Trump says, "US must respond!" after Iran shoots down a helicopter....

In about two weeks…
...and then two weeks after
.
...and then two weeks after
.
...and then two weeks after
.
Because obviously 'obliterating a nuclear program and claiming that Iran will not be a threat for years to come' really means Iran will be a threat to the US such that in 'two weeks' they could destroy America and thus this war had to be launched

Because obviously when you 'decimate Irans military such that there is nothing left' means just weeks later you have to go back and bomb it again.

In Matt's world words have no meaning. Trump can 'win' the war today but be engaged in the fighting tomorrow and that works for his addled brain and he does not question it and just claps like a seal.

anbp02.gif
 
Since the beginning of this new war, and Trumps clear desire to find a way out, this analyst has detailed the 'escalation trap' Trump has put America in, and how Israel and Iran will have more control over how this ends, and when.

He has been correct at almost every stage in his analysis and then what has followed.

 
BTW can a single magats here tell us if this means the 'cease fire' is over or if Trump will claim this does not end the cease fire?

Anyone willing to go on the record as to what Trump will say when asked about this? @Matt Dillon , @Damocles , @FastLane , anyone?

This is a serious question as prior Trump has been saying that none of the firing going back and forth between the US, Israel and Iran meant the cease fire was over. So Trump, forces us to question this, despite it seeming a bit absurd by any rational person.
 
BTW can a single magats here tell us if this means the 'cease fire' is over or if Trump will claim this does not end the cease fire?

Anyone willing to go on the record as to what Trump will say when asked about this? @Matt Dillon , @Damocles , @FastLane , anyone?

This is a serious question as prior Trump has been saying that none of the firing going back and forth between the US, Israel and Iran meant the cease fire was over. So Trump, forces us to question this, despite it seeming a bit absurd by any rational person.
Why do you ask me to explain the actions of someone that I do not support? You can go ahead and assign whatever you want, I do not care.
 
Why do you ask me to explain the actions of someone that I do not support?
:rofl2:

You are one of the most likely people on this forum to jump in and try and deflect and defend Trump when someone is pointing out something negative, by trying to use a whataboutism to change the topic.

You are in the top tier of this forum for that. But unlike most magats you are in complete denial about it.


You can go ahead and assign whatever you want, I do not care.
Assign = call out with fact and truth. And i will whether you care or not.
 
:rofl2:

You are one of the most likely people on this forum to jump in and try and deflect and defend Trump when someone is pointing out something negative, by trying to use a whataboutism to change the topic.

You are in the top tier of this forum for that. But unlike most magats you are in complete denial about it.



Assign = call out with fact and truth. And i will whether you care or not.
Again, do not care. I drew attention to his pattern. You think that Damocles is the person to be "got" for some idiot reason. Small minds talk about people rather than ideas, and cannot fully comprehend the larger picture. The smaller the mind the more sure they are in their insistence that we talk about each other over the larger picture. I am attracted to people that offer "more" than you do to a conversation. So, I ask again. Why is it important to you that I "explain" something I have never expressed support for as a supposed "MAGA" though I never voted for Trump? (Not even the first time to keep HillBillary from that office (though I admit I was close).)

You are a little man with a small and weak mind.
 
Again, do not care. I drew attention to his pattern. You think that Damocles is the person to be "got" for some idiot reason. Small minds talk about people rather than ideas, and cannot fully comprehend the larger picture. The smaller the mind the more sure they are in their insistence that we talk about each other over the larger picture. I am attracted to people that offer "more" than you do to a conversation. So, I ask again. Why is it important to you that I "explain" something I have never expressed support for as a supposed "MAGA" though I never voted for Trump? (Not even the first time to keep HillBillary from that office (though I admit I was close).)

You are a little man with a small and weak mind.
oh you are such an evolved person. I like the way you brag about yourself as you envision yourself sitting above the people here and not engaging them and just addressing high minded concepts. :rofl2:

Meanwhile in reality, on chat forums, we engage with the people WE CHAT WITH. We debate them. We call them out for hypocrisy or when then they are wrong.

it is what chat forums like this ARE SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR. To get people to engage with one another and fight over their ideas and positions.
 
Its not just Trump.....it is also the mainline media and experts who keep lying to the American people.....that stays even if Trump goes...making this all about Trump is moronic.
While i agree with your post broadly. not making Trump the focus of it, would be moronic. This is the war he demanded and now lies about daily and YES the main stream media is complicit in all of it.
 
BTW can a single magats here tell us if this means the 'cease fire' is over or if Trump will claim this does not end the cease fire?

Anyone willing to go on the record as to what Trump will say when asked about this? @Matt Dillon , @Damocles , @FastLane , anyone?

This is a serious question as prior Trump has been saying that none of the firing going back and forth between the US, Israel and Iran meant the cease fire was over. So Trump, forces us to question this, despite it seeming a bit absurd by any rational person.
Trump even redefines cease fire. Now instead of stopping the shooting, it is less conflict; Trump has to defy the level of shooting for us. If it is cut in half, is it a cease fire? How about one-third?
 
Trump even redefines cease fire. Now instead of stopping the shooting, it is less conflict; Trump has to defy the level of shooting for us. If it is cut in half, is it a cease fire? How about one-third?
yup. that is why i asked for a magat to clarify since cease fire no longer means 'ceasing firing' in Trump language.
 
BTW can a single magats here tell us if this means the 'cease fire' is over or if Trump will claim this does not end the cease fire?

Anyone willing to go on the record as to what Trump will say when asked about this? @Matt Dillon , @Damocles , @FastLane , anyone?

This is a serious question as prior Trump has been saying that none of the firing going back and forth between the US, Israel and Iran meant the cease fire was over. So Trump, forces us to question this, despite it seeming a bit absurd by any rational person.
We have not been at war with Iran for weeks. Any new actions are part of a new war in Iran
 
We have not been at war with Iran for weeks. Any new actions are part of a new war in Iran
yes we know the magats weasel lines used here.

Active firing by both sides = cease fire...

We are in a war... but its not war... it was never a war... but it is a war...

Since we declared the war over... the war we never had... it is only "skirmishes" happening in the last few weeks...


Up is down... down is up... left is right...
 
While i agree with your post broadly. not making Trump the focus of it, would be moronic. This is the war he demanded and now lies about daily and YES the main stream media is complicit in all of it.
This is a war that has been planned for at least three decades.
 
Back
Top