Trump says he'll fight 'all the subpoenas'

I love it when asshats who know I have them on ignore still post to me.

It's their way of saying they're my bitch. And that TD literally likes to eat poopoo!

Fun!!!!
 
Mueller documented ten instances of potential obstruction, plus we have the 24/7 designed media attack on Mueller, that is hardly what I would label 100% cooperation

NOTHING contained in the Mueller report supports your hysterical assertions. If it were so obvious, why not recommend impeachment? Why would the AG construct a coherent reasoning why there was no obstruction based on what is contained in the report. You really should read it.

Here is the most cogent reasoning there could be no obstruction; there was no criminal conspiracy to hide anything or to obstruct about. The premise of the entire investigation was based on a HOAX and false narratives presented by corrupt government operatives like Comey.

WH attorneys did see the report prior to Barr releasing it, Barr even confirmed that in his weird press conference

That is standard procedure. How is that wrong, you sad, pathetic, whiny little moron?

Been they this before,

Gonna need a moron interpreter for this gobbledygook.

I even showed you the video, the actual term was actually "coincidentally" mentioned earlier by a GOP representative, and Barr employed it emphatically in response to the Democrat representative's question. In either case, "spying" is not the usual legal terminology an AG uses, especially when not offering any proof. It was done as sketched out for him

Why? What was the purpose or need for a press conference, especially prior to anyone other than the WH seeimg it? He was framing it, setting the stage on how he wanted the public to interpret it, as I noted, orchestrated

Seriously? You want to know why the AG would have a press conference prior to releasing a summary of the most sensationalized HOAX in the last three decades? :laugh:

When testifying, usually when challenged, several times he offered the "whataboutism," the, well Obama did this, or Clinton did this, totally unnecessary unless one wanted to explain it a way the base could relate

Usually, in the REAL world and not the lunatic realm you leftist dumb fucks wallow in, one does not need to testify when one has not been charged with any crime.
 
Last edited:
So the House can play the impeachment game.

The Party of the Jackass will play it; they have no more straws they can grasp at. The complicit media will continue to fuel the furor with more false narratives and "what-ifs" and the left will continue looking like a bunch of dishonest, lunatic morons on steroids.

They can't help themselves. The vitriol they have for Trump and his supporters is palpable.
 
Sure it is orchestrated, everything Trump does is by design, it is a deflection, you can't be that naive

And read the memo, Mueller was appointed to investigate Russian involvement in the election, fact, and he found plenty of it especially circling the Trump campaign, there were Russians everywhere, but it appears having a hostile foreign nation involved in our democratic processes is no big deal for Trumpkins, would love to have seen their reaction if it was an Obama campaign that sought help for Putin

And not being found guilty of a criminal act doesn't mean Trump is totally exonerated as Mueller stated. The Trump defense "he didn't break any laws" doesn't mean other matters shouldn't be examined.

It's not up to a SP to exonerate.
Exoneration refers to a court order that discharges a person from liability. In criminal context the term exonerate refers to a state where a person convicted of a crime is later proved to be innocent.
 
Mueller documented ten instances of potential obstruction, plus we have the 24/7 designed media attack on Mueller, that is hardly what I would label 100% cooperation
lol. "Media attack on Mueller" Mueller is held up as Gospel by the media, with saintly purposes. Should Trump not be able to go after Mueller as illegitimate since Trump did not collude? That's what inncent people do -protest loudly at the process.
But for all the Trump talking there was NO ACTS of obstruction to impinge the Mueller investigation in any way.

WH attorneys did see the report prior to Barr releasing it, Barr even confirmed that in his weird press conference
I didn't see the actual conference -OK -I do know Barr would not confirm any release to the WH prior. all of which means what exactly? Barr fiathfully summarized the conclusions of Mueller and the WH did not ask for any privilege

Been they this before, I even showed you the video, the actual term was actually "coincidentally" mentioned earlier by a GOP representative, and Barr employed it emphatically in response to the Democrat representative's question. In either case, "spying" is not the usual legal terminology an AG uses, especially when not offering any proof. It was done as sketched out for him
what? i can't follow that meandering.

you have no proof of Barr collusion with the GOP rep. Barr even qualified his use of the word "spying"
At minimum it was an FBI informant placed in contact to pump Papadopolis for info.
Sounds like spying to me - if it was all innocent;why not give a 'defensive briefing' to Trump officials they were getting Russians trying to collude?
Why? What was the purpose or need for a press conference, especially prior to anyone other than the WH seeimg it? He was framing it, setting the stage on how he wanted the public to interpret it, as I noted, orchestrated
a 15 minute press conference isn't going to last long as public opinion compared to the avalaanche of 2 years oflies from CNN /NYT & WAPO "sources" etc.
Barr was well within his purview as well. The Mueller report was released to him

When testifying, usually when challenged, several times he offered the "whataboutism," the, well Obama did this, or Clinton did this, totally unnecessary unless one wanted to explain it a way the base could relate
you'd have to give me specifics in context -me trying to answer otherwise is too general
I remind you again this is all going to come tol ight with the upcoming IG report and maybe more investigations of the Deep State. Man you are going to see all kind of corruption
 
Congressional hot air over "financial crimes" alleged by Cohen is the ultimate in political orchestration
stop telling me what to do -3 times now you have mischaracterized the Mueller charter as "investigate Russian involvement in the election" without fully disclosing Mueller was charged to find whethere or not there was Russian collusion ( conspiracy) that was why a SC was appointed instead of a simple FBI intelligence investigation
I'm not responding to the rest of that Russiaphobia

hogwash. prosecutors never exonerate

I am not "telling you," rather giving you the facts, here it is, why Mueller was appointed, "to ensure a full and thorough investigation of the Russian Government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election"

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html

Amazing how much Trumpkins profess to understand facts but it is obvious most of them never ever read any of the primary sources they are talking about, found the same with the FICA applications and even the Mueller Report

And if you read pgs 66-180 of the Mueller report you'd see it was more than just "Russiaphobia," Putin's people seemingly did everything but park cars, which the Trump campaign was aware of all the time
 
I am not "telling you," rather giving you the facts, here it is, why Mueller was appointed, "to ensure a full and thorough investigation of the Russian Government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election"

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html

LIE, LAME and STUPID. How do you get "to ensure a full and thorough investigation of the Russian Government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election" out of "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump" you ignorant asswhipe?

Robert S. Mueller III is appointed to serve as Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice.

(b) The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confined by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and

(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and

(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).

(c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.

(d) Sections 600.4 through 600. l 0 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations are applicable to the Special Counsel.


https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/appointment-special-counsel


Amazing how much Trumpkins profess to understand facts but it is obvious most of them never ever read any of the primary sources they are talking about, found the same with the FICA applications and even the Mueller Report

What's more amazing is what a dumb, lying asshat you can be.

And if you read pgs 66-180 of the Mueller report you'd see it was more than just "Russiaphobia," Putin's people seemingly did everything but park cars, which the Trump campaign was aware of all the time

Read it; doesn't say what you are claiming you addle minded lying hack.
 
lol. "Media attack on Mueller" Mueller is held up as Gospel by the media, with saintly purposes. Should Trump not be able to go after Mueller as illegitimate since Trump did not collude? That's what inncent people do -protest loudly at the process.
But for all the Trump talking there was NO ACTS of obstruction to impinge the Mueller investigation in any way.

I didn't see the actual conference -OK -I do know Barr would not confirm any release to the WH prior. all of which means what exactly? Barr fiathfully summarized the conclusions of Mueller and the WH did not ask for any privilege

what? i can't follow that meandering.

you have no proof of Barr collusion with the GOP rep. Barr even qualified his use of the word "spying"
At minimum it was an FBI informant placed in contact to pump Papadopolis for info.
Sounds like spying to me - if it was all innocent;why not give a 'defensive briefing' to Trump officials they were getting Russians trying to collude?
a 15 minute press conference isn't going to last long as public opinion compared to the avalaanche of 2 years oflies from CNN /NYT & WAPO "sources" etc.
Barr was well within his purview as well. The Mueller report was released to him

you'd have to give me specifics in context -me trying to answer otherwise is too general
I remind you again this is all going to come tol ight with the upcoming IG report and maybe more investigations of the Deep State. Man you are going to see all kind of corruption

Well, let's see, if one is constantly attacking another knowing that his verbal assaults will be echoed endlessly and endorsed faithfully by an entire media it doesn't quite seem you are cooperating with the individual you are attacking. And last I knew, obstructing that person wouldn't either be exactly defined as cooperating with that person

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...ump-fully-cooperate-mueller-investigation-no/

The White House did see the Mueller Report before Barr released it to the public

https://www.businessinsider.com/bar...use-executive-privilege-legal-analysis-2019-3

He "qualified his use of the word," point being, why did he even use the word, it is not the usually legal explanation of surveillance, as I said, it plays right into the Trump narrative the base loves that Trump was spied upon by Obama. It was orchestrated

Barr is the Attorney General of the country, not a media outlet, and the press conference, as the summary, were bizarre, totally uncalled for, the proper method would have been releasing the report to allow Amwricans to read it before he commented. He was framing the results, openly defending Trump

For the latter, you tube his testimony and it is all there, the first time early on if I am not mistaken

And Barr is not going to investigate anything, you know there was a reason Trump never released an unredacted version of the FICA applications even though he said he was and his House and his media screamed for it. Last thing Trump wants to do is reopen the early stages of his campaign. All bluster serving as a deflection
 
Well, let's see, if one is constantly attacking another knowing that his verbal assaults will be echoed endlessly and endorsed faithfully by an entire media it doesn't quite seem you are cooperating with the individual you are attacking. And last I knew, obstructing that person wouldn't either be exactly defined as cooperating with that person

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...ump-fully-cooperate-mueller-investigation-no/

The White House did see the Mueller Report before Barr released it to the public

https://www.businessinsider.com/bar...use-executive-privilege-legal-analysis-2019-3

He "qualified his use of the word," point being, why did he even use the word, it is not the usually legal explanation of surveillance, as I said, it plays right into the Trump narrative the base loves that Trump was spied upon by Obama. It was orchestrated

Barr is the Attorney General of the country, not a media outlet, and the press conference, as the summary, were bizarre, totally uncalled for, the proper method would have been releasing the report to allow Amwricans to read it before he commented. He was framing the results, openly defending Trump

For the latter, you tube his testimony and it is all there, the first time early on if I am not mistaken

And Barr is not going to investigate anything, you know there was a reason Trump never released an unredacted version of the FICA applications even though he said he was and his House and his media screamed for it. Last thing Trump wants to do is reopen the early stages of his campaign. All bluster serving as a deflection

enjoy-your-trump-russia-nothingburger-nothingburger-cnn-24287253.png
 
LIE, LAME and STUPID. How do you get "to ensure a full and thorough investigation of the Russian Government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election" out of "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump" you ignorant asswhipe?

Robert S. Mueller III is appointed to serve as Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice.

(b) The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confined by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and

(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and

(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).

(c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.

(d) Sections 600.4 through 600. l 0 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations are applicable to the Special Counsel.


https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/appointment-special-counsel

What's more amazing is what a dumb, lying asshat you can be.

Read it; doesn't say what you are claiming you addle minded lying hack.

Are you really that daft, the word including, let me repeat that, including, does not mean what is to be included is the primary focus of the investigation, its' reason for being, why it was started, what is its primary function

You even do poorly attempting to play with semantics

(time for a corny copy and paste)
 
Are you really that daft, the word including, let me repeat that, including, does not mean what is to be included is the primary focus of the investigation, its' reason for being, why it was started, what is its primary function

You even do poorly attempting to play with semantics

(time for a corny copy and paste)

It had nothing to do with investigation of the Russian Government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election you brain dead dumb fuck.
 
That means "truthie" is done, got nothing to offer, keep telling him the corny copy and pasts are like the towel hitting the canvas but he doesn't comprehend it

No; it means that it is pointless to argue with someone who is a pathological lying dumbfuck with no connection to reality you asshat.

How does one begin to have a conversation with someone who can't even get Mueller's appointment correct? You're nothing but a whiny leftist loser who apparently has no issues proving what a painfully ignorant dumbass you are every damned day.

You truly are a waste of bandwidth. From now on, I will just point at your dumb lying ass and laigh.
 
President Trump said Wednesday that he intends to fight "all the subpoenas" issued by the House, setting up a drawn-out battle between the White House and congressional Democrats.

"We're fighting all the subpoenas," Trump told reporters as he left the White House for a conference in Atlanta on opioid abuse.

Trump dismissed a subpoena from the House Judiciary Committee for testimony from former White House counsel Don McGahn as "ridiculous."

"We have been, I have been the most transparent president and administration in the history of our country by far," Trump said.

The president asserted that Democrats are investigating his administration and issuing subpoenas for political reasons, suggesting it would help the party in the 2020 election.

"Look these aren't impartial people," he said. "The Democrats are trying to win 2020. They're not going to win with the people I see, and they're not going to win against me."

"The only way they can luck out is by constantly going after me on nonsense," he added.

The president has in recent days excoriated Democrats for carrying out investigations into his administration and him personally, particularly in the wake of special counsel Robert Mueller's report.

"I say it’s enough," Trump said. "Get back to infrastructure. Get back to cutting taxes. Get back to lowering drug prices."
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/440409-trump-says-hell-fight-all-the-subpoenas

He should. Out of principle alone. Show the arrogant bastards how little power they really have.
 
Back
Top