Trump reassuming the presidency by August

Not quite, and you missed again. I think you may be playing the wrong board game. Again, link us up to "them" telling us all about this August thing... I heard Trump this AM during an interview note that he was not going to run for Senate in 2022 but didn't rule out running for President in 2024. If he really thought that he was going to installed in August and was telling "all those around him" that he was, he wouldn't be thinking about running in 2024 now would he?

'Them', is not the same as 'anonymous sources or 'sources close to the President'. It's nuance. My board game is, I guess, more complicated and nuanced than yours. I'd rather play chess than checkers. My board game isn't wrong, it's just different than yours. I'm the chess master. I'm sure you're very good at checkers. Congrats.

Your conclusion is illogical. Trump lies when the truth will do. You have no idea what his statement means, and your conclusion requires a massive leap.
 
'Them', is not the same as 'anonymous sources or 'sources close to the President'. It's nuance. My board game is, I guess, more complicated and nuanced than yours. I'd rather play chess than checkers. My board game isn't wrong, it's just different than yours. I'm the chess master. I'm sure you're very good at checkers. Congrats.

Your conclusion is illogical. Trump lies when the truth will do. You have no idea what his statement means, and your conclusion requires a massive leap.

Unfortunately your daddy must have told you that Candyland was "chess" because your feels (nuance) are not a valid source of information.
 
Who is "they" and if they are then give us a link. "Sources say" is just code for "It's made up, but about Trump so we say whatever we want and TrumpHaters always believe it." Even the ones who think they are smart will believe whatever somebody says so long as it is negative about Trump.

people who are not not necessarily online.
 
Unfortunately your daddy must have told you that Candyland was "chess" because your feels (nuance) are not a valid source of information.

When you are down to ad homs, you lose, whether it's chess or candy land.

Carry on.
 
Why are none of the JPP cultists posting about Trump's psychotic claim that he'll snatch the presidency from Biden by August? Do they not believe their fuhrer any longer? Are they embarrassed to attach their names to yet another lie? This story seems strangely quiet here.

They are overcome with happiness, unable to speak so great is their emotion over this pronouncement from on high. When August comes and Trump's only movement is riding in a golf court they'll take a breath and start waiting all over again.
 
I know Trumptards don't understand this, but there is a code of ethics in Journalism. No one who follows that code is posting an independent source without fact checking independently what the source is saying. Therefore, when considering whether an anonymous source or a source close to 'x', the entity that's reporting that is instructive as to whether or not we believe it. The NYT does not make shit up. It isn't fake news. They verify, they fact check, and they don't go with a story unless they are 100% confident that the story is accurate. When they make mistakes (and they do happen), their competition can't wait to hammer them on those mistakes. Brietbart does not hold itself to that standard. So claiming that those sources are just making things up is lazy and sloppy.
 
I know Trumptards don't understand this, but there is a code of ethics in Journalism. No one who follows that code is posting an independent source without fact checking independently what the source is saying. Therefore, when considering whether an anonymous source or a source close to 'x', the entity that's reporting that is instructive as to whether or not we believe it. The NYT does not make shit up. It isn't fake news. They verify, they fact check, and they don't go with a story unless they are 100% confident that the story is accurate. When they make mistakes (and they do happen), their competition can't wait to hammer them on those mistakes. Brietbart does not hold itself to that standard. So claiming that those sources are just making things up is lazy and sloppy.

It's also a code of standards. Before starting a different career I spent five and a half years as a newspaper reporter and editor working under that standard with others doing the same. It's aggravating to hear people who couldn't write a piece of journalism to save their lives put down the "the main stream press".
 
It's also a code of standards. Before starting a different career I spent five and a half years as a newspaper reporter and editor working under that standard with others doing the same. It's aggravating to hear people who couldn't write a piece of journalism to save their lives put down the "the main stream press".

Agreed. And standards is more easily understood by the Trumptards, the concept of ethics is lost on them. A major component of evaluating the veracity of something is to consider the source using critical thinking skills. Again, right over their heads, but I digress. When evaluating a factual article, I ask 'who is the author', 'who published the article', 'what is their record for being accurate','does it pass the common sense test' that type of stuff. They consider an email to be as valid as an article in the NYT. The stupidity is sublime.
 
Not quite, and you missed again. I think you may be playing the wrong board game. Again, link us up to "them" telling us all about this August thing... I heard Trump this AM during an interview note that he was not going to run for Senate in 2022 but didn't rule out running for President in 2024. If he really thought that he was going to installed in August and was telling "all those around him" that he was, he wouldn't be thinking about running in 2024 now would he?

Plenty of stories about Trump thinking he will be back in office. https://www.azcentral.com/story/opi...ald-trump-reinstated-coup-attempt/7505953002/
 
No, it is not code for that. I suppose you think Watergate was made up too?

SOURCES NAMED IN WATERGATE.



LOOK AT THE EMOTIONAL/MENTALLY ILL JPP LEFT STILL PROMOTING THEIR MADEUP BULLSHIT ,ALTHOUGH IT'S TRUE...
:laugh:

10y55j.jpg
 
And none of them name a single source, this was my point. It has been proven way too often to be simply made up crap, and for anybody with a brain and even a modicum of self respect, you should demand actual sourcing, especially when it is something you really want to believe about Trump.

So, you don't think Trump has said that, or believes that?
 
And none of them name a single source, this was my point. It has been proven way too often to be simply made up crap, and for anybody with a brain and even a modicum of self respect, you should demand actual sourcing, especially when it is something you really want to believe about Trump.

Why do I want to believe that about him? He is the motherlode of entitlement. Trump has agreed with people who said he will be back in office in august.. He does not have the integrity to rebuke any follower, no matter how crazy, that they are wrong. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...cs/trump-coup-august-reinstated-b1857632.html
 
Why are none of the JPP cultists posting about Trump's psychotic claim that he'll snatch the presidency from Biden by August? Do they not believe their fuhrer any longer? Are they embarrassed to attach their names to yet another lie? This story seems strangely quiet here.

Trump never said that. Fake News.
 
They are overcome with happiness, unable to speak so great is their emotion over this pronouncement from on high. When August comes and Trump's only movement is riding in a golf court they'll take a breath and start waiting all over again.

I'm sure the cult is still waiting for Trump's tax returns, Hillary's arrest, Obama's blood test, and certainly Trump's impossible return to an office he never deserved in the first place. No one who matters takes them seriously anymore.
 
I know Trumptards don't understand this, but there is a code of ethics in Journalism. No one who follows that code is posting an independent source without fact checking independently what the source is saying. Therefore, when considering whether an anonymous source or a source close to 'x', the entity that's reporting that is instructive as to whether or not we believe it. The NYT does not make shit up. It isn't fake news. They verify, they fact check, and they don't go with a story unless they are 100% confident that the story is accurate. When they make mistakes (and they do happen), their competition can't wait to hammer them on those mistakes. Brietbart does not hold itself to that standard. So claiming that those sources are just making things up is lazy and sloppy.

Anything they don't like is "fake news". Anonymous sourcing has existed for as long as journalism has. Suddenly when Trump stuck his pinky toe dick up their collective asses they decided to retreat for eternity into a land of conspiracy theories and outright denial of reality. They're all mentally ill, to put it politely.
 
Because they don't believe the claim that he even says it. They believe, as the evidence has often shown, that "Reports" with no sourcing have, in the past, been less than truthful. Why do you think the "Trumpers" aren't talking about it? You think it is because they "really believe" or something?

I see you use as much evidence as those making these stories up.

Here's a video of trump talking about "soon." Neither 2022 nor 2024 are "soon."

 
Back
Top