Alleged crimes.
Crimes are crimes, that they were violated is alleged
Alleged crimes.
Crimes are crimes, that they were violated is alleged
Did you know the sky is blue and that water is wet?
Trump walks
Judge denies Trump legal team’s motion to extend deadline over protective order dispute in election subversion case
... A federal judge on Saturday denied a request from former President Donald Trump’s legal team for a deadline extension over the handling of evidence in the 2020 election subversion case.
Trump’s lawyers will have to respond by Monday afternoon to the Justice Department’s proposal for a protective order.
The decision from US District Judge Tanya Chutkan caps a flurry of activity in the case after special counsel Jack Smith’s team on Friday asked Chutkan to quickly set limits on what Trump’s team can do with the evidence that will be shared with them....
...After Chutkan on Saturday ordered Trump’s legal team to state its position on the motion by 5 p.m. ET Monday, lawyers for Trump requested more time to weigh in on what restrictions should be imposed. Trump’s lawyers asked to have until Thursday to respond, and suggested a hearing on the matter might be necessary if an agreement with prosecutors isn’t reached.
Smith’s team, however, urged Chutkan to stick to her original Monday deadline, arguing in a Saturday afternoon filing that the request from Trump’s legal team amounted to an “unnecessary delay.”
Prosecutors said they were ready to work quickly to produce discovery in the case, a key step in jump-starting the proceedings, but, they wrote, the defendant is “standing in the way.”...
Trump election trial: Special counsel Jack Smith seeks Jan. 2 start date
- Special counsel Jack Smith proposed a Jan. 2 start date for former President Donald Trump’s trial on charges of attempting to overturn his loss in the 2020 presidential election.
- Smith in a court filing in Washington, D.C., federal court argued that that trial date would “vindicate the public’s strong interest in a speedy trial.”
- The proposed timeline would start the D.C. trial more than five months before jury selection begins in Trump’s other federal case centered on his handling of classified documents.
I thought I heard the prosecution is asking for like January 3 2023
This is not Aileen Cannon licking Trumps boots while defying the law and telling him he is special. before her Superior Court tore her a new one.
These are the POWERFUL DOMINANT WOMEN who have brought Trump to heel.
Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya laid down very tough pre trial conditions for Trump to follow and that he is likely to fail.
![]()
![]()
I invite you all to meet Judge who will run the case against Trump in the next stage.
PUT SOME RESPECT ON HERE NAME!
![]()
She has given the toughest sentences so far of any judge on 36 Jan6th defendants matching or exceeding Prosecutors request for sentences. Meet Judge Tanya S. Chutkan.
She has ruled against Trump prior on his request to block documents going to the Jan6th committee with a headline statement Judgement Chutkan wrote, “Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President. And Chutkan has said prison can be a powerful deterrent against the threat of another insurrection.”
Federal judge warns Trump’s right to free speech "not absolute"
The federal judge overseeing the case involving former President Trump's alleged efforts to subvert 2020 election results agreed Friday to the defense's proposal for a more limited scope of the protective order, but argued that Trump's right to free speech is "not absolute," according to multiple reports.
Why it matters: Trump's lawyers have made a First Amendment argument central to their defense in the Jan. 6 case, saying that the former president's actions surrounding the 2020 election were protected political speech.
- "Mr. Trump, like every American, has a First Amendment right to free speech, but that right is not absolute," U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan said during her first hearing over the case.
- "In a criminal case such as this one, the defendant's free speech is subject to the rules."
Driving the news: Chutkan said that she plans to issue a protective order over the handling of evidence in the case, which is the subject of debate between Trump's attorneys and prosecutors.
- Chutkan warned that without a protective order, "a party could release information that could taint the jury pool, intimidate witnesses or others involved in some aspect of the case."
- But Chutkan rejected prosecutors' proposal to shield the "improper dissemination or use" of all evidence to the public that is turned over before the trial.
Zoom out: Chutkan also noted that Trump's presidential campaign will not have bearing on how she handles the case. "I intend to keep politics out of this," she said.
- "If that means he can't say exactly what he wants to say about witnesses in this case, then that's how it's going to be," she added.
- Chutkan offered a stark warning in her closing remarks, saying that the more that one party makes "inflammatory statements" that could intimidate witnesses, the "greater the urgency will be that we proceed to trial quickly."
Trump pleaded not guilty last week to four criminal charges related to his efforts to subvert 2020 election results.
Special counsel Jack Smith on Thursday proposed a start date of Jan. 2, 2024 for the trial, which adds to a packed courtroom schedule in the middle of Trump's presidential campaign.
Judge issues protective order against Trump, cautioning him against 'inflammatory statements'
The judge said the former president's First Amendment rights are "not absolute."
... "Mr. Trump, like any American, has a right to free speech," Chutkan told attorneys at Friday's hearing. "But that right is not absolute."...
..."I intend to ensure the orderly administration of justice in this case as I would with any other case,"...
... "The more a party makes inflammatory statements about this case which could taint the jury pool or intimidate potential witnesses, the greater the urgency will be that we proceed to trial to ensure a jury pool from which we can select an impartial jury."...
... Chutkan ruled that Trump would be restricted from discussing publicly materials deemed "sensitive," which would include all recordings, transcripts, interview reports and related exhibits shared by the special counsel.
The judge said she believed the release of the materials created "too great a risk" that witnesses could be intimidated or the jury pool would be tainted....
... "The existence of a political campaign will not have any bearing on my decision," Chutkan said....
... "He's a criminal defendant -- he's going to have restrictions like every single other defendant," ...
..."He has shown a tendency or desire to hold onto (classified and restricted ) material which he should not have,"...
... Chutkan ultimately ruled that she will allow Trump to review discovery materials without having a member of his legal team sit with him -- however, she said she will order his lawyers to "ensure" that if Trump is reviewing materials alone, he must not have any kind of electronic device or phone that could be used to copy the materials....
Both women. Both PoC. Both come from countries Trump would label shitholes.
The Justice in this is too good to not enjoy.
OTOH, the great injustice is that Abraham Lincoln was assassinated before he could deport all of the Blacks in America.
That would mean that disrespectful, ungrateful, degenerate Blacks like you were not still be a loathsome pox on American society in 2023. A pox that has, since 1865 contributed nothing of value to the republic; but has caused great deal of trouble, and disharmony and cost to the White (European) American tax-payer. Your only interest lies in resentment - in endeavouring to destroy those true, good and beautiful things that have been created by an objectively superior White, Western, American culture.
If I were Trump, when I became POTUS 47 in 2024, my most urgent priorities would be crafting policy to deport individuals like you back to the shit-hole that was their genetic homeland, before you had the opportunity to further degradeAmerican society.
Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND
DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!