Trump: Obama committed straight-up treason

Ah, no, the media does report it, just as they do Trump's inane tweets, but those thinking left of center don't need anyone to explain it to them, they think for themselves, haven't you ever noticed, there aren't many big name prime time demogogues on the left preaching to the choir every night and next to zero ranting on the radio everyday

you believe your own lies........terribly sad......
 
Wait a minute, you listed three, that is three, one who isn't even at the station and was never liberal, so now you are done to two, two, and that shows FOX has more "liberal" people than all the other sources have together has conservatives?

Say good night there pal, you are only getting more bizarre by the post, you're done

who are you saying isn't on Fox and was never a lib'rul?.....
 
Wait a minute, you listed three, that is three, one who isn't even at the station and was never liberal, so now you are done to two, two, and that shows FOX has more "liberal" people than all the other sources have together has conservatives?

Say good night there pal, you are only getting more bizarre by the post, you're done

So many lies and fallacies to detangle in one post. Let's begin...

-Notorious Trump-hating homosexual Shepard Smith is loved by liberals and despised by conservatives because he parrots whatever Democrats put out, even when it's been blatantly debunked. "Was never a liberal?" That's provably false. Next lie please.

View attachment 12238

-Shepard Smith JUST left Fox. Him having been a liberal host up until just now...THAT ALONE...still makes Fox more balanced than anyone else...how many conservative hosts on CNN and MSNBC (starting to comprehend why Fox dominates the ratings yet?).

-Citing three easy examples of liberals at Fox News in no way implies that they are the only ones that exist or have existed there. Weak fallacy. Bob Beckel, Evan Bayh, James Carville, Kirsten Powers, Alan Colmes, Tamara Holder, Sally Kohn...just to name a few. The numbers--and the ratings--indicate that Fox is far more fair and balanced, even if that doesn't fit with your worldview. Next.

-And yes, all it takes to demonstrate that Fox is more liberal-friendly than any other network is conservative-friendly is showing three or four liberal members and/or hosts...that is how biased YOUR news media is.

View attachment 12237

Try again.
 
Yes it is. But even better, his accusations match his own crimes. That's why he thinks he's so effective.

Nobody with an IQ over 70 believes any of this

Translation: The hard evidence we have of the Obama administration illegally spying on Trump is all not valid because Democrats cannot comprehend that they are the only ones projecting their crimes onto others and because Democrats call people stupid when they have no actual counterpoint.

Devastating logic there, Socrates. Go lay down and let the adults finish their conversation. :laugh:
 
:rofl2: As usual President Dumb-As-Dirt doesn't have the slightest knowledge of what constitutes treason.

The Constitution states: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”


Note the word “only.” Treason occurs when a U.S. citizen, or a non-citizen on U.S. territory, wages war against the country or provides material support, not just sympathy, to a declared enemy of the United States.

You mean operating on the stunningly ignorant new Democrat standard of calling anything Democrats don't like treasonous and "literally Hitler" is suddenly to be condemned? How convenient. And Obama funded terrorists, shredded the Constitution, rigged elections, aided foreign invasions, and betrayed the republic in unprecedented ways (like weaponizing government against his opponents).

Whether you can comprehend it or not, he was a traitor to this country who belonged at the end of a rope. Sorry if facts don't fit your spoon-fed Democrat talking points. :dunno:
 
You stating distorted facts that can only have originated in a sick mind, is causing me to question whether you're sober or not.

Hurling ad hominem fallacies does not establish your argument. Try again, with an actual counterpoint. Or stay at the kiddie table where intellectually empty nonsense like yours is considered compelling. ;)
 
Damn, I forgot about that. Trump says so many retarded things, it's hard remembering them all.

Like when he talked about all 57 states, Jedi-mind melds, misspelled basic words like "respect," and thought Hawaii was in Asia? Oh wait, that was Obama...the guy whose hilariously stupid non-stop gaffes were always quickly buried by the DNC news media to protect the lie that he wasn't an imbecile.

My personal favorite:

"UPS and FedEx are doing just fine, right? It's the Post Office that's always having problems." –attempting to make the case for government-run healthcare, while simultaneously undercutting his own argument, Portsmouth, N.H., Aug. 11, 2009

:rofl2:
 
Well, Obama may not have personally spied on Trump but someone in his administration did spy on the Trump campaign.

Not much distinction there and facts aren’t debatable. The question of whether it [the spying] was adequately predicated is being looked at—in a criminal investigation.

And that should give every member of The Resistance pause. And it has, since more than a few of them are hiring legal counsel.

James Clapper said that the treasonous coup attempt against the American people was him doing "what we were told to do by the president." Just saying.
 
I bet if a (D) was running who had long-running business and personal ties with one or more of our enemies, YOU would BEG our intel community to "spy" on him/her.

This is an ad hominem fallacy. Try logic that's actually valid.

View attachment 12239

You know, like you sad sacks have done with Hillary for YEARS.

Asking for Hillary "Bleachbit and Hammers" Clinton to be investigated for her stunningly brazen crimes is nothing like Obama weaponizing government to use perjury to illegally spy on Democrat opponents during a major national election.

You are officially too stupid to bother talking to.

View attachment 12240
 
I'm saving this to use, if it's OK;)

Democrats, who falsely accuse others of what only they are doing at every turn, are projecting even THAT deed of theirs onto others, and here we have the dummies rushing in to buy into it.

Absolutely hilarious. :rofl2:
 
Democrats, who falsely accuse others of what only they are doing at every turn, are projecting even THAT deed of theirs onto others, and here we have the dummies rushing in to buy into it.

Absolutely hilarious. :rofl2:
Exactly....It's been that way for quite some time....especially here;) I can't wait to repost that...just surprised Cin confessed...lol
 
James Clapper said that the treasonous coup attempt against the American people was him doing "what we were told to do by the president." Just saying.

I saw that.

It’s hard to believe Obama would ‘not know’ the IC was spying on the Trump campaign but it’s certainly possible some people in the agencies went rogue. Clapper certainly knew but if Obama was in on it he likely surrounded himself with layers of plausible deniability. But Comey was certainly in on it along with a few others.

This is potentially some very serious shyte. Literally a soft coup attempt and it may indeed involve The Obama.

It would explain the rush to impeach Trump ASAP.
 
So many lies and fallacies to detangle in one post. Let's begin...

-Notorious Trump-hating homosexual Shepard Smith is loved by liberals and despised by conservatives because he parrots whatever Democrats put out, even when it's been blatantly debunked. "Was never a liberal?" That's provably false. Next lie please.

View attachment 12238

-Shepard Smith JUST left Fox. Him having been a liberal host up until just now...THAT ALONE...still makes Fox more balanced than anyone else...how many conservative hosts on CNN and MSNBC (starting to comprehend why Fox dominates the ratings yet?).

-Citing three easy examples of liberals at Fox News in no way implies that they are the only ones that exist or have existed there. Weak fallacy. Bob Beckel, Evan Bayh, James Carville, Kirsten Powers, Alan Colmes, Tamara Holder, Sally Kohn...just to name a few. The numbers--and the ratings--indicate that Fox is far more fair and balanced, even if that doesn't fit with your worldview. Next.

-And yes, all it takes to demonstrate that Fox is more liberal-friendly than any other network is conservative-friendly is showing three or four liberal members and/or hosts...that is how biased YOUR news media is.

View attachment 12237

Try again.

Yup.

Of all the cable media, FOX is the closest thing to ‘fair and balanced’ and I don’t know if there’s a close second. Hannity is a mindless ideologue, granted. But he has one hour on week days. Their reportage only *seems* right-slanting relative to the rest of cable media—which slants hard left. Way hard left, in MSNBC’s case.

Many viewers get this, which is why Fox consistently wins the ratings battle.
 
I'm saving this to use, if it's OK;)

It's perfect for you! After all, who does the most whining around here about others allegedly being obsessed with you, when in fact it's exactly the other way around, my persistent stalker? :laugh:
 
Yup.

Of all the cable media, FOX is the closest thing to ‘fair and balanced’ and I don’t know if there’s a close second. Hannity is a mindless ideologue, granted. But he has one hour on week days. Their reportage only *seems* right-slanting relative to the rest of cable media—which slants hard left. Way hard left, in MSNBC’s case.

Many viewers get this, which is why Fox consistently wins the ratings battle.

Hahaha, that's hilarious. The other day I opened their website when you RWers were still spazzing out about Taylor and closed hearings. I wondered if they had mentioned that Taylor provided a 15-page summary of his testimony to the press, and possibly even a link to it for their viewers' edification, since you all were claiming that everything in the news about the hearings was biased and came from the (D)s. Nope. In fact, the top story (in giant font) was about the little boy in Texas whose parents are in a custody battle over him and his desire to be female. There was also a story about chicken sandwiches, and some whining about the unfairness towards some Xtian doctor who allegedly was fired for not wanting to use a trans person's preferred pronouns.

I then looked under the news and the politics tabs. Nothing about Taylor at all. So apparently "fair and balanced" = not providing stories about events that are unflattering to whichever Reichwing overlord currently squats in our White House. We must maintain the myth that the hearings are all super secret and only contain (D)s and the "real Americans" are shut out.

GzZXDBj.jpg
 
That didn't take long;)
The strategy is to accuse others of what you yourself are guilty of and the dummies buy into it.
 
You mean... like repeatedly stating publicly that you believe the head of state of one of our enemies over your own intel community? Like claiming you have a great relationship with another enemy who has constantly threatened us with his emerging nuclear powers, saying that he writes you love letters and you believe him when he says he's not going to make nukes anymore -- while he's lobbing ballistic missiles hither and yon? That kind of "Aid and Comfort"?

Exactly. I don't know of any other president who scorned and insulted our allies while cozying up to dictators and strong men. trump may think he's being the great negotiator by treating these people with such warmth, but he doesn't need to criticize our allies in the process. He's taken shots at the UK, France, Germany, Canada, Mexico and others, and I wonder what he's trying to prove.
 
Back
Top