What a great question

The Obama was/ is corrupt, and Holder covered for "his guy". Holder, an appropriate name for him, don't you agree?

Yes, but the different there is that we all knew and accepted that Holder worked for Obama. I'm not excusing anything he did. I think Holder was especially horrible for saying he had the power to kill Americans suspected of terrorism without a trial. But we can't really compare his relationship to Obama with Barr's relationship with Trump. Barr is in a position where he is supposed to be impartial. And yet we know now that he's in Trump's pocket.
 
Yes, but the different there is that we all knew and accepted that Holder worked for Obama. I'm not excusing anything he did. I think Holder was especially horrible for saying he had the power to kill Americans suspected of terrorism without a trial. But we can't really compare his relationship to Obama with Barr's relationship with Trump. Barr is in a position where he is supposed to be impartial. And yet we know now that he's in Trump's pocket.

How so?

That Barr doesn’t have both feet on the impeachment train means he’s ‘in Trump’s pocket’? Barr has been a much needed breath of fresh air in this thing insofar as, finally, finally, someone is going to take a hard look at how this all got started.

For two years, a sitting president was maligned—and yes, lied about in malicious ways, because the FBI decided they wanted to play leaky Key Stone Cops. It’s patently obvious mistakes were made.

And it’s quite probable some of the ‘mistakes’ were intentional.
 
Yes, but the different there is that we all knew and accepted that Holder worked for Obama. I'm not excusing anything he did. I think Holder was especially horrible for saying he had the power to kill Americans suspected of terrorism without a trial.

BUT what??? Did you or Dumbocrats screech and cry and demand Holders resignation when Holder was Obamas bitch?

But we can't really compare his relationship to Obama with Barr's relationship with Trump. Barr is in a position where he is supposed to be impartial. And yet we know now that he's in Trump's pocket.

How has Barr not been impartial? How is calling him a criminal liar and a chicken not being incredibly stupid and destructive for the Dumbocrats.
 
BUT what??? Did you or Dumbocrats screech and cry and demand Holders resignation when Holder was Obamas bitch?

Well I'm not a member of congress, so I couldn't really do much. But I did do my best to spread awareness of how bad Obama and Holder were. Unfortunately, Romney was also a war-monger, so voting against Obama wasn't much of an option.



How has Barr not been impartial? How is calling him a criminal liar and a chicken not being incredibly stupid and destructive for the Dumbocrats.

His summary of the report left out anything that made Trump look bad.
He is a liar and as for being a chicken, well he was too much of a pussy to show up for questioning.
 
How so?

That Barr doesn’t have both feet on the impeachment train means he’s ‘in Trump’s pocket’? Barr has been a much needed breath of fresh air in this thing insofar as, finally, finally, someone is going to take a hard look at how this all got started.

For two years, a sitting president was maligned—and yes, lied about in malicious ways, because the FBI decided they wanted to play leaky Key Stone Cops. It’s patently obvious mistakes were made.

And it’s quite probable some of the ‘mistakes’ were intentional.

Wow. You truly are a clueless moron.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/05/bill-barrs-performance-was-catastrophic/588574/
 
No, it's because he purposely left out all of the things that made Trump look bad.

It wasn’t Mullet’s or Barr’s role to make Trump ‘look bad’.

Mullet was tasked with a mandate. His primary mission was to investigate for a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. Mullet demonstrated that to be a myth.

Secondary to that was the possibility that Trump obstructed justice in firing Comey. Mullet investigated that—and gave a mysterious/absurd non-exoneration—which nobody seems to be able to give a coherent answer for.

At any rate, it’s over. Mullet took his cool millions he made off the tax payers and went back to his private practice.

Time to move on.
 

2/“... two years of his administration have been dominated by allegations that have now been proven false? And, you know, to listen to some of the rhetoric, you would think that the Mueller report had found the opposite.”
___________________

If Democrats in Congress want to take my advice [they never do lol] they’d lay off Barr.

Because this isn’t playing well with voters.

10 counts of obstruction. Most of his inner circle in prison.

Great record, huh?
 
It wasn’t Mullet’s or Barr’s role to make Trump ‘look bad’.

Mullet was tasked with a mandate. His primary mission was to investigate for a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. Mullet demonstrated that to be a myth.

Secondary to that was the possibility that Trump obstructed justice in firing Comey. Mullet investigated that—and gave a mysterious/absurd non-exoneration—which nobody seems to be able to give a coherent answer for.

At any rate, it’s over. Mullet took his cool millions he made off the tax payers and went back to his private practice.

Time to move on.

LOL! There's your rank dishonest and stupidity tripping you up again.

He gave a very specific reason why didn't bring any charges. OLC policy prevented him from indicting a sitting president.

Mueller is still in the employ of the DOJ as special counsel. His grand jury is still at work.

Why repeat the same discredited lies here every, single day like a dishonest whore?
 
Back
Top