Yakuda
Verified User
To retards? Yes
Trump Moves to Strip Tax Exemption From Schools That Aid Minority Students
- Thread starter Hume
- Start date
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
Perhaps, but I can construct a complete sentence that is grammatically correct.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
a little harsh.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
Did you forget to take your meds for your mental illness?????????????
Yakuda
Verified User
You can only expect so much
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
Good for you, and you get a star for that.
Scan this entire thread and explain what the topic is:
The thread is a brand-new forum discussion (started today, ~20 posts so far) of a Treasury/IRS proposed regulation announced September 3, 2026.
The original post by Hume links a New York Times piece titled “Schools Giving Aid to Minority Students Could Lose Tax Exemptions Under Trump’s New Rules.” The thread title copies that framing.
Treasury and the IRS proposed rules that would deny or revoke 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status for private schools (K-12 through universities and trade schools) that adopt, maintain, or enforce policies or practices that discriminate on the basis of race, color, or national/ethnic origin. This covers admissions, scholarships, financial aid, programs, facilities, and similar activities.
The proposal:
Official statements from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent frame it as ending “racial discrimination” that has been rebranded as “equitable,” “inclusive,” or “diversity-enhancing,” consistent with Trump executive orders on merit and ending race-based preferences.
The conversation quickly split from the policy itself:
The thread is still short and argumentative rather than a deep dive into the proposed rule text, legal history (Bob Jones University, post-SFFA affirmative-action cases, etc.), or how many schools actually use explicit racial criteria versus race-neutral proxies. Most of the energy so far is about framing and federalism rather than the details of the regulation.
grok.com
The thread is a brand-new forum discussion (started today, ~20 posts so far) of a Treasury/IRS proposed regulation announced September 3, 2026.
The original post by Hume links a New York Times piece titled “Schools Giving Aid to Minority Students Could Lose Tax Exemptions Under Trump’s New Rules.” The thread title copies that framing.
What the actual policy is
Treasury and the IRS proposed rules that would deny or revoke 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status for private schools (K-12 through universities and trade schools) that adopt, maintain, or enforce policies or practices that discriminate on the basis of race, color, or national/ethnic origin. This covers admissions, scholarships, financial aid, programs, facilities, and similar activities.
The proposal:
- Withdraws older IRS guidance that had allowed certain racial preferences.
- Estimates it could affect as many as ~18,000 private institutions.
- Still permits race-neutral criteria (income, first-generation status, geography, hardship, military family status, academic merit, etc.).
- Continues to allow religious schools to select students based on genuine religious affiliation.
Official statements from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent frame it as ending “racial discrimination” that has been rebranded as “equitable,” “inclusive,” or “diversity-enhancing,” consistent with Trump executive orders on merit and ending race-based preferences.
How the forum thread is treating it
The conversation quickly split from the policy itself:
- Hume posted the NYT article and later restated that the rules target any school with a policy the IRS deems racially discriminatory (admissions and scholarships included).
- Yakuda repeatedly argued the federal government has no constitutional authority over education at all, calling the rest of the debate moot.
- Diogenes pushed back that the constitutional tangent is not the point of this thread, noted Hume’s title tracks the NYT framing rather than the regulation text, and clarified it is an IRS tax-exemption issue, not a Department of Education funding cutoff.
- Other posts include short remarks that “discrimination against whites is wrong” and typical forum sniping (“you are a dope,” demands to answer questions, etc.).
The thread is still short and argumentative rather than a deep dive into the proposed rule text, legal history (Bob Jones University, post-SFFA affirmative-action cases, etc.), or how many schools actually use explicit racial criteria versus race-neutral proxies. Most of the energy so far is about framing and federalism rather than the details of the regulation.
Grok
Grok is an AI assistant built by SpaceXAI. Chat, create images, write code, and get real-time answers from the web and X.
grok.com
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
Is this an example of your grammatically perfect sentence?????????
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
Yakuda
Verified User
Hey look the idiot can emojis. What a fucking geniusThe JPP Forum idiot calling others mentally and intellectually challenged.
I wonder if these people are just pretending to be stupid.The JPP Forum idiot calling others mentally and intellectually challenged.
Yakuda
Verified User
Maybe but you and noking sure arent
I have no idea why you enjoy being a troll. Seems boring.
Have any of you actually read this?
www.nytimes.com
Trump Moves to Strip Tax Exemption From Schools That Aid Minority Students
The Treasury Department released rules that would prevent schools with race-based programs from qualifying for tax-exempt status, a threat to both higher education and other private schools.
www.nytimes.com
Yakuda
Verified User
Tile of the articleScan this entire thread and explain what the topic is:
The thread is a brand-new forum discussion (started today, ~20 posts so far) of a Treasury/IRS proposed regulation announced September 3, 2026.
The original post by Hume links a New York Times piece titled “Schools Giving Aid to Minority Students Could Lose Tax Exemptions Under Trump’s New Rules.” The thread title copies that framing.
What the actual policy is
Treasury and the IRS proposed rules that would deny or revoke 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status for private schools (K-12 through universities and trade schools) that adopt, maintain, or enforce policies or practices that discriminate on the basis of race, color, or national/ethnic origin. This covers admissions, scholarships, financial aid, programs, facilities, and similar activities.
The proposal:
- Withdraws older IRS guidance that had allowed certain racial preferences.
- Estimates it could affect as many as ~18,000 private institutions.
- Still permits race-neutral criteria (income, first-generation status, geography, hardship, military family status, academic merit, etc.).
- Continues to allow religious schools to select students based on genuine religious affiliation.
Official statements from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent frame it as ending “racial discrimination” that has been rebranded as “equitable,” “inclusive,” or “diversity-enhancing,” consistent with Trump executive orders on merit and ending race-based preferences.
How the forum thread is treating it
The conversation quickly split from the policy itself:
- Hume posted the NYT article and later restated that the rules target any school with a policy the IRS deems racially discriminatory (admissions and scholarships included).
- Yakuda repeatedly argued the federal government has no constitutional authority over education at all, calling the rest of the debate moot.
- Diogenes pushed back that the constitutional tangent is not the point of this thread, noted Hume’s title tracks the NYT framing rather than the regulation text, and clarified it is an IRS tax-exemption issue, not a Department of Education funding cutoff.
- Other posts include short remarks that “discrimination against whites is wrong” and typical forum sniping (“you are a dope,” demands to answer questions, etc.).
The thread is still short and argumentative rather than a deep dive into the proposed rule text, legal history (Bob Jones University, post-SFFA affirmative-action cases, etc.), or how many schools actually use explicit racial criteria versus race-neutral proxies. Most of the energy so far is about framing and federalism rather than the details of the regulation.
Grok
Grok is an AI assistant built by SpaceXAI. Chat, create images, write code, and get real-time answers from the web and X.
“Schools Giving Aid to Minority Students Could Lose Tax Exemptions Under Trump’s New Rules.”
Where are they getting this aid and why is the treasury and irs involved?
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
I believe that they were born this way.
Yakuda
Verified User
Because idiots like you make it too much fun
Yakuda seems a bit dim.
Try reading the source in the OP.
Trump Moves to Strip Tax Exemption From Schools That Aid Minority Students
The Treasury Department released rules that would prevent schools with race-based programs from qualifying for tax-exempt status, a threat to both higher education and other private schools.
www.nytimes.com