Trump's really really really really really really bad day gets FAR worse

Individual income tax returns — including those of public figures — are private information, protected by law from unauthorized disclosure.
Indeed, the Internal Revenue Service is barred from releasing any taxpayer information whatsoever, except to authorized agencies and individuals.
 
AssHatZombie said:
so is there no presumption of privacy between individuals and government institutions? is this a road you want to go down?
Click to expand...

I know of no legal requirement of privacy between individuals and government institutions. I believe in open government.
 
dukkha said:
Individual income tax returns — including those of public figures — are private information, protected by law from unauthorized disclosure.
Indeed, the Internal Revenue Service is barred from releasing any taxpayer information whatsoever, except to authorized agencies and individuals.
Click to expand...

Except when they are not protected by law.... like when the Chairman of the ways and means Committee asks for them in writing.
 
OUCH!........just keeps getting worse

Judge says Deutsche Bank, Capital One can give Trump financial records to House Democrats

Source: CNBC

A federal judge in New York City on Wednesday said Deutsche Bank and Capitol One can turn over financial documents related to President Donald Trump and his businesses in response to subpoenas from House Democrats.

Judge Edgardo Ramos’s ruling came after a hearing at which lawyers for Trump, his three older children, and the Trump Organization argued that the subpoenas to the two banks should be quashed. His decision came two days after another federal judge, in Washington, D.C., said Trump’s accountants at the firm Mazars LLP had to comply with a congressional subpoena for his financial records.

Deutsche Bank for years has been the main lender for Trump, whom other banks have avoided loaning money to because of his repeated bankruptcies. Capital One is in posssesion of financial records related to the Trump Organization’s hotels. Neither bank had opposed the subpoeanas.

But the Trump family’s lawyers, in a lawsuit filed in late April, challenged the demands for financial documents to the lenders, saying House Democrats “were issued to harass President Donald J. Trump, to rummage through every aspect of his personal finances, his businesses, and the private information of the President and his family.”

Trump has said he is “fighting all the subpoenas” issued by the Democratic-led House.

(edited for first update)

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/22/jud...pshare|com.apple.UIKit.activity.PostToTwitter
 
Imagine if President Obama hadn't shown his tax returns?


Hell.....he couldn't even read off a teleprompter without the racist white man shitting his pants.
 
Jarod said:
Where does the 4th Amendment say the Government is prohibited from making public papers that were submitted to them? Papers they already have?

How in the world is releasing information they already have a search or seizure?

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,[a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Click to expand...

So, your social security number can be released to the public willy nilly? Personal information is not protected in any way? Are you literally retarded?
 
reagansghost said:
Judge says Deutsche Bank, Capital One can give Trump financial records to House Democrats

Source: CNBC

A federal judge in New York City on Wednesday said Deutsche Bank and Capitol One can turn over financial documents related to President Donald Trump and his businesses in response to subpoenas from House Democrats.

Judge Edgardo Ramos’s ruling came after a hearing at which lawyers for Trump, his three older children, and the Trump Organization argued that the subpoenas to the two banks should be quashed. His decision came two days after another federal judge, in Washington, D.C., said Trump’s accountants at the firm Mazars LLP had to comply with a congressional subpoena for his financial records.

Deutsche Bank for years has been the main lender for Trump, whom other banks have avoided loaning money to because of his repeated bankruptcies. Capital One is in posssesion of financial records related to the Trump Organization’s hotels. Neither bank had opposed the subpoeanas.

But the Trump family’s lawyers, in a lawsuit filed in late April, challenged the demands for financial documents to the lenders, saying House Democrats “were issued to harass President Donald J. Trump, to rummage through every aspect of his personal finances, his businesses, and the private information of the President and his family.”

Trump has said he is “fighting all the subpoenas” issued by the Democratic-led House.

(edited for first update)

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/22/jud...pshare|com.apple.UIKit.activity.PostToTwitter
Click to expand...

Right, this is the law. Now the Rumpers will cry, but the law is clear. These elected officials have the duty of oversight.
 
TTQ64 said:
Imagine if President Obama hadn't shown his tax returns?


Hell.....he couldn't even read off a teleprompter without the racist white man shitting his pants.
Click to expand...

Remember when they demanded his Birth Certificate, LONG FORM. Remember when they made public records request and sued for the release of the Birth Certificate?
 
Jarod said:
I know of no legal requirement of privacy between individuals and government institutions. I believe in open government.
Click to expand...

so its ok if the irs publicizes all your personal data?

that's a bizarre implementation of open government, quite retarded, in fact.
 
countryboy said:
So, your social security number can be released to the public willy nilly? Personal information is not protected in any way? Are you literally retarded?
Click to expand...

It is not legally protected. They should not release peoples SSN's because the information can be used for fraud, but they have the legal right to do it.

Id likely vote against one that did that, but thats about the only remedy.
 
Jarod said:
They have a legitimate reason. Oversight of the Executive.

Grounded?
Click to expand...

the bot will come back and say 'there's no legislative justification for the subpoena'

and yet the Congress investigates crimes all the time for the purpose of crafting legislation to fight those crimes

completely moronic stance by Putin
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top