Unprecedented, historic corruption:

Denial of logic. False authority fallacy. Semantics fallacy.

I think the law you are looking for is lunatic fellatio fallacy. It's as real as your 'law' lol.
And no you have nothing to bring to the table. No rebuttal and other than hiding behind words nothing of substance. Thank you for clarifying.
 
It is not substantial because YOU call it substantial. I have already shown why it is not substantial. Argument by repetition fallacy. Buzzword fallacy.

7 felonies that can get you 20 years in prison is substantial in any (reasonable) person's book.

Bill Clinton was impeached for a "process crime."
 
You never know, but when Assange shows up in court on Sept 7, new evidence may suggest Stone even told more lies, and new charges could be on the way for Stone.

This thang ain't over til it's over! LOL!

Double jeopardy. You can't try a man for the same crime. Framing him as Mueller did will just get thrown out again.
 
Bill Clinton was not convicted either, and served no prison time.

Impeachment is still a major event caused by a "process crime." It had a major impact ruling sitting presidents could be sued in civil actions. He also lost the civil case and agreed to give up his law license.
 
ha ha ha ha.. nutz. Stone was never charged with anything like that

HA HA HA yes he was. 7 felonies. Among them lying to the court and congress. He is a disgusting man who certainly belongs with Trump. Witness tampering. Stone was the go-between for Russia/Assange and the Trump campaign. He kept Trump up to date on everything they were doing. This commutation saves Trump. It also keeps Stone out of jail for now. Perhaps he can fight state charges. He surely does not deserve to get away with so many crimes.
 
I did not say it was a crime. I said impeachment is a major event. An event and a crime are not the same thing. Informal fallacy
Never said you did. Fallacy fallacy. Contextomy fallacy.
Except on presidents who are sued in civil cases while in office.
Impeachment makes no difference. Non-sequitur fallacy.
The new SC case says they can also be investigated in state crimes.
They always could. Nothing new here.
 
HA HA HA yes he was. 7 felonies. Among them lying to the court and congress.
He did not lie to the court or Congress. He made some misstatements to Mueller's committee while they were grilling him.
He is a disgusting man
Inversion fallacy. Insult fallacy.
who certainly belongs with Trump.
Untreated TDS.
Witness tampering. Stone was the go-between for Russia/Assange and the Trump campaign.
Not a crime. Not tampering.
He kept Trump up to date on everything they were doing.
So? Not a crime.
This commutation saves Trump.
No, it saves Stone.
It also keeps Stone out of jail for now.
Correct.
Perhaps he can fight state charges. He surely does not deserve to get away with so many crimes.
Manufactured 'crimes' by the Mueller committee. Bills of attainder are illegal in the United States.
 
Back
Top