As I understand it the 14th Amendment was debated and written to ensure that freed slaves and native Americans were given citizenship and rights thereof. It was written at time that it was necessary. Like most things, times have changed, people have found loopholes and are in my opinion abusing it. I have always been on the mind that this country is a nation of immigrants. That is what built it. I have a real problem with folks not coming here legally though.
Which excludes the children or children of children etc... And I agree with the argument that countries that don't receive a lot of immigration (which may or may not
have an unfair impact on documented citizens) isn't instructive as applied to the US or Canada. But is certainly goes to the fact of whether or not Trump simply lied.
The historical impetus for the 14th was certainly as you stated, but they wrote what they wrote, and it was well within their power and comprehension to limit the words to that impetus.
Maybe Trump should keep his promise to build his wall before he breaks another immigration policy promise. This is red meat for his base before midterms and a statement piece without real prospects for any lawmaker
who joins in the idea. The only mechanism is amendment to the Constitution, and Trump knows that, and he also knows it is not a popular idea, except to that base. 60-40 against doesn't pass
a constitutional amendment, and an EO doesn't overturn the US Constitution.
Do we want EO threats without any earnest intent gumming up the work of the Scotus to be business as usual for Presidents going forward? The list of constitutional law any Potus opposes is long,
and its irresponsible to do other than espouse that view or politic for change. But to take the added step of lying for propaganda is wrong.
