What a great question

LOL! There's your rank dishonest and stupidity tripping you up again.

He gave a very specific reason why didn't bring any charges. OLC policy prevented him from indicting a sitting president.

Mueller is still in the employ of the DOJ as special counsel. His grand jury is still at work.

Why repeat the same discredited lies here every, single day like a dishonest whore?

You need to tell CNBC lol.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cn...-report-to-attorney-general-william-barr.html

You realize Mullet can indict a ham sandwich, right? Mullet could indict you for grammar errors. Just because Mullet makes an indictment doesn’t mean the indictment is worth anything. The pathetic fact is Mullet weaseled you and The Resistance.

If House Democrats think an obstruction indictment against Trump is worth anything they need to quit whining about Barr and cite chapter and verse out of *Mullet’s report* and impeach Trump for the crime of obstruction of justice.

What are they waiting on? I’ll tell you what they’re waiting on lol.

An obstruction charge made in congress against Trump would fare no better, politically, than it would in front of a jury and most democrats are aware of it. There’s this thing called ‘exculpatory evidence’ and people would get to hear plenty of it in Trump’s favor.

No underlying crime; ALL requested documents were handed over; the president waved executive privilege; and the investigation was never materially obstructed.

If you think Mullet would show up in a courtroom with an indictment that weak I have a bridge I’d like to sell you. You were played by Mullet. He threw democrats in Congress a bone and now he just wants to duck and run out of town.

Mullet is a weasel—and we warned you.
 
\
That isn't a conclusion or statement that collusion did not occur. It's a finding that the probe did not establish an illicit conspiracy.

Please be less fucking stupid, just this once.

Totally wrong. Here are some quotes from the report you will surely dislike:

"The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."

Note: this is not saying "hmm there is stuff that looks suspicious but we can't prove it one way or the other." It says NO EVIDENCE.

More:

The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."

No evidence. None.

Here's a big doozie for your cognitive dissonence addled brain:
"The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."

NO evidence at all. None. Not a single person in the entire united states of america conspiried or colluded with russia. Again, not "we can't prove it," or "it could go either way" or "there is smoke but we can't prove fire"

It literally says, in black and white, that no evidence exists in any material form.

Suck my balls.
 
Totally wrong. Here are some quotes from the report you will surely dislike:



Note: this is not saying "hmm there is stuff that looks suspicious but we can't prove it one way or the other." It says NO EVIDENCE.

More:



No evidence. None.

Here's a big doozie for your cognitive dissonence addled brain:


NO evidence at all. None. Not a single person in the entire united states of america conspiried or colluded with russia. Again, not "we can't prove it," or "it could go either way" or "there is smoke but we can't prove fire"

It literally says, in black and white, that no evidence exists in any material form.

Suck my balls.

Find the quotes about obstruction of justice.
 
You need to tell CNBC lol.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cn...-report-to-attorney-general-william-barr.html

You realize Mullet can indict a ham sandwich, right? Mullet could indict you for grammar errors. Just because Mullet makes an indictment doesn’t mean the indictment is worth anything. The pathetic fact is Mullet weaseled you and The Resistance.

If House Democrats think an obstruction indictment against Trump is worth anything they need to quit whining about Barr and cite chapter and verse out of *Mullet’s report* and impeach Trump for the crime of obstruction of justice.

What are they waiting on? I’ll tell you what they’re waiting on lol.

An obstruction charge made in congress against Trump would fare no better, politically, than it would in front of a jury and most democrats are aware of it. There’s this thing called ‘exculpatory evidence’ and people would get to hear plenty of it in Trump’s favor.

No underlying crime; ALL requested documents were handed over; the president waved executive privilege; and the investigation was never materially obstructed.

If you think Mullet would show up in a courtroom with an indictment that weak I have a bridge I’d like to sell you. You were played by Mullet. He threw democrats in Congress a bone and now he just wants to duck and run out of town.

Mullet is a weasel—and we warned you.

No, I don't need to. Mueller cannot indict a sitting POTUS, full stop.

No underlying crime is necessary for Obstruction, as Barr admitted to, under oath, this past Tuesday.
There is no exclupatory evidence for the six instances where all three elements for Obstruction were met, nor can you cite any.

Seriously, why lie like a whore? What's the point? What do you get out of it?
 
Totally wrong. Here are some quotes from the report you will surely dislike:

Newp. I'm absolutely right about this. The Investigation uncovered over 251 different meetings between the Trump campaign and Russians, and the campaign constantly lied about all of them. You're wrong, again, as usual.
And I stated 'collusion', not 'criminal conspiracy' or 'coordination'. Words have meanings, child.
Much meaningless, dishonesty and irrelevant whore-screeching snipped

Yep, they actually did find evidence of collusion. It's in the report. Here, let me dumb it down for a retard like you. And, no, you can't suck my cock. Get up off your knees and quit begging.

https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/...4Wz8tDMFXFeFbgEDMRKMBZp-k07yFYjeHBh_nxSGe6p-A

Nice owning you, as always.
 
Find the quotes about obstruction of justice.

are you just going to ignore that the lie of russian collusion that the media was pushing for two years turned out to be a complete dud? People were saying trump jr. was going to be frog marched to jail. Clapper and brenan were on their state media networks talking about how trump committed treason. NONE of it was true. NO EVIDENCE.
 
Newp. I'm absolutely right about this. The Investigation uncovered over 251 different meetings between the Trump campaign and Russians, and the campaign constantly lied about all of them. You're wrong, again, as usual.
And I stated 'collusion', not 'criminal conspiracy' or 'coordination'. Words have meanings, child.

Yep, they actually did find evidence of collusion. It's in the report. Here, let me dumb it down for a retard like you. And, no, you can't suck my cock. Get up off your knees and quit begging.

https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/...4Wz8tDMFXFeFbgEDMRKMBZp-k07yFYjeHBh_nxSGe6p-A

Nice owning you, as always.

"The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."
 
are you just going to ignore that the lie of russian collusion that the media was pushing for two years turned out to be a complete dud? People were saying trump jr. was going to be frog marched to jail. Clapper and brenan were on their state media networks talking about how trump committed treason. NONE of it was true. NO EVIDENCE.

Newp. There was evidence, as I've supplied, silly whore. There simply wasn't enough to justify criminal conspiracy charges.

Why lie like that? Self-esteem issues? The pathological need for self-validation because of shit life decisions that you're now bitter about?

Still, it's fun to watch you run in fear of the obstruction issue.
 
"The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."

I never said it did, whore. I mentioned 'collusion', not 'criminal conspiracy'.

The report found Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails, among other things. That's collusion, no matter how hard you cry.
 
Newp. There was evidence, as I've supplied, silly whore. There simply wasn't enough to justify criminal conspiracy charges.

Why lie like that? Self-esteem issues? The pathological need for self-validation because of shit life decisions that you're now bitter about?

Still, it's fun to watch you run in fear of the obstruction issue.

no one is afraid of the obstruction thing that millions of dollars and hundreds of witnesses and 13 foreign governments and a giant investigation that found nothing. In order to have obstruction, you need to prove corrupt intent, and a president is constitutionally allowed to stop an investigation that he knows for example, he is innocent of, because that wouldn't show corrupt intent. Trump never asserted executive privileged, was incredibly transparent, and russia was completely fake news, for 2 years, it's all you and your side talked about but now you are desperate to pivot from it. There was no obstruction because there was no underlying crime. There is nothing there, you lost totally and completely and that is why trump will never be impeached, that is why nancy is staying far far away from it, and that's why a majority of americans don't support it either. Completely owned and decimated. You aren't fooling anyone, we all know you lost, and you know it too, deep down.
 
are you just going to ignore that the lie of russian collusion that the media was pushing for two years turned out to be a complete dud? People were saying trump jr. was going to be frog marched to jail. Clapper and brenan were on their state media networks talking about how trump committed treason. NONE of it was true. NO EVIDENCE.

10 counts of obstruction of justice.

Most of his inner circle in prison for lying for him.

He’s a pathologically lying piece of human shit and incompetent to boot. Keep supporting him him, dumbfuck l.
 
10 counts of obstruction of justice.

Most of his inner circle in prison for lying for him.

He’s a pathologically lying piece of human shit and incompetent to boot. Keep supporting him him, dumbfuck l.

10 counts of nothing, because he was never charged with obstruction of justice. even mueller couldn't conclusively say he did anything. you have literally nothing.

You can think whatever you want though. I will sit over here and continue to win. At some point, I shoudn't have to justify anything, you are all talk. My side gets results over and over. You can live with your delusions, I am living in the real world. No collusion, no obstruction, no impeachment. you lose.
 
no one is afraid of the obstruction thing that millions of dollars and hundreds of witnesses and 13 foreign governments and a giant investigation that found nothing. In order to have obstruction, you need to prove corrupt intent, and a president is constitutionally allowed to stop an investigation that he knows for example, he is innocent of, because that wouldn't show corrupt intent. Trump never asserted executive privileged, was incredibly transparent, and russia was completely fake news, for 2 years, it's all you and your side talked about but now you are desperate to pivot from it. There was no obstruction because there was no underlying crime. There is nothing there, you lost totally and completely and that is why trump will never be impeached, that is why nancy is staying far far away from it, and that's why a majority of americans don't support it either. Completely owned and decimated. You aren't fooling anyone, we all know you lost, and you know it too, deep down.

:lolup:

Can you describe what the toadstool’s dickcum tastes like, shitstain?
 
no one is afraid of the obstruction thing that millions of dollars and hundreds of witnesses and 13 foreign governments and a giant investigation that found nothing. In order to have obstruction, you need to prove corrupt intent, and a president is constitutionally allowed to stop an investigation that he knows for example, he is innocent of, because that wouldn't show corrupt intent. Trump never asserted executive privileged, was incredibly transparent, and russia was completely fake news, for 2 years, it's all you and your side talked about but now you are desperate to pivot from it. There was no obstruction because there was no underlying crime. There is nothing there, you lost totally and completely and that is why trump will never be impeached, that is why nancy is staying far far away from it, and that's why a majority of americans don't support it either. Completely owned and decimated. You aren't fooling anyone, we all know you lost, and you know it too, deep down.

No, plenty of evidence was found to support obstruction charges. At least six where all three elements were met.

A. The intent is provable.
B. The POTUS doesn't have the right to fire someone for corrupt purposes like obstruction of justice.
C. Trump refused to sit for an interview with Mueller and wasn't transparent.
D. Russia wasn't fake news, as I've already proven and the Mueller Report confirms. They confirmed Russia executed a 'sweeping and systemic attack' on our elections, and the Trump campaign welcomed that.
E. Obstruction doesn't require an underlying crime, as Barr confirmed, under oath, this past Tuesday.
F. You should try and be less of a cum-guzzling whore.

Clearly you've not read the report and the words it used are evidently too big for someone of your sub-simian mental faculties.

Impeachment hearings are coming, no matter how hard you shit your Hello Kitty undies, Cindy.
 
Trump is not a serious candidate
Trump will never get the nomination
Trump will NEVER win election, it's impossible
Trump wasn't spied on by obama
It's mueller time, trump is going down
Trump jr. is going to be arrested
Trump is going to be impeached <-- you are here.
Trump wont be reelected
 
10 counts of nothing, because he was never charged with obstruction of justice. even mueller couldn't conclusively say he did anything. you have literally nothing.

You can think whatever you want though. I will sit over here and continue to win. At some point, I shoudn't have to justify anything, you are all talk. My side gets results over and over. You can live with your delusions, I am living in the real world. No collusion, no obstruction, no impeachment. you lose.


:lolup:

10 counts of obstruction, bitch. Count them.

The country loses with this pathogically lying piece of human shit. Why do you surround yourself with such taintstains?
 
No, plenty of evidence was found to support obstruction charges. At least six where all three elements were met.

B. The POTUS doesn't have the right to fire someone for corrupt purposes like obstruction of justice.

correct, but obstruction of justice is predicated upon corrupt intent, which is based on if there is an underlying crime, which there isn't. A president can fully shut down an erroneous investigation. And trump didn't even do that. You are stupid.
 
:lolup:

10 counts of obstruction, bitch. Count them.

The country loses with this pathogically lying piece of human shit. Why do you surround yourself with such taintstains?

you know your lost, it's palpable. It'll be ok. Well, maybe not for you.
 
Back
Top