People charged with crimes get exonerated. Trump was not charged with a crime. As a matter of fact Comey told Trump that he was not under investigation at all.
It's over.
What a great question
- Thread starter Darth Omar
- Start date
People charged with crimes get exonerated. Trump was not charged with a crime. As a matter of fact Comey told Trump that he was not under investigation at all.
It's over.
Oh, they'll branch out some. They're working on making the Justice Dept. a political entity. And, now Mullet gave them a little "I'm not happy" letter from Mullet to Barr (such a coincidence just before the Barr testimony date). So, they'll try to remove Barr because he made poor little Mullet unhappy.
It's no wonder the left is so deranged. They switch allegiances on a dime. Love Mullet, hate Mullet, now they'll love Mullet again, etc. They take no stand, they blow with the wind.
So if the Toadstool was not charged with a crime, he could not be exonerated as claimed. Got it. lol
That's not the standard you applied to Hillary Clinton. Why is that?
Actually that's about IT. It's just a sometimes misused word in place of vindicated, found innocent, didn't do it, etc.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
I read enough to know about the secret meeting and the e-mail attempt.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Comey is going to be asked about that by people who can make his life difficult lol. Unless Barr is blowing smoke.
There are many questions that can be asked and ‘not answered correctly’ by several individuals [7-8?] involved in the pre-Mullet phase of the investigation. And if Barr plays as rough as Mullet did—indictments are all but certain.
If..
The press used it a lot. People got used to it. Like "collusion"...it wasn't till after the first few months of
the investigation, most of us learned that it wasn't the "correct" term. It simply became synonymous with
cooperating, conspiring, working with, etc.
Example: Comey wrote an "exoneration" letter prior to interviewing her. It really wasn't the correct word,
but the press used it for quite a while before we realized the full legal meaning. No big deal.
So, in a legal sense it might be misused a lot, the general public gets the idea of the meaning.
Comey's in deep doo-doo.
.....and NOT because he enjoys walks among the redwoods.
Was that the bit with Jr. and the Russian lawyer?
He didn't have enough evidence to indict him, did he shitforbrains?
Then why wasn't he indicted?
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
The conspiracy is the legal term for collusion.
No, whore, it's not. Please stop cunting.
Got it. Good to know that if a (D) candidate meets with, say, a NK operative to get dirt on Trump you all will be good with it.
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
No, daddy-fucker, the policy of the OLC prevented him from bringing charges.
Please be less cum-drunk
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
You should seriously consider eating less human feces. Especially from your mom.
Nellie Ohr was referred to DoJ for criminal indictment tonight.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...to-doj-about-russia-collusion-should-alarm-us
Apparently she was a conduit ( she worked at Fusion GPS) for the Steele dossier after Steele was fired.
AND
She was getting info to more then one Deep Creep
Depends if it's a true "operative", an agent of Kim's inner circle, if the Dem sought him out, or did the person approach and
make offers to the Dem instead, heard him out and said 'thanks, but no thanks', was there money exchanged, etc.