmother was from an old, long-standing Cossack family of the Lower Don Host, I was curious what my DNA showed.

I have no detectable Turkic or Central Asian DNA. Zero percent. My DNA is overwhelmingly East Slavic, with subordinate and secondary Baltic (probably Lithuanian).

No evidence of Turkic in my grandmother's Cossack DNA lineage. Cossacks are unequivocally an East Slavic peoples.

The Tartars are obviously of Turkic origin, and that is who you must be thinking of.
Click to expand...

Is Ruslan Chagaev the TATAR boxer a typical Tatar?

I tend to think so.

If so.

Explain why Polish boxer Dariusz Michalczewski & East German boxer Max Smelling looked similar?

Not saying that's a typical Polish or German look still though.
 
RomanDmowski said:
Is Ruslan Chagaev the TATAR boxer a typical Tatar?

I tend to think so.

If so.

Explain why Polish boxer Dariusz Michalczewski & East German boxer Max Smelling looked similar?

Not saying that's a typical Polish or German look still though.
Click to expand...

I generally only compose responses to serious posts, or posts which are genuinely clever, or funny.
 
Cypress said:
The truth is, ethnic distinctions are artificial human constructs.
The only tangible distinctions are linguistic.

At the time of Kievan Rus there was no such things as the Russian or Ukrainian languages - those languages, and their associated socio-ethnic distinctions did not develop until about 500 years ago.

The origin of the Cossack peoples is hardly well understood. It remains unsubstantiated, even to trained historical scholars.

I put to the test the hypothesis that Cossacks originate from Turkic tribes.

Since my grandmother was from an old, long-standing Cossack family of the Lower Don Host, I was curious what my DNA showed.

I have no detectable Turkic or Central Asian DNA. Zero percent. My DNA is overwhelmingly East Slavic, with subordinate and secondary Baltic (probably Lithuanian).

No evidence of Turkic in my grandmother's Cossack DNA lineage. Cossacks are unequivocally an East Slavic peoples.

The Tartars are obviously of Turkic origin, and that is who you must be thinking of.
Click to expand...

BTW.
I've been told I look somewhat like Dariusz Michalczewski & Wladimir Klitscko.

Although I'd throw in some Pawrl Delag & Rafal Borsyiuk.

It's undeniable that Look Eastern European.

Yet
MOST Americans think I look Italian or German.
 
Cypress said:
I generally only compose responses to serious posts, or posts which are genuinely clever, or funny.
Click to expand...

I'm serious.

Honestly I think Dariusz Michalczewski looks more Tatar than Ruslan Chagaev.

Maybe Dariusz is of s Lipks Tatar background & might not even know it.
 
RomanDmowski said:
I'm serious.

Honestly I think Dariusz Michalczewski looks more Tatar than Ruslan Chagaev.

Maybe Dariusz is of s Lipks Tatar background & might not even know it.
Click to expand...

Okay, so you have run out off anything remotely sensible to write and are down to being a troll
 
Cypress said:
Okay, so you have run out off anything remotely sensible to write and are down to being a troll
Click to expand...

I've never met a Tatar personally but I've seen pics.

They look like Ruslan Chagaev,Charles Bronson, Dariusz Michalczewski, heck some maybe look like Putin.

Do you deny that there's Blonde Tatars?
 
Dachshund said:
At that moment the Presidency will be in his hands.


And there is nothing stopping Pence under the (PLENARY and UNAPPEALABLE) authority vested in him as President of the Senate, fromdeclining to open and count the certificates from the six (6) disputed states.


Pence, as I say has an ABSOLUTE, "plenary and unappealable" authority to do this, should he so decide.
Click to expand...

Complete BS. If Pence has any more authority than to just open and count the votes Ghomert wouldn't need a lawsuit to strike down the Electoral Vote Act that outlines the procedures the VP must follow.
 
Cypress said:
Okay, so you have run out off anything remotely sensible to write and are down to being a troll
Click to expand...

Here's a DNA chart.

https://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2016/07/sneak-peek-basal-eurasian-k7.html

Ughurs are close to 44% to 50% East Eurasian DNA.

Lipka Tatars are about 20% to 22% East Eurasian by DNA.

Tatars from Kryashen are about 12% to 13% East Eurasian.

Cossacks are about 0.2% to 3.5% East Eurasian.

Poles are about 0.0 to 0.6% East Eurasian.

While Cossacks might be more like Poles.
It seems some might be more than a bit Tatar.

Depending how you look at it.

If you compare Kryasten Tatars then the highest Cossacks from Kuban in East Eurasian DNA almost falls about 35% Tatar & 65% Pole goinf bt the lowest East Eurasian Kryastan Tatar.

However on average it looks like Kuban Cossacks are maybe 10- 15% Tatar & maybe Ukraine Cossacks are maybe 5% Tatar.

Not saying you aren't majority Slavic.

Actually it looks like Russians are more like Finns & Estonians here than like Poles.

While Cossacks are still mostly like Poles.
 
[FONT=&quot]Putting everything else aside, how profoundly stupid do you have to be to believe that the founders intended for the vice president to be able to select the next president regardless of official election results? Why is former Vice President John Nance Garner’s verdict that the job isn’t worth a “bucket of warm spit” (or in some versions, a more noxious form of bodily effluvia) the only thing for which anyone remembers Garner?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]According to this theory, then-Vice President Dick Cheney could have rejected Barack Obama’s electors and installed John McCain as president in early 2009. Heck, Al Gore, who was vice president in 2000, could have rejected George W. Bush’s Florida electoral votes and named himself president. According to Gohmert & Co. this would have been perfectly legal and constitutional.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I should note that if you take this idea seriously, not only would the vice president be massively more powerful than anybody ever thought, but the very idea of federal elections and federalism itself would be rendered null and void. A single highly partisan politician could simply override the will of the states, and the electorate generally, and pick the winner. Why not just have the debates in the vice president’s living room from now on?


Jonah Goldberg[/FONT]
 
Micawber said:
[FONT="]Putting everything else aside, how profoundly stupid do you have to be to believe that the founders intended for the vice president to be able to select the next president regardless of official election results? Why is former Vice President John Nance Garner’s verdict that the job isn’t worth a “bucket of warm spit” (or in some versions, a more noxious form of bodily effluvia) the only thing for which anyone remembers Garner?[/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]According to this theory, then-Vice President Dick Cheney could have rejected Barack Obama’s electors and installed John McCain as president in early 2009. Heck, Al Gore, who was vice president in 2000, could have rejected George W. Bush’s Florida electoral votes and named himself president. According to Gohmert & Co. this would have been perfectly legal and constitutional.[/FONT]
[FONT="]I should note that if you take this idea seriously, not only would the vice president be massively more powerful than anybody ever thought, but the very idea of federal elections and federalism itself would be rendered null and void. A single highly partisan politician could simply override the will of the states, and the electorate generally, and pick the winner. Why not just have the debates in the vice president’s living room from now on?


Jonah Goldberg[/FONT]
Click to expand...

it's just that ability to set aside specious election results. get your panties ungunched.
 
Congress has no power to do anything to change the state elections. None.

God bless President Biden, the legitimate president. The last legitimate one was the great Barack Obama.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top